View cases - Stewart McKelvey

a) Greater Vancouver Regional District Employees’ Union v.Greater Vancouver Regional District .....................................................159b) Assn. of Justices of the Peace of Ontario v.Ontario (Attorney General) ....................................................................164c) CKY-TV v. Communications, Energy and PaperworkersUnion of Canada, Local 816..................................................................167d) Bell v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission);Cooper v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) .................174C. Is Paragraph 15(1)(c) of the CHRA Justifiable Under Section 1 of theCharter? ...............................................................................................................186i) The Section 1 Analytical Framework..........................................................187ii) What are the Objectives of Paragraph 15(1)(c) of the CHRA? ..................195iii) Are the Objectives of Paragraph 15(1)(c) of the CHRAPressing and Substantial?.............................................................................197iv) The Proportionality Component of the Oakes Test ...................................205v) Rational Connection ....................................................................................208vi) Minimal Impairment....................................................................................2182011 FC 120 (CanLII)a) The Applicable Legal Principles............................................................219b) The Tribunal’s Findings with Respect to Minimal Impairment ..........226c) Air Canada and ACPA’s Arguments with Respect to MinimalImpairment ............................................................................................227d) The Expert Evidence ............................................................................ 234e) The Application of the Minimal Impairment Test ..............................281f) Conclusion on the Minimal Impairment Issue .....................................323vii) Proportionality between the Effects of the Legislationand its Objectives ........................................................................................327viii) Conclusion on the Charter Issue ................................................................350IX. Is Age a Bona Fide Occupational Requirement for Air Canada Pilots? .................352A. Legal Principles Governing Bona Fide Occupational Requirements................353B. The Tribunal’s Decision ......................................................................................359C. The Significance of the ICAO Standards............................................................377D. Timing and the Duty to Accommodate...............................................................381E. Factors to Consider in Relation to the Issue of Accommodation ......................386F. Accommodation in the Pre-November 2006 Period ..........................................405i) The Accommodation of Mr. Vilven in the Pre-November 2006 Period......408ii) The Accommodation of Mr. Kelly in the Pre-November 2006 Period .......415