15.03.2015 Views

REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository

REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository

REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The varieties and rates of planting were<br />

as follows:<br />

Variety<br />

Caribbean composite<br />

Tuxpeiio composite<br />

Guerrero 221 (Pepitilla)<br />

Oaxaca 179 (Zapalote Chico)<br />

Row width (em)<br />

Rates of Planting (plants/ha)<br />

54,00067,000100,000167,000<br />

Single plant hills 20 cm apart were used<br />

at all row widths.<br />

Data for one complete year are now available.<br />

The variety of Zapalote Chico completed<br />

three cycles of growth and flowered in<br />

its fourth planting at the end of one year. The<br />

other three varieties were in the grain-filling<br />

stage of their third cycle at the end of one year.<br />

In general, yields seem to increase with increased<br />

plant populations, unless the percentage,of<br />

ear-bearing plants decreased with increase<br />

populations, as occurred in the first<br />

cycle for Pepitilla, the Caribbean Composite<br />

and the Tuxpeno Composite.<br />

Zapalote Chico, at 167,000 plants/ha, produced<br />

14 tons of grain in the first three cycles.<br />

This variety completed an additional one-half<br />

of a growth cycle in the first year of the experiment,<br />

which suggests that its annual production<br />

will probably approach the maximum<br />

annual grain production reported in the tropics<br />

(see <strong>CIMMYT</strong> Annual Report 1967-68, p.<br />

43). The Zapalote Chico used in this experiment<br />

is an unimproved collection. It is very<br />

early and short in stature.<br />

These results underline the need for additional<br />

study of different plant types in association<br />

with the appropriate cultural practices<br />

necessary for expression of their full yield<br />

potential:<br />

Selection For Root Strength<br />

x<br />

X<br />

X<br />

92<br />

x<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

75<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

50<br />

X<br />

30<br />

Root lodging is a major problem in all<br />

corn-growing areas of the world. When not<br />

~aused by disease and/or insect attack, lodg­<br />

Ing can generally be traced to an inadequate<br />

root system. One approach to development<br />

of populations with a high degree of resistance<br />

to root lodging is the selection of plants showing<br />

the highest pulling resistance.<br />

The first <strong>CIMMYT</strong> study in this direction<br />

consisted of a mass selection program for root<br />

strength, initiated in Roque, Guanajuato, Mexico<br />

in 1969. The "Late Interracial Composite"<br />

was used at population levels of 25,000 and<br />

50,000 plants/ha. Root strength was measured<br />

by pulling the root from the soil using a tripod,<br />

a Chinese finger, and a tensiometer to indicate<br />

the force required.<br />

Preliminary analysis of the data collected<br />

seems to indicate that there is some useful<br />

genetic variation for this character. Seed from<br />

about five percent of the plants showing highest<br />

pulling resistance will be used to form a balanced<br />

composite for the next cycle of selection.<br />

Photoperiod Studies<br />

The experiments reported here summarize<br />

a preliminary attempt to pinpoint some important<br />

growth responses, and environmental<br />

factors producing these responses, when experimental<br />

conditions are changed over latitude<br />

and altitude.<br />

Two varieties of each of seven Mexican<br />

race~ of maize were planted in Tepalcingo,<br />

Tlaltlzapan, and Roque, Mexico, at a number<br />

of dates throughout 1968 and 1969. Six of<br />

these races are adapted to altitudes between<br />

1,000-1,800 meters. The seventh race, Zapalote<br />

Chico, is adapted to lower elevations.<br />

Two improved varieties were included each<br />

year as checks.<br />

TABLE 19. Sites, dates of planting, observed<br />

daylength at planting dates, and mean maximum<br />

and minimum temperatures during the 30 days<br />

following planting.<br />

No. of<br />

5 i t e Plantings<br />

Mean temperatures<br />

Planting Observed ' • for 30 days after<br />

Date Daylength planting ( °C)'<br />

Max.<br />

Min.<br />

Roque, Gto. April 21 12h 36' 29.2 10.3<br />

Roque, Gto. 2 May 21 12h 57' 30.0 12.6<br />

Roque, Gto. 3 June 21 13h 12' 26.7 13.4<br />

Tepalcingo,<br />

Mor. 4 Oct. llh 31' 32.5 15.0<br />

Tepalcingo,<br />

Mor. 1968 5 Nov. 1 11 h 04' 30.4 12.2<br />

Tlaltizapan,<br />

Mor. 1969<br />

Tepalcingo,<br />

Mor. 1968 6 Dec. 10h 43' 29.2 10.5<br />

Tlaltizapan,<br />

Mor. 1969<br />

Tlaltizapan,<br />

Mor. 7 Dec. 21 10h 41' 30.1 8.8<br />

1 Observed daylength is period between the times when the sun's<br />

disc was half below the horizon in the morning and evening<br />

when observed from the site of planting.<br />

• Observed daylengths and mean temperatures are for 1 year<br />

only on plantings numbered 4 and 7. For other planting dates<br />

the values are means of 2 years data.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!