Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Decision making in SPA What was the process of finalizing the sub-project proposal Decided by CF/NGO or others, but not by group members– the response was affirmative in 26.7 percent groups in Baran, 15.4 percent in Churu, 26.2 percent in Dholpur, 17.1 percent in Dausa, 21.9 percent in Jhalawar, were in Rajsamand and 7.9 percent in Tonk. At the aggregate level, 47 groups of 272 reported so. Decided by CF/NGO or others with a few, but not all group members– the response varied between 5.26 percent groups in Tonk and 28.8 percent groups in Jhalawar in affirmative. Again only 50 groups at the aggregate level said so. Group members discussed a few given options, selected one option, and finalized the proposal with the NGO-provided expert– the response was in affirmative in 43.9 percent groups in Dausa and 78.3 percent groups in Rajsamand. In all, this happened in 161 groups of the 272 groups. Group members discussed a few given options with NGO– provided experts jointly selected one option and finalized the proposal with the expert– the response was yes varying from no group in Baran and 23.7 percent groups in Tonk. In all, only 22 groups said so. Group members discussed all proposal options with NGO- provided experts, short listed a few options, jointly selected one option and finalized the proposal with the expert. The response was in affirmative in only 4 districts and response varied between a low of the 1.4 percent groups in Jhalawar to a high of 13.16 percent groups in Tonk in all, 11 groups affirmed it. Was a discussion held among the CIG member to select SPA– all the groups in Rajsamand and Tonk affirmed it. In other districts, the response varied between 79.5 percent groups in Jhalawar and 89.7 percent groups in Baran. In all, 231 groups affirmed that discussions were held. 124
Is there any conversation between traditional occupation and SPA– it largely happened in Baran, Dholpur and Tonk. In other districts, the proportion of group varied between 19.23 percent in Churu to 61.64 percent in Jhalawar. Do the members of CIG know the total cost of the project In Churu and Rajsamand none of the groups reported that all members had the knowledge, while in other districts awareness reported was 2.38 percent groups in Dholpur and 24.39 percent groups in Dausa. On the issue of facilitation in SPA selection and proposal submission, it is revealed that CF has not visited the group since the sub project proposal is as submitted on 15.32 per cent groups in Jhalawar followed by 13.04 percent groups in Rajsamand and none in Dholpur and Tonk. This means that CF did under take facilitation in large percent age of groups across districts. It is also observed that 46.34 percent groups reported that CF comes but not regularly and did not provide all the required information in Dausa followed by 38.4 percent groups in Jhalawar, 24.1 percent groups in Baran and just 4.76 percent groups in Dholpur. This means though CFs did facilitate submission of sub project proposal, though they largely did not provide all the necessary information. CF performed average facilitation in terms of coming regularly, giving all the required information, teaching how to open bank accounts and maintain account books in 12.9 percent of groups in Dholpur, 86.8 percent groups in Tonk, 69.2 percent groups in Churu and about 39 percent groups in Dausa. Did CF provide good facilitation in terms of all members knowing the date of visit of CF in advance, knew when awareness and training programmes are to be held, the response was in affirmative in 2.44 percent groups in Dausa and 21.05 percent groups in Tonk. On performing this role CFs largely were found wanting. Did CF provide excellent facilitation in terms of him teaching the group as to how to get information from government offices and how to resolve conflicts without the group; the response was in negative – only 2.44 percent groups in Dausa reported CF did this facilitation. 125
Page 1 and 2:
Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4:
limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6:
Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8:
for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10:
MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12:
* Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14:
The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16:
Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 19 and 20:
NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 8
Page 21 and 22:
Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24:
-----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26:
40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28:
-----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30:
Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32:
Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34:
Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36:
Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38:
CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39 and 40:
Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 41 and 42:
milk and the average annual income
Page 43 and 44:
Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46:
For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47 and 48:
N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 49 and 50:
N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 741
Page 51 and 52:
was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54:
Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55 and 56:
Per capita income from famine works
Page 57 and 58:
Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107
Page 59 and 60:
Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62:
Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64:
Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68:
Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70:
Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74: Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75 and 76: Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 77 and 78: Some households also still engage t
Page 79 and 80: though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82: Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84: APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86: BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88: Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90: Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92: Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94: Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96: Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98: Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100: Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102: Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104: Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106: Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108: Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110: Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112: BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114: Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116: Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119 and 120: Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 121 and 122: Were the villagers informed about t
Page 123: is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 127 and 128: It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130: Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132: • It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134: • Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136: • Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138: The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140: Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142: Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144: Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146: Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148: Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150: APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152: Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154: Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156: If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158: Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160: Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162: Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164: Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166: Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168: Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170: Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172: Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174: Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 175 and 176:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?