22.03.2015 Views

1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial

1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial

1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Modelling</strong> Wind Erosion and Dust Emission on Vegetated Surfaces 139<br />

Figure 7.1 The Jornada ‘scraped site’ shown here in a 1999 low-altitude airborne visible/infrared<br />

spectroradiometer (AVIRIS) image with resolution <strong>of</strong> ∼5 m. This site proves that<br />

wind erosion can affect ecosystem stability in this ecosystem. It has experienced an average<br />

deflation rate <strong>of</strong> 1.8 cm yr –1 (Gillette and Chen, 2001) and plant-available N and P have been<br />

reduced by 89% and 78%, respectively (Okin et al., 2001b). No vegetation has regrown on<br />

<strong>the</strong> scraped site itself. The vegetation community downwind <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site has changed from a<br />

grassland to a shrubland due to burial, abrasion and leaf stripping from saltating particles from<br />

<strong>the</strong> scraped site itself (Okin et al., 2001a) and plant-available N and P in surface soils in <strong>the</strong><br />

downwind area have been reduced by 82% and 62%, respectively (Okin et al., 2001b)<br />

in <strong>the</strong> topmost soil layer is inhibited. The seedbank may also be depleted in <strong>the</strong> winnowed<br />

surface soils (A. van Rooyen, personal communication). Thus perennial grasses are killed,<br />

new vegetation growth is suppressed and shrubs, where established, gain a competitive<br />

edge. Creation <strong>of</strong> an erosive discontinuity in a mixed shrub/grass ecosystem accelerates <strong>the</strong><br />

conversion <strong>of</strong> grassland to shrubland.<br />

7.1.2 Where Does <strong>the</strong> Dust Come from?<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> desert dust, it is <strong>of</strong>ten unclear in detail where it is produced and<br />

what role humans play in mediating its production. Sensors such as TOMS can be used to<br />

directly observe dust in <strong>the</strong> atmosphere using methods such as <strong>the</strong> TOMS aerosol index<br />

(e.g. Prospero, 1999), but current technologies do not allow unique identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loci<br />

due to <strong>the</strong>ir coarse resolution and, in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> TOMS, because <strong>of</strong> problems in observing<br />

<strong>the</strong> lower levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atmosphere. Because <strong>of</strong> this, controversy remains about <strong>the</strong> extent to<br />

which land use contributes to <strong>the</strong> atmospheric mineral dust. Recent work by Prospero et al.<br />

(2002) and Ginoux et al. (2001) suggests that <strong>the</strong> overwhelming majority <strong>of</strong> desert dust<br />

comes from closed basins in arid areas related to now-dry or ephemeral lakes. They argue<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r that humans do not significantly perturb <strong>the</strong> dust cycle, a conclusion supported by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!