Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Married 96.20 99.13 99.17 100 98.91 98.48 85.00 96.84 675 Unmarried 0.87 0.83 1.09 1.52 1.00 0.72 5 Widow 3.80 13.00 2.30 16 Widower 1.00 0.14 1 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 697 Non-CIG Member Household Married 97.94 98.51 98.89 94.47 94.92 99.04 82.83 96.12 1089 Unmarried 1.03 1.49 1.11 5.53 5.08 0.96 1.01 2.29 26 Widow 0.52 12.12 1.15 13 Widower 0.52 2.02 0.26 3 Separated 2.02 0.18 2 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1133 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 2.3 shows that each district different caste groups dominating among CIG member households. For instance in Baran it is scheduled tribe (48.84%), in Churu and Dausa, it is scheduled caste (52.17% and 42.5% respectively), OBC in Dholpur (55.20%) and OBC and scheduled caste in Jhalawar (70.66%). It is more homogenous distribution in Rajsamand and OBC in Tonk district. In case of non-CIG member households, a similar pattern is observed for caste configurations. This reveals that poor are from scheduled caste, tribes and also from OBC groups. The proportion of poor coming from general category is relatively less, though the percentage varies from a low of 2.53 percent in Baran and to a high of 24.24 percent in Rajsamand in case of CIG member households, while this percentage varies from a low of 5.67 percent in Baran and to a high of 23.73 percent in Jhalawar in case of non-CIG member households. The family in case of CIG and non-CIG groups is largely nuclear with varying proportions. The households are mainly male-headed in all the districts for both the groups. It is also noticed women-headed households are quite significant in some of the districts like Rajsamand, Tonk, Churu and Dausa in case of CIG group and in Tonk, Churu, Dausa and Rajsamand. It may be pointed out here that in most districts the proportion of women headed households is greater than 10 percent of all households covered. Table 2.3: Caste, Family Type and Type of Household --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Items Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jhalawar Rajsamand Tonk Percent Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Caste CIG Member Households General 2.53 19.13 14.17 7.20 18.48 24.24 11.00 13.49 94 OBC 26.58 27.83 16.67 55.20 36.96 15.15 47.00 33.43 233 SC 24.05 52.17 42.50 24.00 33.70 28.79 28.00 34.15 238 ST 46.84 0.87 26.67 13.60 10.87 31.82 14.00 18.94 132 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 697 NON-CIG Member Households General 5.67 11.94 11.67 13.07 23.73 18.18 13.13 13.50 153 OBC 30.41 35.07 27.22 35.18 36.44 20.10 44.44 31.24 354 SC 28.87 52.99 36.11 37.19 28.81 20.10 30.30 32.83 372 ST 35.05 25.00 14.57 11.02 41.63 12.12 22.42 254 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1133 Family Type CIG Member Households Nuclear 94.94 93.04 85.83 95.20 97.83 95.45 83.00 91.82 640 Joint 5.06 6.96 14.17 4.80 2.17 4.55 17.00 8.18 57 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 697 18
NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 88.14 97.01 88.33 91.46 96.61 95.69 81.82 91.53 1037 Joint 11.86 2.99 11.67 8.54 3.39 4.31 18.18 8.47 96 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1133 Household Type CIG Member Households Man 92.41 86.96 86.67 89.60 93.48 83.33 85.00 88.24 615 Women 6.33 13.04 11.67 10.40 5.43 16.67 15.00 11.19 78 Differently 1.27 1.67 1.09 0.57 4 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 697 Non-CIG Member Households Man 92.78 79.85 85.00 88.94 86.44 84.69 77.78 85.88 973 Women 4.64 18.66 13.89 10.55 12.71 13.88 20.20 12.71 144 Differently 2.58 1.49 1.11 0.50 0.85 1.44 2.02 1.41 16 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1133 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Not all BPL households are really in category of poor households. Investigators reported that there better off households in BPL category. Table 2.4 shows that a large percentage of households are really BPL households and this proportion varies from a low of 79.0 percent in Tonk to a high of 98.48 percent in Rajsamand. In all the districts 90.1 percent CIG member households is really BPL as per the perception of the investigator. In case of non-CIG member households, the proportions vary between a minimum of 71.86 percent in Dholpur and a maximum of 88.81 percent in Churu. The overall proportion for all districts is 79.52 percent. This shows that non BPL households also try to enlist themselves as BPL households in order to get the benefits. Table 2.4: Investigator’s Perception on BPL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Items Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jhalawar Rajsamand Tonk Percent Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CIG Member Households Yes 91.14 88.70 89.17 92.80 94.57 98.48 79.00 90.10 628 No 7.59 9.57 9.17 4.80 5.43 1.52 18.00 8.32 58 NA 1.27 1.74 1.67 2.40 3.00 1.58 11 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 697 Non-CIG Member Households Yes 75.26 88.81 83.89 71.86 74.58 85.17 76.77 79.52 901 No 19.07 5.22 6.11 3.02 13.56 2.87 11.11 8.30 94 NA 5.67 5.97 10.00 25.13 11.86 11.96 12.12 12.18 138 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1133 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Rajasthan a poor family can have a few types of ration cards viz., BPL card, Antoday and APL cards. Table 2.5 reveals that from 54.43 percent in Baran to 80.3 percent in Rajsamand have BPL card amongst the CIG member households. There is large number of these households with Antoday cards also across the districts with Baran at the top with 44.30 percent households. Some also have APL cards. Of the non-CIG member households, 40.3 percent households in Churu and 58.59 percent in Tonk have BPL card, while between 12.12 percent households in Tonk and 24.63 percent households in Churu have Antoday card. A large proportion ranging between 14.83 percent in Rajsamand and 34.33 percent in Churu have APL card. Table 2.5: Possession of a Ration Card by Type --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ration card Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jhalawar Rajsamand Tonk Percent Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CIG Member Households BPL 54.43 60.87 73.33 66.40 76.09 80.30 80.00 69.87 487 19
Page 1 and 2: Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4: limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8: for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10: MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12: * Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14: The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16: Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17: Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 21 and 22: Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24: -----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26: 40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28: -----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30: Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32: Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34: Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36: Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38: CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39 and 40: Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 41 and 42: milk and the average annual income
Page 43 and 44: Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46: For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47 and 48: N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 49 and 50: N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 741
Page 51 and 52: was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54: Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55 and 56: Per capita income from famine works
Page 57 and 58: Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62: Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68: Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70:
Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74:
Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75 and 76:
Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 77 and 78:
Some households also still engage t
Page 79 and 80:
though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82:
Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84:
APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86:
BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88:
Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90:
Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92:
Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94:
Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96:
Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100:
Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102:
Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112:
BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114:
Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119 and 120:
Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 121 and 122:
Were the villagers informed about t
Page 123 and 124:
is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 125 and 126:
Is there any conversation between t
Page 127 and 128:
It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130:
Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132:
• It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134:
• Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136:
• Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138:
The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140:
Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142:
Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144:
Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146:
Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148:
Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150:
APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152:
Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154:
Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156:
If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162:
Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164:
Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166:
Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168:
Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170:
Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?