15.03.2015 Views

REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository

REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository

REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A cost benefit ratio of 2.9 to 1 is considered<br />

exceptionally good for dryland agriculture.<br />

These fertilizer results should be used to encourage<br />

the Tunisian technicians and farmers<br />

to utilize more nitrogen in the future in order<br />

to increase their production and income.<br />

Breeding of New Varieties<br />

Results from the first crop year 1968-69<br />

following initiation of the Tunisian Accelerated<br />

Cereal Production Project showed the varieties<br />

Inia and Tobari to be the best suited for commercial<br />

production from the standpoint of yield<br />

and general adaptation. Siete Cerros yields well<br />

in certain northern regions, however, its high<br />

susceptibility to Septoria necessarily limits<br />

production to the drier irrigated regions of the<br />

south.<br />

Distribution and cultivation of Penjamo<br />

and Tobari were encouraged during 1969-70<br />

throughout the higher rainfall zones of the<br />

north to provide added protection against<br />

the threat of Septoria. Jaral has been eliminated<br />

from multiplication due to its extreme<br />

earliness causing extreme loss from bird damage.<br />

Although Inia continues to produce the<br />

highest average yields of all commercial varieties<br />

being grown, its susceptibility to mildew,<br />

Septoria and increasing prevalence of leaf rust<br />

will warrant replacement with new varieties as<br />

soon as possible.<br />

This year there were micro-yield trials, involving<br />

115 bread and durum wheats from the<br />

breeding pTogram, distributed and evaluated<br />

in several locations in the major wheat growing<br />

regions of Tunisia. The outstanding lines<br />

in these tests combining good disease resistance<br />

and yields equivalent to or better than<br />

the best commercial variety Inia are listed in<br />

Table W19.. Outstading lines from these trials<br />

will be submitted to the production section for<br />

inclusion in the widely distributed varietal demonstrations<br />

during the coming year.<br />

The breeding gene pool was expanded this<br />

year with further introduction of lines and<br />

varieties from Mexico, Pakistan, India, U.S.A.,<br />

Lebanon, Portugal and the Netherlands. The<br />

majority of the materials were segregating I1nes<br />

from the first three mentioned countries. Lines<br />

from the latter four countries were obtained<br />

for testing against specific diseases and insects.<br />

Approximately 5,000 lines of bread<br />

wheat in Screening and Observation Nurseries<br />

were tested at the National Institute of Agriculture<br />

adjacent to Tunis and also at Sou<br />

Salem Research Station 130 kilometers west<br />

of Tunis. The Sou Salem station is a good<br />

site for selection of resistance to Septoria and<br />

stripe rust. Tunis, being located on the sea,<br />

normally has good development of mildew as<br />

well as stem and leaf rust and thus facilitates<br />

selection. Development of diseases within the<br />

breeding nurseries are also encouraged with<br />

intermittent irrigations throughout the crop<br />

season using a sprinkler system. Table W20<br />

lists the crosses within the Screening Nurseries<br />

that consistently looked good from the stand-<br />

TABLE W19. The 25 most promising bread wheat<br />

lines identified in yield tests conducted in Tunis<br />

during the 1969·70 season.<br />

Pedigree<br />

Yield<br />

qx/ha<br />

%~<br />

Inia<br />

Inla ..... x Napo 63<br />

22403·6M-4Y·l M·l Y·OM·OY 41.4 135.4<br />

NDI02 x P4160"z·Son 64<br />

19879·1T·1T·3T 40.2 131.4<br />

(Son 64·Y50"z x Gto) Inl......<br />

23528·7M·1T·IMIY.OM.oy 38.3 125.2<br />

NDI02 x P4160"z·$on 64<br />

19879·1T·l K·7T.2T 3'.1 124.4<br />

(Son 64·Y50"z x Gto) Inla .....<br />

23528·7M·lT·1 M-6y.oM.oy 38.0 123.8<br />

12300 x Bz•.<br />

21014-4M·3R·3M·1R 37.8 123.6<br />

(Son 64-TzPP x Y54) (Son 64-Y50 z<br />

x Gto) 22346·39M·1Y.IR 37.0 120.9<br />

Inla ..... x N.po 63<br />

23398.1 OM· 1R.2M·l Y·l 37.0 120.9<br />

TzPP·Son 64 x 12300<br />

21364-13M·1Y·l M 36.7 119.8<br />

Inia ..... x (Son 64-TzPP x Y54)<br />

2239G-20M·9R·2M.2Y 36.7 119.'<br />

PI ..... (YT54 x N1G-B) 21/1C N68 36.1 117.7<br />

Mentana x Thatcher x R_ard x Hope.<br />

Tim.teln x R_ard x Hope x Thatcher 35.8 117.1<br />

Bb ..... 23584·26Y·2M·1Y·OM.oy<br />

8b # 2 35.7 116.8<br />

CIANO ..... x Inla 66 23941.14Y.2 35.5 116.1<br />

Bluebird ..... 235.4-20M 35.4 115.7<br />

Bluebird .....235.4-37Y·2M.2y.oM 35.1 114.7<br />

Sonalike 35.0 114.2<br />

CIANO x Inla 23959·32T·lM.3Y.OM 34.9 114.1<br />

Bluebird .....<br />

23584-303M·IY·17M·Iy.oM·OY 34.8 113.6<br />

LR ..... x HuaR HD1675 34.6 113.1<br />

Bluebird ..... 23584-10OM·08-4M.OY 34.4 112.3<br />

LR 64-P4160"E 33.9 110.7<br />

Son 64 x KI. Rend (BT 2292)<br />

19975·68Y·tJ·1Y·tJ·5Y·1T 33.6 109.6<br />

Son 64 x KI. Rend (BT 2296)<br />

19975-68Y·tJ·6Y·tJ·3Y 33.2 108.4<br />

Inl. (Check) 30.6 100.0<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!