Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

households. The change has been to an extent of 29 percent in Dausa and 505 percent in Dholpur in case of CIG households (table 2.56). The impact of this visible in increase in income from agriculture as discussed. Table 2.56: Area Irrigated (bighas) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2001 2007 Changes% CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baran 2 1 5 7 128 354 Churu 0 0 2 0 -100 Dausa 2 2 3 2 29 15 Dholpur 1 1 4 2 505 245 Jhalawar 1 1 3 6 147 478 Rajsamand 1 1 3 3 178 106 Tonk 2 2 5 4 201 185 Total 1 1 4 4 211 215 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes in Animal Assets Table 2.57 shows that holding of cow by CIG households have declined across districts, though it increased in Baran, Jhalawar and Tonk districts in case on non-CIG member households. In all the cow population with CIG households declined from 391 in 2001 to 241 in 2007. This does reflect on DPIP dairy sector intervention. There is a clear shift from cow to other animals. Table 2.57: Number of Cows District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG Baran Mean 2 2 2 2 -11 4 N 39 91 31 86 Churu Mean 1 1 1 1 -16 -9 N 41 38 33 31 Dausa Mean 1 1 1 1 -2 -22 N 26 66 14 35 Dholpur Mean 1 1 1 1 0 -18 N 9 23 3 4 Jhalawar Mean 1 1 1 2 -3 29 N 40 49 23 33 Rajsamand Mean 2 1 1 1 -22 -14 N 26 85 14 56 Tonk Mean 2 1 2 2 -28 36 N 53 41 50 33 Total Mean 2 2 1 2 -14 6 Sum 391 599 241 451 -38 -25 N 234 393 168 278 As mentioned above, there is an increase in number of she buffaloes across districts with the exception of Dausa in case of CIG households and decline in number in case of non-CIG households in all districts except Churu, Jhalawar, and Rajsamand (table 2.58). This is a positive role of DPIP due to dairy sector intervention. Table 2.58: Number of She buffaloes District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG Baran Mean 1 2 1 2 19 -6 N 8 27 12 27 Churu Mean 1 1 1 1 29 8 N 12 23 38 28 Dausa Mean 1 1 1 1 -15 -11 N 57 74 75 54 56
Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107 75 79 Jhalawar Mean 1 1 2 2 59 43 N 11 11 50 18 Rajsamand Mean 1 1 1 1 2 19 N 21 55 19 67 Tonk Mean 1 2 2 1 32 -12 N 37 34 43 38 Total Mean 1 1 2 1 20 0 Sum 285 437 484 410 70 -6 N 220 331 312 311 The increase in she buffalo mean increase in miching animals. Table 2.59 shows that except for Baran, in all other districts milching bufflaoes’ number has increased in case of CIG households. The increase has been from 6 percent in Rajsamand to 45 percent in Tonk. The total number of milching buffaloes in 2001 were 209 and this number has increased to 390 in CIG households. In case of non-CIG households, the decline is observed across districts except for Baran and Rajsamand. Table 2.59: Number of Milching buffaloes District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG No-nCIG CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG Baran Mean 1 1 1 1 -13 40 N 4 18 12 25 Churu Mean 1 1 1 1 34 -1 N 12 21 35 27 Dausa Mean 1 1 1 1 11 -4 N 54 73 68 48 Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 43 -5 N 74 106 74 75 Jhalawar Mean 1 1 1 1 17 -6 N 7 8 47 17 Rajsamand Mean 1 1 1 1 6 13 N 9 28 17 60 Tonk Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -1 N 30 25 34 31 Total Mean 1 1 1 1 24 1 Sum 209 319 390 326 N 190 279 287 283 The number of goats too has increased in all districts except for Rajsamand (table 2.60). It could be because in Rajasmand buffalo is preferred over goat by CIG households. The total number of goats with CIG households is 1341 in 2007, up from 833 in 2001. In case of Non-CIG households, the number of goats have declined in all districts but for Churu; a semi-arid region. The difference between CIG and non-CIG reflects on DPIP intervention which is positive. Table 2.60: Number of Goats District 2001 2007 Percent Change CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG CIG Non-CIG Baran Mean 5 8 8 8 64 -3 N 22 37 32 27 Churu Mean 3 3 7 3 148 17 N 79 76 70 81 Dausa Mean 2 3 4 2 85 -38 N 37 53 29 37 Dholpur Mean 2 3 3 2 45 -31 N 12 21 9 9 Jhalawar Mean 3 3 3 2 26 -26 N 28 29 21 18 57
Page 1 and 2:
Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4:
limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8: for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10: MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12: * Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14: The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16: Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 19 and 20: NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 8
Page 21 and 22: Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24: -----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26: 40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28: -----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30: Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32: Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34: Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36: Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38: CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39 and 40: Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 41 and 42: milk and the average annual income
Page 43 and 44: Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46: For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47 and 48: N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 49 and 50: N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 741
Page 51 and 52: was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54: Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55: Per capita income from famine works
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62: Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68: Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70: Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72: Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74: Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75 and 76: Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 77 and 78: Some households also still engage t
Page 79 and 80: though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82: Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84: APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86: BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88: Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90: Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92: Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94: Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96: Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98: Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100: Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102: Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104: Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106: Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112:
BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114:
Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119 and 120:
Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 121 and 122:
Were the villagers informed about t
Page 123 and 124:
is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 125 and 126:
Is there any conversation between t
Page 127 and 128:
It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130:
Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132:
• It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134:
• Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136:
• Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138:
The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140:
Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142:
Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144:
Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146:
Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148:
Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150:
APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152:
Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154:
Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156:
If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162:
Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164:
Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166:
Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168:
Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170:
Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?