10.04.2015 Views

ghg-inventory-1990-2013

ghg-inventory-1990-2013

ghg-inventory-1990-2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

period is 2.2 tonnes C ha –1 yr –1 (Beets et al, <strong>2013</strong>). This rate is similar to previously<br />

reported rates of carbon sequestration in regenerating shrubland in New Zealand<br />

(Carswell et al, 2012; Trotter et al, 2005).<br />

Soil organic carbon<br />

Soil carbon stocks in land converted to post-1989 forest are estimated using a Tier 2<br />

method for mineral soils and a Tier 1 method for organic soils, as described in section<br />

6.3. The steady state mineral soil carbon stock in post-1989 forest is estimated to be<br />

91.92 tonnes C ha –1 (table 6.3.2).<br />

In the absence of country- and land-use specific data on the rate of change, the IPCC<br />

default method of a linear change over a 20-year period is used to estimate the change in<br />

SOC stocks between the original land use and planted forest land for any given period.<br />

For example, the soil carbon change associated with a land-use change from low<br />

producing grassland (soil carbon stock 105.98 tonnes C ha –1 ) to post-1989 planted forest<br />

(soil carbon stock 91.92 tonnes C ha –1 ) would be a loss of 14.06 tonnes C ha –1 over the<br />

20-year period.<br />

The IPCC default emission factor for organic soils under planted forest is<br />

0.68 tonnes C ha –1 per annum (table 6.3.3). This is also applied to organic soils on land<br />

converted to post-1989 forest.<br />

Quality assurance and quality control<br />

Quality-assurance and quality-control activities were conducted throughout the post-1989<br />

planted forest data capture and processing steps. These activities were associated with the<br />

following: <strong>inventory</strong> design (Brack, 2009; Moore and Goulding, 2005); acquisition of raw<br />

LiDAR data and LiDAR processing; checking eligibility of plots; independent audits of<br />

field plot measurements; data processing and modelling; regression analysis and doublesampling<br />

procedures (Woollens, 2009); and investigating LiDAR and ground plot<br />

co-location (Brack and Broadley, 2010). These activities, along with those undertaken<br />

within the post-1989 natural forest, are described in more detail in section 6.4.4.<br />

Non-CO 2 emissions for post-1989 forest<br />

Direct N 2 O emissions from nitrogen fertilisation of forest land and other land<br />

New Zealand activity data on nitrogen fertilisation is not currently disaggregated by land<br />

use and, therefore, all Direct N 2 O emissions from nitrogen fertilisation of forest land<br />

and other land are reported in the Agriculture sector under the subcategory, Direct<br />

soils emissions.<br />

6.4.3 Uncertainties and time-series consistency<br />

Emissions from Forest land are 3.1 per cent of New Zealand’s net emissions uncertainty<br />

in <strong>2013</strong> (annex 2). Forest land introduces 2.6 per cent uncertainty into the trend in the<br />

national total from <strong>1990</strong> to <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Pre-<strong>1990</strong> natural forest<br />

The uncertainty in mapping pre-<strong>1990</strong> natural forest is 5 per cent (table 6.4.7). Further<br />

details are given in section 6.2.5.<br />

Uncertainty in biomass carbon stock and stock change in New Zealand’s pre-<strong>1990</strong> natural<br />

forest is calculated using a published methodology designed specifically for this purpose<br />

(Holdaway et al, 2014c). The pre-<strong>1990</strong> natural forest plot network provides biomass<br />

carbon stock estimates that are within 95 per cent confidence intervals of 4.4 per cent of<br />

the mean (257.74 ± 11.33 tonnes C ha –1 ) for tall natural forest and 18.27 per cent of the<br />

250 New Zealand’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory <strong>1990</strong>–<strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!