Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

One major intervention of DPIP has been development of dairy activities. CIG members have purchased goats and buffaloes. With the assistance of Rajasthan Diary Cooperative Federation, linkages were established. We find that across the districts, average income in case of BPL households has not only increased, but these positive changes are better that those occurring in APL households across the districts. It appears that Baran district has performed better than all other districts and it is followed by Jhalawar (table 3.20). The lowest improvement is observed in Dholpur district. If we look at the animal husbandry income in case of non-base line households in 2007, the average income is higher for APL families across the districts. This is true for baseline households in 2007 and 2001. This shows that though there has been improvement in income of BPL households, the differences between APL and BPL has not narrowed. The situation has though improved in a few districts. Table 3.20: Average Income from Animal Husbandry Rs. BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 Changes % Districts APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 6539 589 7168 5959 5804 3855 9.6 912.3 Churu 6421 1703 10860 8170 9497 7911 69.1 379.8 Dausa 6316 2268 11879 8684 11890 9308 88.1 283.0 Dholpur 12704 4077 15812 10623 13294 11434 24.5 160.6 Jhalawar 2507 883 8780 6095 10317 7721 250.2 590.5 Rajsamand 3887 1537 7334 4783 7193 5766 88.7 211.3 Tonk 9285 2667 12658 8084 11130 6853 36.3 203.1 Total 6994 2039 10795 7498 9664 7498 54.4 267.6 Animal Husbandry Income Rs. 16000 14000 Rs. 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Baran Dausa Jhalawar Tonk BLS 2001 APL BLS 2001 BPL BLS 2007 APL BLS 2007 BPL NBLS 2007 APL NBLS 2007 BPL Districts Wage Labour Income 76
Some households also still engage themselves as wage labourers both within the village and outside the village. A priori, with the DPIP intervention, this component should go down. We observed that in 2007 against 2001, in BPL households Churu, Dausa and Dholpur districts have witnessed significant increase in wage labour income and in other districts the increase have been lower (table 3.21). It is interesting to observe that increases in wage labour income of APL households has been greater compared to BPL households. This one can ascribe as a positive impact of DPIP in the sense that it has reduced dependence on wage labour income for such households. However, districts like Churu still observe wage labour income for BPL households being higher than APL households. One can also say that space vacated by BPL households has been captured by APL households within the village. Another notable sign is that compared to BLS 2001, BLS 2007 shows average income from wage labour going in opposite direction, which is that in 2001 across districts wage labour income was higher but reversal took place in 2007 except for Churu. Table 3.21: Average Wage Labour Income within the Village Rs. BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 Chnages % Districts APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 2244 5742 12741 11063 12476 12440 467.7 92.7 Churu 1740 3874 9708 8977 8644 10454 457.9 131.7 Dausa 2184 2702 11855 7938 6780 9040 442.7 193.7 Dholpur 1418 3102 9286 7073 6459 7153 554.8 128.0 Jhalawar 1608 6080 5640 9026 4891 7545 250.7 48.5 Rajsamand 2244 6367 12945 10263 7924 9466 477.0 61.2 Tonk 1694 5686 7257 8341 8175 8358 328.4 46.7 Total 1885 4659 9825 9212 8021 9447 421.1 97.7 Wage Labour Income Rs. 14000 12000 Rs. 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Baran Dausa Jhalawar Tonk BLS 2001 APL BLS 2001 BPL BLS 2007 APL BLS 2007 BPL NBLS 2007 APL NBLS 2007 BPL Districts 77
Page 1 and 2:
Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4:
limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6:
Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8:
for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10:
MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12:
* Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14:
The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16:
Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 19 and 20:
NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 8
Page 21 and 22:
Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24:
-----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26: 40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28: -----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30: Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32: Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34: Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36: Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38: CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39 and 40: Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 41 and 42: milk and the average annual income
Page 43 and 44: Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46: For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47 and 48: N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 49 and 50: N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 741
Page 51 and 52: was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54: Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55 and 56: Per capita income from famine works
Page 57 and 58: Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62: Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68: Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70: Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72: Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74: Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75: Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 79 and 80: though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82: Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84: APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86: BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88: Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90: Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92: Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94: Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96: Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98: Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100: Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102: Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104: Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106: Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108: Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110: Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112: BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114: Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116: Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119 and 120: Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 121 and 122: Were the villagers informed about t
Page 123 and 124: is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 125 and 126: Is there any conversation between t
Page 127 and 128:
It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130:
Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132:
• It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134:
• Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136:
• Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138:
The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140:
Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142:
Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144:
Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146:
Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148:
Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150:
APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152:
Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154:
Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156:
If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162:
Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164:
Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166:
Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168:
Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170:
Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?