1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
186 <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
At wavelengths around 4 µm in <strong>the</strong> MIR terrestrial atmospheric window (3–5 µm), <strong>the</strong><br />
exponent b has a value equal to 4, whilst <strong>the</strong> multiplier a has a value <strong>of</strong> 3 × 10 −9 . Expanding<br />
this relationship to represent a fire ‘hotspot’ pixel containing n subpixel <strong>the</strong>rmal components<br />
<strong>of</strong> fractional area A n and temperature T n (which may be <strong>the</strong> different smouldering and<br />
flaming parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fire), provides:<br />
L h,MIR = aε MIR<br />
n∑<br />
i=1<br />
A n T 4<br />
n (3)<br />
where L MIR,h and ε MIR are <strong>the</strong> hot ‘fire’ pixel spectral radiance and surface spectral emissivity<br />
in <strong>the</strong> appropriate MIR spectral band.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> same modelled fire activity within a pixel, <strong>the</strong> energy emitted over all wavelengths<br />
is given by Stefan’sLaw:<br />
FRE TRUE = A sampl · εσ<br />
n∑<br />
i=1<br />
A n T 4<br />
n (4)<br />
where FRE TRUE is <strong>the</strong> Fire Radiative Energy (J s −1 ) emitted over all wavelength, A sampl is<br />
<strong>the</strong> ground-pixel area (m 2 ), ε is <strong>the</strong> surface emissivity averaged over all wavelengths, σ is<br />
<strong>the</strong> Stefan–Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 10 −8 Js −1 m −2 K −4 ).<br />
Equating (3) and (4) provides <strong>the</strong> following equation relating FRE to <strong>the</strong> MIR spectral<br />
radiance recorded at <strong>the</strong> fire pixel:<br />
FRE MIR = A sampl · σ.ε<br />
L MIR,h (5)<br />
a · ε MIR<br />
Since L MIR,h represents <strong>the</strong> MIR radiance from <strong>the</strong> fire only, when analysing real remotely<br />
sensed data this should be calculated by subtracting <strong>the</strong> background MIR radiance L MIR,bg<br />
(estimated from neighbouring non-fire pixels) from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fire pixel (L MIR,h ). Langaas<br />
(1995) suggests that for larger wildfires (<strong>the</strong> type most likely to be analysed via moderateresolution<br />
satellite imagery) <strong>the</strong> flames can be assumed to radiate as black or grey bodies<br />
(i.e., ε = ε MIR ), which we suggest is a reasonable assumption for our purposes, especially<br />
so since, when viewing from above, <strong>the</strong> hot surface material will form <strong>the</strong> background to<br />
any observation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual flames <strong>the</strong>mselves. Thus, <strong>the</strong> emissivity terms are removed<br />
from <strong>the</strong> equation, and setting A sampl equal to <strong>the</strong> 1 km 2 pixel area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MODIS 3.9 µm<br />
channel provides <strong>the</strong> algorithm for estimate FRE from MIR radiances recorded at MODIS<br />
fire pixels:<br />
FRE = 1.89 × 10 7 (L MIR − L MIR,bg ) (6)<br />
where spectral radiance has units <strong>of</strong> W m −2 sr −1 µm −1 and FRE units <strong>of</strong> J s −1 or Watts.<br />
Wooster et al. (2003) have compared <strong>the</strong> FRE estimates derived via equation (6) to<br />
those from <strong>the</strong> empirically derived equation provided by Kaufman et al. (1998a), which is<br />
used in <strong>the</strong> MODIS fire products (Kaufman et al., 1998b), and <strong>the</strong> results show excellent<br />
agreement (r 2 = 0.99). However, <strong>the</strong> physically based nature <strong>of</strong> equation (6) allows it to<br />
be easily adapted for use with o<strong>the</strong>r satellite-based sensor working in <strong>the</strong> 3–5 µm atmospheric<br />
window. The Hot Spot Recognition System (HSRS), carried by <strong>the</strong> Bi-spectral<br />
InfraRed Detection (BIRD) small experimental satellite (Briess et al., 2003), is one such<br />
sensor and Figure 9.4 shows a comparison <strong>of</strong> MODIS and HSRS MIR images for one <strong>of</strong>