1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
1 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestrial Environment - Georeferencial
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
232 <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Environment</strong><br />
zones. A modal split procedure is used to allocate flows <strong>of</strong> goods and people from <strong>the</strong> land<br />
use model to each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> travel types available. A discrete choice, log linear regression<br />
framework is <strong>the</strong>n used to allocate flows to modes followed by an assignment procedure<br />
which converts <strong>the</strong> flows to vehicles and allocates <strong>the</strong>m to routes based on <strong>the</strong> shortest<br />
paths. This assignment defines an initial demand for use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transport network which<br />
can be compared with a measure <strong>of</strong> supply based on travel time, cost and congestion. A<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r iterative procedure is used to adjust <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> flows on <strong>the</strong> transport network<br />
until an equilibrium pattern is reached in which utility is maximized.<br />
As <strong>the</strong> model iterates through time, feedback effects between <strong>the</strong> land use and transport<br />
elements are incorporated. Land use adjustments take place according to <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> rents<br />
and transport adjustments are controlled by journey costs and accessibility. The explicit<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> land use and transport interaction is a particularly powerful feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
modelling framework.<br />
Given this structure <strong>the</strong> land use and transport model <strong>of</strong>fers two important features for<br />
monitoring <strong>the</strong> environmental impact <strong>of</strong> traffic emissions:<br />
First, it can generate estimates <strong>of</strong> traffic flow by vehicle type and speed for each link in <strong>the</strong><br />
regional transportation network. These variables represent primary data for calculating<br />
emissions.<br />
Second, it <strong>of</strong>fers an immensely flexible and powerful tool for predicting <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><br />
planning policy packages. Changes in transport policy such as new network links or<br />
improvements to capacity can be evaluated by modifying <strong>the</strong> network structure and<br />
attributes in <strong>the</strong> model. Policy changes affecting land use (e.g. permission for new settlements,<br />
industrial installations or controls on growth) can similarly be evaluated by<br />
adjusting <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> input-output matrix.<br />
The addition <strong>of</strong> an emissions impact framework to <strong>the</strong> land use and transport model<br />
thus provides a basis for evaluating <strong>the</strong> air quality outcomes <strong>of</strong> different planning policy<br />
packages.<br />
11.4 The Emissions Model<br />
The increasing importance <strong>of</strong> meeting air quality standards has led to a rapid growth in<br />
<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> models available for estimating emissions concentration and dispersion.<br />
Around 20 different modelling systems are identified by DETR (2000), giving rise to <strong>the</strong><br />
need for central government guidance on <strong>the</strong> basic principles, properties and performance<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se models. The important differentiating features appear to be level <strong>of</strong> detail, extent <strong>of</strong><br />
data, computational demands, complexity and, inevitably, cost. Validation <strong>of</strong> model results<br />
is a major issue and as yet, <strong>the</strong>re seems to be no guarantee that more detailed, complex<br />
models will give better results in all situations. The conventional wisdom for air quality<br />
modelling is thus to use a multi-stage approach in which low-cost, relatively simple models<br />
are used for screening. Where application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se models reveals potential air quality<br />
problems, more detailed, sophisticated models are used to make accurate assessments.<br />
Given <strong>the</strong> policy-based nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work conducted here it was felt appropriate to<br />
employ a modified version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emissions screening methodology currently published in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB, 1999). This approach was developed