22.03.2015 Views

1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial

1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial

1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Coupled Land Surface and Microwave Emission Models 67<br />

Figure 4.2 Relationship between derived optical depth and Landsat-TM measured NDVI for<br />

15 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sites intensively monitored during SGP97 (redrawn from Burke et al., 2001a). The<br />

moral right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authors to be identified as <strong>the</strong> authors <strong>of</strong> such figure is asserted.<br />

to estimate <strong>the</strong> optical depth using equation (8), see, for example, Jackson et al. (1999).<br />

An alternative method is to use vegetation indices derived from visible wavelength satellite<br />

data. These two methods for deriving <strong>the</strong> optical depth can both potentially introduce<br />

significant errors into <strong>the</strong> retrieved soil moisture. For example, Burke et al. (2001a) used<br />

<strong>the</strong> Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to derive optical depths for selected<br />

sites intensively monitored during SGP97. They assumed that, at specific measurement sites,<br />

<strong>the</strong> only unknown in <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> measured soil moisture and measured<br />

microwave brightness temperature was <strong>the</strong> optical depth. They <strong>the</strong>n related <strong>the</strong> optical<br />

depth derived in this way to <strong>the</strong> local NDVI estimated by Landsat-TM (Figure 4.2). A linear<br />

function was fitted to this relationship, with 78% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variation in <strong>the</strong> derived optical depth<br />

explained by <strong>the</strong> variation in NDVI. Figure 4.2 also shows <strong>the</strong> 66% confidence intervals<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fitted relationship which correspond to one standard deviation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> optical depth,<br />

or approximately ±0.08. This empirical relationship was found to be dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microwave sensor used to measure brightness temperature (Burke et al.,<br />

2001a).<br />

The SMOS mission provides an opportunity to retrieve estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> optical depth as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> retrieval algorithm because it will measure brightness temperatures at multiple<br />

look-angles and both polarizations over similar areas at similar times. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

enough information for <strong>the</strong> proposed retrieval algorithm to retrieve both <strong>the</strong> near-surface<br />

soil water content and <strong>the</strong> optical depth. The proposed retrieval algorithm assumes that <strong>the</strong><br />

opacity coefficient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vegetation (equation 8) does not depend on ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> polarization<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> radiation or <strong>the</strong> look-angle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sensor. There is, however, some evidence that it<br />

depends on both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se radiometer characteristics (van de Griend and Owe, 1996; Lee<br />

et al., 2002b). Figure 4.3 shows <strong>the</strong> look-angle and polarization dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean<br />

opacity coefficient retrieved (using <strong>the</strong> method described by Lee et al. (2002b)) from <strong>the</strong><br />

time series <strong>of</strong> brightness temperatures given in Figures 4.1c and d, this time series having<br />

been calculated using <strong>the</strong> arguably more realistic extended Wilheit (1978) model. Values

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!