Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County
Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County
Orestimba Creek Feasibility Study - Stanislaus County
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Economics Appendix – Draft Report - <strong>Orestimba</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong>, <strong>Stanislaus</strong> <strong>County</strong>, California – September 2012<br />
Table 12<br />
Agricultural Damages by Flood Event<br />
Without Project Damages by event<br />
Total Estimated Dollars of Damages by Event*<br />
------------------------ Flood Frequency---------------------------<br />
CROP LOSS 5 10 20 50 100 200 500<br />
FRUITS AND NUTS 1,293,238 2,116,207 2,571,780 2,830,794 2,950,199 3,045,722 3,160,533<br />
FIELD CROPS 306,082 692,294 957,111 1,229,748 1,354,587 1,495,910 1,588,125<br />
PASTURE & ALFALFA 219,817 907,253 1,165,193 1,475,857 1,596,716 1,749,615 1,932,120<br />
RICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
TRUCK CROPS 942,978 1,170,593 1,433,362 1,689,100 1,976,475 2,175,968 2,393,916<br />
VINE CROPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
OTHER 69,559 86,850 98,873 84,829 114,613 118,943 122,892<br />
TOTAL 2,831,674 4,973,197 6,226,318 7,310,328 7,992,590 8,586,157 9,197,587<br />
EQUIPMENT LOSSES<br />
FRUITS AND NUTS 52,237 85,478 103,880 114,342 119,165 123,024 127,661<br />
FIELD CROPS 56,202 128,706 179,626 232,560 254,942 276,830 294,348<br />
PASTURE & ALFALFA 21,951 90,599 116,357 147,380 159,449 174,717 192,942<br />
RICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
TRUCK CROPS 40,774 50,616 61,978 73,036 85,462 94,088 103,512<br />
VINE CROPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
OTHER 104,006 126,426 142,690 120,194 164,540 170,164 174,762<br />
TOTAL 275,170 481,825 604,531 687,512 783,558 838,823 893,225<br />
ALFALFA STORAGE LOSSES<br />
ALFALFA HAY LOSS 117,583 485,301 623,277 789,455 854,104 935,891 1,033,515<br />
GRAND TOTAL 3,224,427 5,940,323 7,454,125 8,787,294 9,630,251 10,360,871 11,124,327<br />
Analysis of Project Alternatives<br />
Three project alternatives are considered for in-depth analysis in this evaluation, including the no<br />
action alternative.<br />
No Action. The Corps is required to consider the option of “No Action” as one of the<br />
alternatives in order to comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act<br />
(NEPA). No action assumes that no project would be implemented by the Federal Government<br />
or by local interests to achieve the planning objectives. No Action, which is synonymous with<br />
the “Without Project Condition”, forms the basis from which all other alternative plans are<br />
measured. The No Action has no costs or flood damage reduction benefits.<br />
68
Change language