09.04.2015 Views

Electromagnetic Testing Chapter 3- Electromagnetic Testing

Electromagnetic Testing Chapter 3- Electromagnetic Testing

Electromagnetic Testing Chapter 3- Electromagnetic Testing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

If the diameter of a surface coil is much larger than the defect size, the defect<br />

will not be reliably detected. Likewise, if the vertical coil length is longer than<br />

the vertical component of the magnetic field, the excess coil length is not<br />

utilized. If the vertical coil length is much shorter than the vertical component<br />

of leakage flux, a weaker signal will be induced into the coil and the signal to<br />

noise will be lower. A greater electromotive force (emf) will be induced into<br />

the coil if the number of turns of wire is increased; this increases the<br />

inductance, coil impedance, and signal-to-noise ratio of the system. There are,<br />

of course, practical limitations to the number of turns of wire for optimum coil<br />

design. Improved flaw detection can result from using a soft iron or powdered<br />

iron core in the direction of the coil. The iron core tends to concentrate the<br />

lines of flux more effectively, coupling them into the coil and favorably<br />

increasing both coil impedance and output voltage. Finally, coil orientation is<br />

as important as defect orientation with regard to detecting flux leakage from<br />

defects. Surface coils are particularly effective for detecting flux leakage<br />

because they are normal to the surface and all surface defects produce a<br />

strong vertical or normal flux leakage pattern (see Figures 3.10 and 3.11).<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!