1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Index 271<br />
ICESat<br />
estimation <strong>of</strong> topographic variables 265<br />
study <strong>of</strong> cryosphere a primary objective 14, 31–2<br />
IFOV (instantaneous field <strong>of</strong> view) 43, 44<br />
image banding<br />
causes <strong>of</strong> 129–33<br />
simulation <strong>of</strong> random error 129, 130, 131<br />
main problem, how to deal with 131–3<br />
adding additional tie points, main effects 131–2,<br />
131<br />
method based on using ground control points<br />
132–3, 133<br />
refinement <strong>of</strong> stitching process 132, 132<br />
in systematic surface error 126–7<br />
interferometric Syn<strong>the</strong>tic Aperture Radar (InSAR)<br />
18–19<br />
topography from 22–3, 24<br />
inundation extent 82–5<br />
remote sensing systems 82–5, 83<br />
air photo datasets 82<br />
airborne optical platforms 82<br />
satellite optical platforms 82<br />
Syn<strong>the</strong>tic Aperture Radar (SAR) 83–5<br />
hydraulic models 82<br />
validation 96<br />
Jornada del Muerto Basin, New Mexico<br />
wind erosion 138–9, 139<br />
Chihuahuan Desert 140–1, 140<br />
mesquite dunelands 143, 152<br />
wind erosion and dust flux 152, 153<br />
SWEMO 145, 146–53<br />
model, operation 148–53<br />
soil data 145, 146, 146<br />
vegetation data 146–7, 147, 147<br />
wind data 147–8, 148<br />
Kalman filter 70<br />
ensemble Kalman filter 255–6<br />
extended Kalman filter 255, 256, 258–9<br />
kernel-based reclassification techniques 203<br />
L-band radar, use in canopy penetration 84<br />
L-band (satellite) missions, potential 60, 66<br />
land cover, and land use 202<br />
land data assimilation systems (LDAS) 59–60, 69–70,<br />
247–9, 247<br />
multiple land surface models under one system<br />
248–9, 249, 252<br />
applications 256–9<br />
precipitation forcing data 256–8, 258<br />
SMMR-derived surface soil moisture data<br />
258–9<br />
atmospheric forcing fields 256, 257<br />
components <strong>of</strong> 249–56, 252<br />
data assimilation 254–6<br />
land surface simulations 249–51<br />
observations and observation-based data<br />
251–4<br />
uncoupled vs.coupled modelling systems 251<br />
future directions 259<br />
global LDAS (GLDAS) 248–9, 251–2<br />
land information system 249<br />
North American LDAS (NLDAS) 248, 251<br />
use <strong>of</strong> existing Land Surface Models 248<br />
primary goal 248<br />
land form change, application <strong>of</strong> remote sensing to<br />
110<br />
land information system (LIS) 249, 251<br />
land surface models 12<br />
assimilation <strong>of</strong> soil moisture remote sensing data<br />
into 255<br />
coupled with microwave emission models 60–3<br />
to be used in LDAS 248, 249, 250–1<br />
catchment-based LSM 250, 259<br />
Community Land Model (CLM) 251<br />
Mosaic LSM 250<br />
NOAH LSM 250–1<br />
use <strong>of</strong> probability density function (PDF) with 71<br />
land surface state data 253–4<br />
snow variables 254<br />
soil moisture remote sensing 253<br />
surface temperature remote sensing 253<br />
land use, and atmospheric mineral dust 139<br />
land use and transport modelling framework 231–3<br />
demand elements 232<br />
important features for monitoring environmental<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> traffic emissions 233<br />
land use system 231–2<br />
transport model, based on trade pattern between<br />
zones 232–3<br />
modal split procedure 233<br />
Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) 82, 203, 229<br />
large catchments, problems <strong>of</strong> modelling erosion and<br />
deposition in 158<br />
LDAS see land data assimilation systems (LDAS)<br />
LiDAR<br />
high spatial-density airborne LiDAR 201<br />
topographical mapping 86<br />
r.m.s. errors 92<br />
LiDAR data, variogram analysis <strong>of</strong> 92–3<br />
LiDAR and SAR data<br />
coupled to a numerical flood model 5<br />
used in flood inundation modelling 12,<br />
79–106<br />
LiDAR segmentation system 88, 89, 90–1, 90, 96<br />
advantage <strong>of</strong> segmentation 91<br />
LISFLOOD-FP inundation model 93, 96, 97<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 98–100, 99<br />
model uncertainty 100