Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Finally, all the methods were not used in Baran, Dausa and to a large extent in Jhalawar and Dholpur. In other districts, some or the other method was deployed for building awareness on DPIP. Did the NGO/village entry team discuss infrastructure facilities, social resources, need assessment, social evils like dowry etc. The response shows that in Rajsamand and Tonk and to a lesser extent in Churu, infrastructure facilities available in the village were discussed. In Dholpur 57.14 percent and 41.1 percent in Jhalawar reported that discussions were held. Social resources of the village were discussed in Rajasamand, Tonk with lesser extent in Churu followed by Dholpur. Need assessment of the village was largely discussed in Rajsamand followed by Tonk, Churu and Dholpur. In other districts not much importance was given. A similar pattern is observed in case of social evils like dowry, though with lower intensity. Women Participation What was the extent of participation of women in awareness meetings The response was scaled as up to 20 percent, 21 to 50 percent, 51 plus. The response reveals that across districts, a significant proportion with varied intensity women participation was between 21 to 50 percent in awareness meetings. It is only in Rajasamand, Tonk and Churu around one-fourth reported women participation to the extent of 51 percent and above. CIG Formation How was CIG formed The first question was whether the individuals approached CF/PFT and asked to join a particular group. The response shows that except for Baran and Jhalawar in all other districts below 37 percent affirmed it. Were some villagers approached by CF/PFT to join a group The response shows that only in Baran, Dausa and Jhalawar little more than half the CIGs affirmed that is happened. Was the information regarding the project given in a gram sabha The response revealed that it occurred to some extent in Tonk and Churu (46% plus). 120
Were the villagers informed about the project in the gram sabha, given the option of joining different groups, formed group there and then The response reveals that except for Baran, Dausa and Jhalawar in all other districts the proportion was 64 percent plus. Whether specific villagers were informed by the CF first and then a gram sabha was held. This largely did not happen across districts. Besides, available options were hardly discussed in gram sabha. CF largely failed to give any information in any of the districts. On issue of who facilitated the group formation, the response reveals that NGO’s role is limited; though in Dholpur 16.7 percent affirmed it. The role of CF/PPT as facilitator was largely acknowledged in Baran, Dholpur, Dausa and Jhalawar. In other districts though CF/PPTs did help in group formation, the role was limited. It however, emerges that in Baran and Tonk quite a significant percentage of groups were formed their own. The role of PRI has been negligible. A combination of all the above facilitator was quite visible in Churu, Rajsamand, Tonk and Dholpur. The selection of President and treasurer of the group was largely across the districts through common acceptance. There is a mixed response to the question on time taken for group formation. Most groups were formed in a month’s time followed more than a month and fortnight. Very few groups were reportedly formed within a week. On the issue of bank account opening for the group, it is found that 63.41 percent in Dausa to 78.57 percent in Dholpur CF, president and treasurer helped in opening the account. President of the group was active in Baran, Dausa and Jhalawar (more than one fifth groups). All CIG members were also instrumental in opening the bank account (4.11% in Jhalawar and 15.79% in Tonk). Treasurer has a limited role in this as widely reported. Group Functioning Few questions were asked from the group members on functioning of the groups. It was found that most groups in Churu, Dholpur, Dausa, Tonk and Rajsamand only did saving and no loaning. However, 5.26 percent groups in Tonk to 53.42 percent groups in Jhalawar only CIG formation took place and no savings. Groups did not get into activities like saving and loaning 121
Page 1 and 2:
Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4:
limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6:
Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8:
for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10:
MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12:
* Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14:
The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16:
Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 19 and 20:
NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 8
Page 21 and 22:
Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24:
-----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26:
40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28:
-----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30:
Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32:
Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34:
Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36:
Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38:
CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39 and 40:
Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 41 and 42:
milk and the average annual income
Page 43 and 44:
Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46:
For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47 and 48:
N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 49 and 50:
N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 741
Page 51 and 52:
was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54:
Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55 and 56:
Per capita income from famine works
Page 57 and 58:
Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107
Page 59 and 60:
Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62:
Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68:
Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70: Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72: Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74: Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75 and 76: Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 77 and 78: Some households also still engage t
Page 79 and 80: though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82: Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84: APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86: BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88: Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90: Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92: Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94: Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96: Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98: Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100: Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102: Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104: Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106: Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108: Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110: Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112: BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114: Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116: Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119: Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 123 and 124: is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 125 and 126: Is there any conversation between t
Page 127 and 128: It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130: Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132: • It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134: • Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136: • Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138: The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140: Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142: Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144: Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146: Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148: Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150: APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152: Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154: Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156: If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158: Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160: Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162: Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164: Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166: Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168: Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170: Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?