30.01.2015 Views

Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County

Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County

Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Economics Appendix – Draft Report - <strong>Orestimba</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong>, <strong>Stanislaus</strong> <strong>County</strong>, California – September 2012<br />

Procedures used in the Estimation of Agricultural Damages<br />

The discussion below indicates considerations used in the computation of agricultural damages within<br />

the <strong>Orestimba</strong> <strong>Study</strong> Area.<br />

The current land use for the <strong>Study</strong> Area was secured from the <strong>County</strong> Assessor data identified as the<br />

agricultural land area for each flood event.<br />

The land/crop uses were categorized into five general categories for analytical and reporting purposes.<br />

The five general categories of land/crop use are:<br />

1. Truck and Specialty Crops – including processing tomatoes<br />

2. Field Crops – including row crops like corn, broccoli, and beans<br />

3. Orchard – including walnuts and almonds<br />

4. Alfalfa and irrigated pasture<br />

5. Other – including lands irrigated and native pasture and lands that are idle, semiagricultural,<br />

and native vegetation<br />

Agricultural damages due to flooding for each acre are computed by adding four elements:<br />

1) The cumulative direct production or annual variable costs incurred prior to flooding<br />

2) The net value of the crop affected by the flood event<br />

3) Depreciated value of perennial crops lost as a direct result of flooding<br />

4) The land clean-up and rehabilitation resulting from flooding<br />

Direct Production Costs<br />

Cultural costs are incurred periodically throughout the crop year. Examples of these direct production<br />

costs include: seedbed preparation, chemical and fertilizer application, hired labor, seed, planting, and<br />

weed and pest control. These individual crop costs for the five crops are computed on a monthly basis<br />

to determine the amount of expended cultural costs at the time of the flood event. An example of the<br />

monthly production costs is included in Table 4 for the production of blackeye beans in the study area.<br />

Net Value of Crop<br />

The second component represents the net income of the crop plus return to fixed items of production<br />

such as land, labor and management, real estate taxes, and fixed costs associated with pre-harvest and<br />

harvest activities. The net value of the crop is the amount of revenue that the producer may not get if a<br />

significant flood event were to occur on his property.<br />

For purposes of this analysis, the value of the crop is determined computationally by using a three to<br />

five year average for both yields and prices in order to alleviate some of the short-term variability that<br />

is common in agricultural production. The prices and yields are evaluated in an MS Excel<br />

spreadsheet analysis using the @Risk add-in software developed by the Palisades Corporation; this<br />

software allows uncertainty around key variables to be explicitly considered. For example, a<br />

triangular distribution which describes the low, high and median prices and yields was used to derive<br />

the appropriate crop values for use in this analysis.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!