258 <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Terrestrial</strong> <strong>Environment</strong> data (Plate 12). This is <strong>the</strong> first known use <strong>of</strong> actual satellite-derived soil moisture within an assimilation framework. 12.5 Future Directions The LDAS projects will continue to incorporate new model and observation information to improve land surface knowledge. The fourth LDAS model to be implemented soon is <strong>the</strong> Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSM) (Koster et al., 1998). The catchment model signifies a major advance for <strong>the</strong> following two reasons. First, <strong>the</strong> modelling framework will result in improved run<strong>of</strong>f prediction, and consequently, more realistic catchment-scale water balance. Second, <strong>the</strong> downward slope movement <strong>of</strong> moisture within <strong>the</strong> watershed will yield sub-catchment-scale surface and unsaturated-zone moisture variations, resulting in more realistic intra-catchment surface flux variation prediction. Improved run<strong>of</strong>f simulation will ultimately yield a more realistic continental stream flow from <strong>the</strong> land to <strong>the</strong> oceans, and similarly, <strong>the</strong> within-catchment surface flux variations will result in more representative catchment-average exchanges with <strong>the</strong> atmosphere. The significant increase in satellite observations is providing a global supply <strong>of</strong> atmosphere and land surface information available to improve land surface simulation and data assimilation. For example, higher spatial resolution data (to 1 km) will become available from MODIS and will include leaf area index (LAI), land surface temperature and surface albedo products. Also, improved global land cover datasets (to 1 km) will be updated every three months. New microwave sensors such as AMSR will permit improved precipitation estimation critical to LSM water and energy budgets. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> planned Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) will involve a satellite constellation that will enhance precipitation estimates to 3 hours temporally and to 4 km horizontal and 250 m vertical global cells. GPM should greatly improve land surface water and energy budget data, and <strong>the</strong> improved accuracy will benefit data assimilation. Enhanced modelling and observational data with expanded computer power will improve data assimilation in hydrological sciences. Previous developments <strong>of</strong> data assimilation in hydrological applications have lagged behind in comparison to atmospheric and ocean applications. However, <strong>the</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> emerging Earth science data coupled with hydrological land surface model physical improvements and computer capability will permit data assimilation to be more routinely implemented. Massively parallel computing techniques such as those developed by <strong>the</strong> Land Information System will support <strong>the</strong> near real-time data assimilation throughput demands. In this mode, users will have a web-based interface designed to facilitate broad and efficient information use for land, water and energy data assimilation. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Brian Cosgrove, Jon Gottschalck, Rolf Reichle, Jonathan Triggs and Matt Rodell for <strong>the</strong>ir inputs and paper review. We also thank Rolf Reichle, Chaojiao Sun and Jeffery Walker for inputs on data assimilation. We express gratitude to o<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LDAS team for <strong>the</strong>ir support: Christa Peters-Lidard, Jared Entin, Jon Radakovich, Mike
Land, Water and Energy Data Assimilation 259 Bosilovich, Urszula Jambor, Kristi Arsenault, Jesse Meng, Aaron Berg, Guiling Wang, Ken Mitchell, John Schaake, Eric Wood, Dennis Lettenmaier, Alan Robock and Jeff Basara. References Avissar, R. and Pielke, R., 1989, A parameterization <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology, Monthly Wea<strong>the</strong>r Review, 117, 2113– 2136. Basist, A. and Grody, N., 1997, Surface wetness and snow cover, AMS Annual Meeting, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>13th Conference on Hydrology, 190–193. Beven, K. and Kirkby, M., 1979, A physically-based variable contributing area model <strong>of</strong> basin hydrology, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 24, 43–69. Birkett, C.M., 1998, Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TOPEX NASA radar altimeter to <strong>the</strong> global monitoring <strong>of</strong> large rivers and wetlands, Water Resources Research, 34, 1223–1239. Bonan, G.B., 1998, The land surface climatology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NCAR land surface model coupled to <strong>the</strong> NCAR community climate mode, Journal <strong>of</strong> Climate, 11, 1307–1326. Bouttier, F., Mahfouf, J.-F. and Noilhan, J., 1993, Sequential assimilation <strong>of</strong> soil moisture from atmospheric low-level parameters. Part I: sensitivity and calibration studies, Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Meteorology, 32, 1335–1351. Callies, U., Rhodin, A. and Eppel, D.P., 1998, A case study on variational soil moisture analysis from atmospheric observations, Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, 212–213, 95–108. Calvet, J.-C., Noilhan, J. and Bessemoulin, P., 1998, Retrieving <strong>the</strong> root-zone soil moisture from surface soil moisture or temperature estimates: a feasibility study based on field measurements, Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Meteorology, 37, 371–386. Castelli, F., Entekhabi, D. and Caporali, E., 1999, Estimation <strong>of</strong> surface heat flux and an index <strong>of</strong> soil moisture using adjoint-state surface energy balance, Water Resources Research, 35, 3115–3125. Cline, D.W., Bales, R.C. and Dozier, J., 1998, Estimating <strong>the</strong> spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> snow in mountain basins using remote sensing and energy balance modeling, Water Resources Research, 34, 1275– 1285. Cohn, S.E., Da Silva, A., Guo, J., Sienkiewicz, M. and Lamich, D., 1998, Assessing <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> data selection with <strong>the</strong> DAO physical-space statistical analysis system, Monthly Wea<strong>the</strong>r Review, 126, 2913–2926. Crow, W.T. and Wood, E.F., 2003, The assimilation <strong>of</strong> remotely sensed soil brightness temperature imagery into a land-surface model using Ensemble Kalman filtering: a case study based on ESTAR measurements during SGP97, Advances in Water Resources, 26, 137–159. Daley, R., 1991, Atmospheric Data Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press). Derber, J.C., Parrish, D.F. and Lord, S.J., 1991, The new global operational analysis system at <strong>the</strong> National Meteorological Center, Wea<strong>the</strong>r Forecasting, 6, 538–547. Dickinson, R.E., Henderson-Sellers, A. and Kennedy, P.J., 1993, Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as coupled to <strong>the</strong> NCAR community climate model, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Eley, J., 1992, Summary <strong>of</strong> Workshop, Soil Moisture Modeling, Proceedings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NHRC Workshop held March 9–10, 1992, NHRI Symposium No. 9 Proceedings, Canada. Entekhabi, D., Nakamura, H. and Njoku, E.G., 1994, Solving <strong>the</strong> inverse problem for soil moisture and temperature pr<strong>of</strong>iles by sequential assimilation <strong>of</strong> multifrequency remotely sensed observations, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 438–448. Errico, R.M., 1999, Workshop on assimilation <strong>of</strong> satellite data, Bulletin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Meteorological Society, 80, 463–471. Famiglietti, J.S. and Wood, E.F., 1994, Multi-scale modeling <strong>of</strong> spatially-variable water and energy balance processes, Water Resources Research, 30, 3061–3078. Galantowicz, J.F., Entekhabi, D. and Njoku, E.G., 1999, Tests <strong>of</strong> sequential data assimilation for retrieving pr<strong>of</strong>ile soil moisture and temperature from observed L-band radiobrightness, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, 1860.
- Page 2 and 3:
Spatial Modelling of the Terrestria
- Page 4 and 5:
Copyright C○ 2004 John Wiley & So
- Page 6 and 7:
Contents List of Contributors Prefa
- Page 8 and 9:
Contributors Jonathan L. Bamber Sch
- Page 10 and 11:
List of Contributors xi George Perr
- Page 12 and 13:
xiv Preface in theory and applicati
- Page 14 and 15:
2 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestr
- Page 16 and 17:
4 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestr
- Page 18 and 19:
6 Spatial Modelling of the Terrestr
- Page 20 and 21:
Editorial: Spatial Modelling in Hyd
- Page 22 and 23:
Editorial: Spatial Modelling in Hyd
- Page 24 and 25:
2 Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics with
- Page 26 and 27:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 28 and 29:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 30 and 31:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 32 and 33:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 34 and 35:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 36 and 37:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 38 and 39:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 40 and 41:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 42 and 43:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 44 and 45:
Modelling Ice Sheet Dynamics by Sat
- Page 46 and 47:
36 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 48 and 49:
38 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 50 and 51:
40 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 52 and 53:
42 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 54 and 55:
44 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 56 and 57:
46 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 58 and 59:
48 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 60 and 61:
50 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 62 and 63:
52 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 64 and 65:
54 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 66 and 67:
56 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 68 and 69:
4 Using Coupled Land Surface and Mi
- Page 70 and 71:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 72 and 73:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 74 and 75:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 76 and 77:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 78 and 79:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 80 and 81:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 82 and 83:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 84 and 85:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 86 and 87:
Coupled Land Surface and Microwave
- Page 88 and 89:
80 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 90 and 91:
82 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 92 and 93:
84 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 94 and 95:
86 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 96 and 97:
88 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 98 and 99:
90 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 100 and 101:
92 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 102 and 103:
94 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 104 and 105:
96 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 106 and 107:
98 Spatial Modelling of the Terrest
- Page 108 and 109:
100 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 110 and 111:
102 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 112 and 113:
104 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 114 and 115:
106 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 116 and 117:
Editorial: Terrestrial Sediment and
- Page 118 and 119:
Editorial: Terrestrial Sediment and
- Page 120 and 121:
6 Remotely Sensed Topographic Data
- Page 122 and 123:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 124 and 125:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 126 and 127:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 128 and 129:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 130 and 131:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 132 and 133:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 134 and 135:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 136 and 137:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 138 and 139:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 140 and 141:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 142 and 143:
Remotely Sensed Topographic Data fo
- Page 144 and 145:
7 Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust E
- Page 146 and 147:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 148 and 149:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 150 and 151:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 152 and 153:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 154 and 155:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 156 and 157:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 158 and 159:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 160 and 161:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 162 and 163:
Modelling Wind Erosion and Dust Emi
- Page 164 and 165:
8 Near Real-Time Modelling of Regio
- Page 166 and 167:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 168 and 169:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 170 and 171:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 172 and 173:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 174 and 175:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 176 and 177:
High Low TSM Concentration Figure 8
- Page 178 and 179:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 180 and 181:
Near Real-Time Modelling of Regiona
- Page 182 and 183:
9 Estimation of Energy Emissions, F
- Page 184 and 185:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 186 and 187:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 188 and 189:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 190 and 191:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 192 and 193:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 194 and 195:
Figure 9.4 The upper row shows EOS
- Page 196 and 197:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 198 and 199:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 200 and 201:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 202 and 203:
Fireline Intensity and Biomass Cons
- Page 204 and 205:
PART III SPATIAL MODELLING OF URBAN
- Page 206 and 207:
200 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 208 and 209:
202 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 210 and 211:
204 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 212 and 213: 206 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 214 and 215: 208 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 216 and 217: 210 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 218 and 219: 212 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 220 and 221: 214 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 222 and 223: 216 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 224 and 225: 218 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 226 and 227: 220 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 228 and 229: 222 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 230 and 231: 224 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 232 and 233: 11 Modelling the Impact of Traffic
- Page 234 and 235: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 236 and 237: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 238 and 239: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 240 and 241: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 242 and 243: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 244 and 245: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 246 and 247: Modelling the Impact of Traffic Emi
- Page 248 and 249: PART IV CURRENT CHALLENGES AND FUTU
- Page 250 and 251: 246 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 252 and 253: 248 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 254 and 255: 250 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 256 and 257: 252 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 258 and 259: 254 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 260 and 261: 256 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 264 and 265: 260 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 266 and 267: 262 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 268 and 269: 264 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 270 and 271: 266 Spatial Modelling of the Terres
- Page 272 and 273: 268 Index Bi-spectral InfraRed Dete
- Page 274 and 275: 270 Index floodplain maps, UK 92 fl
- Page 276 and 277: 272 Index Long-Term Ecological Rese
- Page 278 and 279: 274 Index snow depth measurement ne
- Page 280: 276 Index urban land use in remotel