30.01.2015 Views

Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County

Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County

Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Economics Appendix – Draft Report - <strong>Orestimba</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong>, <strong>Stanislaus</strong> <strong>County</strong>, California – September 2012<br />

Last year's disaster (2009) swept pollutants into the Red and its tributaries, although the<br />

sheer volume of water and accelerated flow rate weakened the effect, said David Glatt,<br />

environmental chief for the North Dakota Department of Health. Even as officials were<br />

ready to declare victory in this year's flood fight, Glatt emphasized the importance of<br />

safeguarding drinking water supplies, particularly in rural areas where private wells<br />

may have been submerged.<br />

No large-scale water-quality testing was conducted in 2009, but officials monitored<br />

hospital emergency rooms and found no upswing in visits that would have indicated an<br />

outbreak of flood-related sickness, Glatt said. Officials credited experience and public<br />

education with preventing serious environmental health problems.<br />

"We've had a little familiarity with floods in recent history," Glatt said. "People have had<br />

an opportunity to prepare and minimize the harm."<br />

Cities in the region have reduced their exposure to contaminated water over the years by<br />

elevating wellheads or surrounding them with dikes to keep floodwaters out. But<br />

numerous wastewater treatment systems were overwhelmed during last year's flooding,<br />

forcing officials to dump raw sewage into the rivers. A few have requested permission to<br />

do likewise this year if necessary.<br />

Private well users are particularly vulnerable. State and local agencies have provided<br />

information about protecting residential wells and stand ready to help disinfect<br />

contaminated ones. Fargo-Cass Public Health last week warned owners of submerged<br />

wells not to use the water for drinking or cooking until it can be tested. Agencies also<br />

urged people to secure household and farm chemicals, fuel tanks and other potential<br />

sources of pollution.<br />

Dead livestock is a particular threat in Great Plains ranch country. Some 90,000 head of<br />

cattle were lost during last year's calamity. They're a potential source of pathogens that<br />

can pollute wells and surface waters.<br />

"Even a typically normal, healthy cow has E. coli bacteria in its gut," Bergland said.<br />

"You need to properly dispose of the bodies before they drift away in the water."<br />

State agencies, including the North Dakota National Guard, helped retrieve bloated<br />

carcasses and advised ranchers how to deal with them. It's not as simple as it sounds. If<br />

buried, the bodies must be placed above the water table under at least 4 feet of loamy,<br />

clay soils. If burned, only organic fuels such as wood can be used and a state permit is<br />

required.<br />

Once immediate flood dangers have passed, ecological aftereffects can persist for months<br />

or years.<br />

Phosphorus fertilizers that wash into rivers and lakes can stimulate growth of algae<br />

blooms that reduce oxygen levels and kill fish. Heavy soil erosion along riverbanks<br />

degrades fish habitat and spawning areas, particularly in streams that feed larger rivers<br />

such as the Red.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!