The Power of Persistence: Education System ... - EQUIP123.net
The Power of Persistence: Education System ... - EQUIP123.net
The Power of Persistence: Education System ... - EQUIP123.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EDUCO’s success exemplifies a technical program affecting the institutional<br />
and political environments. As has been mentioned, the goal <strong>of</strong> EDUCO was to<br />
respond to the need for education in underserved communities. <strong>The</strong> technical<br />
solution was decentralized governance and school finance for community<br />
schools. Repercussions <strong>of</strong> this technical intervention included the creation <strong>of</strong> new<br />
institutional entities (ACEs and CDEs), new institutional arrangements (between<br />
schools and teachers, teachers and MINED, and MINED and communities), and<br />
new legislation formalizing the entities interactions (Bejar, 1997). Widespread<br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> EDUCO’s impact, through evaluations and publicity, strengthened<br />
the public perception and acceptance <strong>of</strong> community and parent involvement in<br />
school management. Politically, it increased MINED’s visibility and credibility<br />
and altered the dynamics <strong>of</strong> interaction within MINED and the education sector<br />
to significantly reduce political patronage or clientismo.<br />
A long-term review <strong>of</strong> the reforms demonstrates the iterative processes that<br />
characterize Salvadoran education. ACEs, for instance, were first instituted in<br />
1992 to promote local participation and school-based management in EDUCO<br />
schools. Similar structures, CDEs and CECEs, were institutionalized by 1998<br />
for all traditional public and religious schools. However, it became apparent<br />
that the quality <strong>of</strong> the school management committees varied widely (Cuéllar-<br />
Marchelli, 2003). By 2001, MINED introduced school management tools, known<br />
as PEI and PEA (Proyecto Educativo Institucional and Proyecto Eduactivo Anual)<br />
that were supposed to improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> ACEs and CDEs. <strong>The</strong>se are<br />
mission, vision, and planning tools that each school is legally required to have:<br />
the PEI is the school’s five-year plan, and the PEA is an annual list <strong>of</strong> activities<br />
that the school intends to implement, such as fundraising, special events,<br />
learning activities, or lesson plans. More recently, MINED is applying a School<br />
Report Card methodology to further improve the quality and utility <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PEIs and PEAs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Donors<br />
MINED was heavily dependent on the financial and technical resources<br />
provided by external donors, particularly in the beginning <strong>of</strong> the reform period.<br />
Donor assistance has been a catalyst in enabling the continuing reforms and<br />
strengthening the education sector. For example, from 1991 to 2005 the IDB,<br />
World Bank, and USAID contributed over $552 million to the Salvadoran<br />
education sector. Other donors included the United Nations (UNESCO), the<br />
European Union, and the Organization <strong>of</strong> Iberian-American States (OEI).<br />
Donations and technical assistance were also received from the governments<br />
<strong>of</strong> Japan, Mexico, Spain, Israel, France, and Germany (Guzmán, 2002).<br />
SECTION 2: lESSONS fROM COUNTRY CASE STUdIES<br />
77