Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Total 50 101 73 74 68 48 78 492 492 Periodicity Monthly 12.00 4.35 12.20 20.00 29.41 14.67 22 Quarterly 50.00 8.00 34.78 9.76 32.35 17.33 26 Half-yearly 32.00 43.48 70.73 20.00 32.35 40.67 61 Seasonal 100 50.00 48.00 17.39 7.32 60.00 5.88 27.33 41 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 150 Total 10 2 25 23 41 15 34 150 Non-CIG member Households Yes 40.35 23.15 28.21 50.94 28.86 29.23 27.12 182 Total 114 104 108 78 53 149 65 671 671 Periodicity Monthly 4.55 4.65 21.05 3.85 7 Quarterly 4.00 13.64 11.11 6.98 5.26 6.04 11 Half-yearly 16.00 59.09 81.48 62.79 52.63 41.76 76 Seasonal 100 80.00 22.73 7.41 25.58 21.05 48.35 88 Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 182 Total 46 25 22 27 43 19 182 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Has the milk yield improved with de-worming Yes milk yield has increased across districts for both groups of households (table 2.32). However, Jhalawar and Baran tops the list. Table 2.32: Whether Animals Milk Increased Due to De-worming ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Items Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jhalawar Rajsamand Tonk Percent Total ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CIG member Households Yes 80.00 72.00 21.74 95.12 26.67 58.82 62.67 94 Total 10 2 25 23 41 15 34 150 150 CIG member Households Yes 87.00 52.00 36.36 74.07 58.14 57.89 64.29 117 Total 46 25 22 27 43 19 182 182 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Households do sell milk. In Dholpur 80 percent of the CIG households reported so followed by Jhalawar, Dausa and Tonk (table 2.33). In case of non-CIG households, the proportion of households selling milk is 81.61 percent in Dholpur, followed by Jhalawar, Tonk and Dausa. Table 2.33: Milk Sold By the Household ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Items Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jhalawar Rajsamand Tonk Percent Total ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CIG member Households Yes 4.88 13.33 54.24 80.00 61.90 7.89 45.00 41.97 183 Total 41 90 59 85 63 38 60 436 436 Non-CIG member Households Yes 7.89 3.95 34.78 81.61 62.79 28.93 44.74 35.88 183 Total 76 76 69 87 43 121 38 510 510 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Milk sale is a regular source of cash flow into a poor household. Table 2.34 shows that milk is sold to three buyers viz., locally to milk vendors, cooperative dairy and private dairy. There are 136 CIG households selling 40
milk and the average annual income earned from selling milk is Rs.5400 in Baran and Rs.21395 in Dholpur at the local level, while the milk sold to cooperative dairy fetches on an average Rs.11115 in Jhalawar and Rs.39000 in Dholpur, though fewer households sell milk to cooperative dairy. Private dairy also returns lower average income from milk sale. It ranges between Rs.3600 in Baran to Rs.21288 in Dausa. So highest average income earned is from cooperative followed by local vendor and then private dairy. In case of non-CIG households, large number sell to local vendors followed by private dairy and then cooperative dairy. The income earned is also in the same pattern. There are however inter-district variations. Table 2.34: Milk Sold (Rs.pa) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- District Local Coop Private Local Coop Private CIG Households Nn-CIG Households ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baran Mean 5400 3600 6650 19200 14460 N 1 1 3 1 2 Churu Mean 11900 15200 9970 5760 6600 N 3 3 6 1 2 Dausa Mean 16602 21024 21288 12266 11658 16726 N 11 11 10 14 4 5 Dholpur Mean 21395 39600 16376 10800 N 64 2 70 1 Jhalawar Mean 8471 11115 15300 9815 7680 8000 N 32 2 4 19 5 3 Rajsamand Mean 10800 9734 12860 N 3 33 2 Tonk Mean 15773 20340 11760 16023 8050 N 22 4 1 15 2 Total Mean 16496 20893 15876 13496 10028 12418 N 136 22 22 155 12 15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Liquidation of Assets As the poor households are cash starved mostly, then in case of emergency must be liquidating their assets like house, land, animals etc. Table 2.35 shows that major causes of liquidation are illness, debt, social ceremonies’ expenses and purchase of other durable assets. House liquidation is reported by only two CIG households- one each in Baran and Dholpur. It was disposed off by 8 non-CIG households in Dausa, Dholpur, Jhalawar and Tonk. Land has been disposed off by 17 CIG households in Baran, Churu, Dausa, Dholpur and Rajsamand and the major reason has been debt and illness. In case of non-CIG households, 103 households sold the land for social ceremonies, debt, and illness in Baran, Churu, Dausa, Dholpur, Jhalwar, Rajsamnd and Tonk. Churu and Dholpur have more households selling land compared to other districts. There are 102 CIG households which have sold their animals to tide over crisis in the family due to purchase an asset, repay the debt and pay for illness and social ceremonies. This has not been done by non-CIG households; only in Baran, Dholpur and Tonk it happened. Not many households have sold jewellery; a few households in Baran and Dholpur, Tonk and Dausa. This shows that of the seven districts, some are more vulnerable and even DPIP intervention has not been able to help retain assets with these poor families. Table 2.35: Reasons for Liquidation of Assets -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reasons Baran Dholpur Total 41
Page 1 and 2: Impact Assessment of the District P
Page 3 and 4: limited too. Panchayati Raj Institu
Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1 Introduction This study i
Page 7 and 8: for skill up-gradation in the Non-f
Page 9 and 10: MART - Hat ( Development ): MART Ne
Page 11 and 12: * Ensure transparency, widespread i
Page 13 and 14: The quantitative evaluation seeks t
Page 15 and 16: Survey Instruments The survey has a
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 2 CIG and Non-CIG Household
Page 19 and 20: NON-CIG Member Households Nuclear 8
Page 21 and 22: Table 2.7: Main Occupation of the H
Page 23 and 24: -----------------------------------
Page 25 and 26: 40 3 7 10 50 2 6 8 60 5 3 2 1 1 12
Page 27 and 28: -----------------------------------
Page 29 and 30: Table 2.16: Source of Irrigation --
Page 31 and 32: Yes 56.76 100 63.94 47.78 67.88 69.
Page 33 and 34: Months Baran Churu Dausa Dholpur Jh
Page 35 and 36: Percent 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Page 37 and 38: CIG member Households Yes 59.62 60.
Page 39: Table 2.30: Whether Animals are cov
Page 43 and 44: Across districts, the percentage of
Page 45 and 46: For any crisis, financial assistanc
Page 47 and 48: N 59 66 68 53 Total Mean 4010 4007
Page 49 and 50: N 3 5 1 2 Churu Mean 3045 20501 741
Page 51 and 52: was no such household in Baran, Dau
Page 53 and 54: Baran Mean 4398 4451 5935 35 N 9 2
Page 55 and 56: Per capita income from famine works
Page 57 and 58: Dholpur Mean 1 1 2 1 45 -6 N 74 107
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 2.1: Per Capita Agricultur
Page 61 and 62: Appendix 2.9: Per Capita Land Lease
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 2.16: Bajra Production in
Page 65 and 66: Chapter 3 Household Level Changes:
Page 67 and 68: Dausa 95.6 4.4 85.7 13.0 1.3 Dholpu
Page 69 and 70: Households and DPIP Sub-projects It
Page 71 and 72: Table 3.13: Relation with SPAs Meet
Page 73 and 74: Income Access Social sabha Income A
Page 75 and 76: Agriculture Income The average inco
Page 77 and 78: Some households also still engage t
Page 79 and 80: though this is more so in drought p
Page 81 and 82: Rs.3768 for APL household. For non-
Page 83 and 84: APL BPL APL BPL APL BPL Baran 15 68
Page 85 and 86: BLS 2001 BLS 2007 NBLS 2007 APL BPL
Page 87 and 88: Traditional Yackak Income Rs. Rs. 1
Page 89 and 90: Other Incomes Rs. Rs. 50000 45000 4
Page 91 and 92:
Expenditure of Footwear Rs. Rs. 160
Page 93 and 94:
Expenditure on Social Obligations R
Page 95 and 96:
Expenditure on Electricty Rs. 2500
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3.42: Average Household size
Page 99 and 100:
Area Cultivable Bighas 35 30 25 20
Page 101 and 102:
Appendices Appendix Table 3.1: Deci
Page 103 and 104:
Appendix Table 3.5: Decision on Par
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix Table 3.8: Decision on Usi
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix Table 3.12: Decision on Me
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix Table 3.16: Who Does the C
Page 111 and 112:
BPL Baran 51.28 10.26 15.02 1.83 Ch
Page 113 and 114:
Male Female Boy Girl APL Baran 41.6
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix Table 3.33: Who in the Vil
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 4 Sub- Project Activities:
Page 119 and 120:
Type of SPA In Baran district, 65.5
Page 121 and 122:
Were the villagers informed about t
Page 123 and 124:
is reported in 10.34 percent groups
Page 125 and 126:
Is there any conversation between t
Page 127 and 128:
It may also be pointed out the sele
Page 129 and 130:
Village Nayagaon, located 25 kms fr
Page 131 and 132:
• It was also felt that verificat
Page 133 and 134:
• Every three months there should
Page 135 and 136:
• Group formation should be done
Page 137 and 138:
The main source of income besides,
Page 139 and 140:
Subsidy should be reduced and shoul
Page 141 and 142:
Type of Household Man Women Differe
Page 143 and 144:
Who Takes the Decisions on Sending
Page 145 and 146:
Who Takes the Decisions on Particip
Page 147 and 148:
Who Takes the Decisions on Having A
Page 149 and 150:
APL Baran 100.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 1 D
Page 151 and 152:
Dausa 19.2 15.0 34.2 12.5 5.8 0.0 1
Page 153 and 154:
Dausa 30.8 15.0 24.2 11.7 3.3 0.0 1
Page 155 and 156:
If your Children are not enrolled i
Page 157 and 158:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 159 and 160:
Compared to 5 years ago has the hou
Page 161 and 162:
Has the paternal worked on your fie
Page 163 and 164:
Tonk 22.2 77.8 180 17.6 82.4 990 BP
Page 165 and 166:
Tonk 41.7 58.3 300 63.2 36.8 1650 D
Page 167 and 168:
Does the CIG members borrow from yo
Page 169 and 170:
Do Participate in Caste Panchayat M
Page 171 and 172:
Roles and Responsibilities in the H
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Tables on Asset Position of CIG and
Page 179 and 180:
Tonk N 6 4 10 8 Total N 23 41 57 94
show all

Impact Assessment of the District Poverty Initiative Project Rajasthan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?