Update on Merger with Polymetals - Notice of Meeting
Update on Merger with Polymetals - Notice of Meeting
Update on Merger with Polymetals - Notice of Meeting
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 15 -<br />
(b)<br />
the Technical Specialist’s Report at Annexure B; and<br />
The Annexures include informati<strong>on</strong> about:<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
<strong>Polymetals</strong>’ projects, mineral resources and ore reserves; and<br />
<strong>Polymetals</strong> assets, liabilities and financial positi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
1.13 Litigati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>Polymetals</strong> is currently subject to litigati<strong>on</strong> in the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />
brought by Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd (Peak) <strong>on</strong> 6 July 2009 seeking damages <strong>of</strong><br />
$5,240,984. Peak alleges <strong>Polymetals</strong> made a number <strong>of</strong> misleading and deceptive<br />
statements pursuant to secti<strong>on</strong> 72 <strong>of</strong> the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) in relati<strong>on</strong> to a joint<br />
venture agreement between <strong>Polymetals</strong> and Peak dated 16 August 2006 (Peak JVA). The<br />
Peak JVA c<strong>on</strong>cerns the development <strong>of</strong> the Mt Boppy Project held by <strong>Polymetals</strong>’<br />
wholly-owned subsidiary, <strong>Polymetals</strong> (Mt Boppy) Pty Ltd.<br />
The damages being sought by Peak are for:<br />
• m<strong>on</strong>ies paid to <strong>Polymetals</strong>;<br />
• GST <strong>on</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ies paid to <strong>Polymetals</strong>; and<br />
• m<strong>on</strong>ies expended <strong>on</strong> salaries to staff engaged to further the site and costs associated<br />
<strong>with</strong> improving the mine site,<br />
all in relati<strong>on</strong> to the Peak JVA.<br />
<strong>Polymetals</strong> denies that there were any misrepresentati<strong>on</strong>s and has filed a counterclaim<br />
against Peak. Under the counterclaim, <strong>Polymetals</strong> is seeking damages <strong>of</strong> $2,600,000 plus<br />
interest for Peak’s breach <strong>of</strong> the Peak JVA for Peak’s failure to purchase gold products from<br />
the Mt Boppy Project during the term <strong>of</strong> the Peak JVA.<br />
As the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> was brought against <strong>Polymetals</strong> prior to its listing <strong>on</strong> the ASX in 2011<br />
(IPO), the pre-IPO <strong>Polymetals</strong> Shareholders created the PMG Unit Trust and collectively<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributed $4 milli<strong>on</strong> to the PMG Unit Trust. The PMG Unit Trust granted <strong>Polymetals</strong> an<br />
indemnity against the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> (and other litigati<strong>on</strong> that has subsequently been<br />
settled) (limited to the cash in the PMG Unit Trust) to the extent that the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
determined or settled unfavourably against <strong>Polymetals</strong> (PMG Indemnity).<br />
As at 23 May 2013, the PMG Unit Trust balance was $3.7 milli<strong>on</strong>. The PMG Unit Trust<br />
meets the costs <strong>of</strong> the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> under the terms <strong>of</strong> the PMG Indemnity.<br />
In order to mitigate the potential risk <strong>of</strong> the Merged Group to the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
<strong>Polymetals</strong> and SXG have agreed, as a Scheme C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>, that Meadowhead<br />
Investments will grant a full indemnity in respect <strong>of</strong> the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Meadowhead Investments has agreed to grant the Meadowhead Indemnity in<br />
exchange for the Indemnity C<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The Meadowhead Indemnity is subordinate to the PMG Indemnity.<br />
Following the implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Scheme, Meadowhead Investments’ major asset will<br />
be its SXG Shares and its ability to meet the Meadowhead Indemnity will be dependent<br />
up<strong>on</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> those SXG Shares. To the extent that there is insufficient value in the<br />
SXG Shares held by Meadowhead Investments to fulfil Meadowhead Investments’<br />
obligati<strong>on</strong>s under the Meadowhead Indemnity, unless Meadowhead has access to other<br />
assets at the relevant time, SXG will bear that residual exposure.