Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Salary Income There are few households that have some members with jobs that earn them regular salaries. In 2001, there were 51 CIG member households while this number went down to 41 in 2007 (table 2.43). The same is the case with nonCIG member households. Across the districts the number is small of salary earning households. In Baran, the number was 5 in 2001 that fell to 4 by 2007. In Churu, Dausa, Rajsamand and Dholpur the number of such CIG member households reduced. Similar pattern is observed in case of nonCIG households. Table 2.43: Changes in Average Income from Salaries by Type of Households (Rs. pa) District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG NonCIG CIG NonCIG CIG NonCIG Baran Mean 14208 10819 11073 25188 -22 133 N 5 5 4 8 Churu Mean 21359 21337 49411 30418 131 43 N 13 21 5 7 Dausa Mean 27605 24191 17272 10747 -37 -56 N 6 11 5 7 Dholpur Mean 21400 17456 15639 28275 -27 62 N 7 18 6 9 Jhalawar Mean 8221 10758 12056 17714 47 65 N 1 4 8 13 Rajsamand Mean 20704 29798 22257 29120 8 -2 N 13 33 5 24 Tonk Mean 21245 23342 16867 31902 -21 37 N 6 6 8 8 Total Mean 20960 22948 19859 25375 -5 11 N 51 98 41 76 In 2001, among the CIG member households, the average annual income from salaries ranged between Rs.8221 in Jhalawar to Rs.27605 in Dausa. In 2007, the range was Rs.11073 in Baran and Rs.49411 in Churu. However, Baran, Dausa, Dholpur and Tonk a decline is observed in this source of income among CIG member households and in Dausa and Rajsamand among nonCIG member households. There could be varied reasons for this change like young family members joining the labour market as salaried employees, older ones retiring, lost temporary job and so on. However, nonCIG member households have fared better in this regard. This could also mean that DPIP has helped CIG member households have income in the village and temporary jobs have been given up or CIG member himself has given up job for self-employment in the village. Household Industry Income There were 15 CIG member households in 2001 that were engaged in household industry and this number fell to 7 in 2007.Such nonCIG households were 39 in 2001, but reduced to 10 in 2007. Table 2.44 shows that the average annual income has reduced across districts among CIG member households except Churu where it improved by 144 percent. In case of nonCIG member households, in Baran and Churu the average income improved while in other districts it declined. The income from this source itself has not been much; Rs.5045 in Tonk and Rs.13354 in Baran. It is also that only few families have this source of income. Mortality rate of household industry without any institutional support also is very high in rural areas. Table 2.44: Changes in Average Income from Household Industry by Type of Households (Rs. pa) District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG NonCIG CIG NonCIG CIG NonCIG Baran Mean 16915 10474 13354 16322 -21 56 48
N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 7419 22752 144 11 N 1 5 1 3 Dausa Mean 8844 10426 7419 -100 -29 N 7 11 2 Dholpur Mean 10656 5074 -100 -100 N 2 1 Jhalawar Mean 2436 -100 N 1 Rajsamand Mean 6089 29192 9645 -100 -67 N 1 11 2 Tonk Mean 12788 6191 5045 4451 -61 -28 N 5 5 5 1 Total Mean 10897 16132 6571 13948 -40 -14 N 19 39 7 10 Income from Retail Business (Petty Shops) This source of income is also for 8 CIG member households in 2001 and 15 in 2007. Such nonCIG households are 23. Table 2.45 shows that among CIG member households there is decline in average annual income across districts. However, this is not the case among nonCIG member households. Some CIG households that have this source of income earn fairly reasonable income (Rs.35611 in Churu). It is also observed that it has become a source of income in Churu and Dausa for CIG households in 2007, while in Dholpur the households lost this source of income. Table 2.45: Changes in Average Income from Retail Business (Petty Shop) (Rs. pa) District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG NonCIG CIG NonCIG CIG NonCIG Baran Mean 4567 9134 2968 10758 -35 18 N 2 5 1 3 Churu Mean 15731 35611 13354 -15 N 2 1 1 Dausa Mean 13016 7419 13354 3 N 4 2 4 Dholpur Mean 24357 11502 18733 -100 63 N 1 3 4 Jhalawar Mean 12179 14208 11870 16693 -3 17 N 1 4 2 2 Rajsamand Mean 40596 37619 21515 19290 -47 -49 N 1 3 5 3 Tonk Mean 18471 9134 10016 20167 -46 121 N 3 2 4 6 Total Mean 17710 15290 14986 16793 -15 10 N 8 23 15 23 Famine Relief Work Income It appears that there many households that earn income by working in famine works and now it could be NREGA. However, the annual average income earned is only marginal. Table 2.46 reveals that among the CIG member households, this source of income is largely in Rajsamand and Tonk (34 and 42 households respectively). The average annual income ranges between Rs.1365 in Tonk in 2001 among CIG households and Rs.6292 in Churu. In 2007, Baran and Rajsamand had no CIG household reporting this income. This could be positive impact of DPIP in these districts. In Churu, the CIG household number increased significantly and in Dholpur, Dausa, Jhalawar and Tonk the number of households increased too. This has happened when 2001 was a drought year and 2007 was a good year. This has one implication that the DPIP income and income from other sources is not enough for the households to sustain and so some households do venture into relief works to have 49
Page 1 and 2: Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4: limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8: for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10: MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12: * Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14: The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16: Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 19 and 20: NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 8
Page 21 and 22: Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24: -----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26: 40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28: -----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30: Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32: Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34: Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36: Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38: CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39 and 40: Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 41 and 42: milk and the average annual income
Page 43 and 44: Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46: For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47: N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 51 and 52: was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54: Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55 and 56: Per capita income from famine works
Page 57 and 58: Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62: Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68: Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70: Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72: Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74: Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75 and 76: Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 77 and 78: Some households also still engage t
Page 79 and 80: though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82: Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84: APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86: BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88: Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90: Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92: Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94: Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96: Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98: Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100:
Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102:
Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112:
BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114:
Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119 and 120:
Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 121 and 122:
Were the villagers informed about t
Page 123 and 124:
is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 125 and 126:
Is there any conversation between t
Page 127 and 128:
It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130:
Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132:
• It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134:
• Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136:
• Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138:
The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140:
Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142:
Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144:
Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146:
Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148:
Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150:
APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152:
Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154:
Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156:
If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162:
Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164:
Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166:
Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168:
Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170:
Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?