REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository
REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository
REPORT - Search CIMMYT repository
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
obvious from these data: (1) apparently earto-row<br />
selection was slightly more effective<br />
than was stratified mass selection in both populations<br />
at. both plant population levels, and<br />
(2) for the Composite Chalqueno 61, either<br />
method of selection was more effective at the<br />
43,000 plant rate, than at the 63,000 planting<br />
rate.<br />
Although it is readily apparent that both<br />
of the methods of selection compared in this<br />
project were effective in increasing yield,<br />
earlier investigators ha'(e reported certain undesirable<br />
side effects when selection is based<br />
principally on the basis of yield. Data from<br />
this study, bearing on this question, are summarized<br />
in Table 16.<br />
These data indicate that, in addition to<br />
yield, the corns have been improved in respect<br />
to ear rots (the percentage of rotted ears decreased<br />
with either method in both populations).<br />
Also, improved were the characters<br />
tillers-with ears and ears-per-plant, both of<br />
which are, in part, another measure of yield.<br />
Both methods of selection, however, as<br />
practiced in these studies, resulted in an increase<br />
in days-to-flower, ear height and lodging.<br />
In most cases, the plant breeder would<br />
consider such changes as undesirable.<br />
As reported here last year, studies are underway<br />
to determine whether manipulation of<br />
the environment under which the selection is<br />
practiced could reduce the magnitude of these<br />
undersirable indirect responses.<br />
TABLE 16. Percen t changes in various characters in two populations as effected by stratified ma••<br />
selection and ear-to-row selection for yield.<br />
I<br />
..<br />
e c<br />
-u<br />
._ 0<br />
Method. ,..-<br />
Character In % of orlglna' population<br />
u<br />
Population of ¥<br />
Days to Tillers Ear Ears/ Rotten<br />
Selection 1 ~;X Yield<br />
Lodging<br />
0 ... Flower with ears Height Plant Ears<br />
Z 0<br />
Composite Chalque;;o 61 Mass 5 + 22.1 +6 + 3.6 + 12 + 14 + 13 - 4.7<br />
Ear-tOorow 4 + 24.5 +6 +2.9 + 13 +13 + 14 - 6.0<br />
Mexico Group 10 Mass 5 + 21.5 +6 + 9.7 + 6 + 2 + 24 - 4.1<br />
Ear·tOorow 4 + 22.2 +4 + 5.0 + 4 + 2 + 12 - 1.6<br />
Final cycle of selection compared to hybrid controls.<br />
TABLE 17. Yields of Dry Ear Corn and other agronomic traits comparing Stratified Ma•• Selection<br />
by weight (W) versus prolificacy (P) in Composite II Celaya and Puebla Group I. Three year average.<br />
(1967, 1968, 1969). 20 replications per year. EI Roque, Guanajuato, Mexico.<br />
Population Cycle Method<br />
Ylerd Ears/l00 Tillers/I00 % Ear Height Days to<br />
tons/ha Plants Planu Lodging ( meters) Flo_r<br />
Composite<br />
Ceraya II 0 6.1 96 21 12 2.03 81<br />
W 6.3 97 25 10 1.99 82<br />
P 6.4 97 18 9 2.03 82<br />
2 W 7.0 111 39 16 2.09 84<br />
P 6.9 108 34 13 2.10 84<br />
3 W 7.2 110 43 15 2.13 84<br />
P 7.3 118 48 16 2.14 85<br />
Puebla<br />
Gpo. I 0 6.2 98 26 48 2.28 87<br />
W 7.5 112 36 40 2.31 86<br />
P 7.1 111 40 38 2.22 86<br />
2 W 8.2 125 55 42 2.29 87<br />
P 7.8 115 39 39 2.28 87<br />
H·366<br />
Control 7.4 114 7 13 2.29 88<br />
29