25.01.2015 Views

Update on Merger with Polymetals - Notice of Meeting

Update on Merger with Polymetals - Notice of Meeting

Update on Merger with Polymetals - Notice of Meeting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 15 -<br />

(b)<br />

the Technical Specialist’s Report at Annexure B; and<br />

The Annexures include informati<strong>on</strong> about:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

<strong>Polymetals</strong>’ projects, mineral resources and ore reserves; and<br />

<strong>Polymetals</strong> assets, liabilities and financial positi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

1.13 Litigati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>Polymetals</strong> is currently subject to litigati<strong>on</strong> in the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

brought by Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd (Peak) <strong>on</strong> 6 July 2009 seeking damages <strong>of</strong><br />

$5,240,984. Peak alleges <strong>Polymetals</strong> made a number <strong>of</strong> misleading and deceptive<br />

statements pursuant to secti<strong>on</strong> 72 <strong>of</strong> the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) in relati<strong>on</strong> to a joint<br />

venture agreement between <strong>Polymetals</strong> and Peak dated 16 August 2006 (Peak JVA). The<br />

Peak JVA c<strong>on</strong>cerns the development <strong>of</strong> the Mt Boppy Project held by <strong>Polymetals</strong>’<br />

wholly-owned subsidiary, <strong>Polymetals</strong> (Mt Boppy) Pty Ltd.<br />

The damages being sought by Peak are for:<br />

• m<strong>on</strong>ies paid to <strong>Polymetals</strong>;<br />

• GST <strong>on</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ies paid to <strong>Polymetals</strong>; and<br />

• m<strong>on</strong>ies expended <strong>on</strong> salaries to staff engaged to further the site and costs associated<br />

<strong>with</strong> improving the mine site,<br />

all in relati<strong>on</strong> to the Peak JVA.<br />

<strong>Polymetals</strong> denies that there were any misrepresentati<strong>on</strong>s and has filed a counterclaim<br />

against Peak. Under the counterclaim, <strong>Polymetals</strong> is seeking damages <strong>of</strong> $2,600,000 plus<br />

interest for Peak’s breach <strong>of</strong> the Peak JVA for Peak’s failure to purchase gold products from<br />

the Mt Boppy Project during the term <strong>of</strong> the Peak JVA.<br />

As the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> was brought against <strong>Polymetals</strong> prior to its listing <strong>on</strong> the ASX in 2011<br />

(IPO), the pre-IPO <strong>Polymetals</strong> Shareholders created the PMG Unit Trust and collectively<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributed $4 milli<strong>on</strong> to the PMG Unit Trust. The PMG Unit Trust granted <strong>Polymetals</strong> an<br />

indemnity against the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> (and other litigati<strong>on</strong> that has subsequently been<br />

settled) (limited to the cash in the PMG Unit Trust) to the extent that the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> was<br />

determined or settled unfavourably against <strong>Polymetals</strong> (PMG Indemnity).<br />

As at 23 May 2013, the PMG Unit Trust balance was $3.7 milli<strong>on</strong>. The PMG Unit Trust<br />

meets the costs <strong>of</strong> the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong> under the terms <strong>of</strong> the PMG Indemnity.<br />

In order to mitigate the potential risk <strong>of</strong> the Merged Group to the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

<strong>Polymetals</strong> and SXG have agreed, as a Scheme C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>, that Meadowhead<br />

Investments will grant a full indemnity in respect <strong>of</strong> the Peak Litigati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Meadowhead Investments has agreed to grant the Meadowhead Indemnity in<br />

exchange for the Indemnity C<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The Meadowhead Indemnity is subordinate to the PMG Indemnity.<br />

Following the implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Scheme, Meadowhead Investments’ major asset will<br />

be its SXG Shares and its ability to meet the Meadowhead Indemnity will be dependent<br />

up<strong>on</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> those SXG Shares. To the extent that there is insufficient value in the<br />

SXG Shares held by Meadowhead Investments to fulfil Meadowhead Investments’<br />

obligati<strong>on</strong>s under the Meadowhead Indemnity, unless Meadowhead has access to other<br />

assets at the relevant time, SXG will bear that residual exposure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!