View cases - Stewart McKelvey

Côté, Pierre-André. The Interpretation of Legislation in Canada, 3rd ed. Scarborough, Ont.: Carswell, 2000.Fyfe, James R. “Dignity as Theory: Competing Conceptions of Human Dignity at the Supreme Court ofCanada” (2007), 70 Sask. L. Rev. 1.Greschner, Donna. “Does Law Advance the Cause of Equality?” (2001), 27 Queen’s L.J. 299.Nouveau Petit Robert: dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française. Paris: DictionnairesLe Robert, 1993, “règle”.Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd ed. New York: Random House, 2001, “normal”.Smith, Lynn. “Development of Equality Rights: Contribution of the Right Honourable Antonio Lamer”.Paper presented at the CIAJ Annual Conference, Reasonable Accommodation and the Role of the State: ADemocratic Challenge, 25–26 September 2008, unpublished.Sullivan, Ruth. Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 5th ed. Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Canada, 2008.2009 FC 367 (CanLII)APPLICATIONS for judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s dismissal (2007CHRT 36) of age-based discrimination complaints filed by applicants Vilven and Kelly on the basisthat 60 was the normal age of retirement for the purpose of paragraph 15(1)(c) of the CanadianHuman Rights Act, and that this provision did not violate subsection 15(1) of the Charter.Applications allowed in T-1674-07 and T-1678-07; application dismissed in T-1680-07.APPEARANCESRaymond D. Hall and David Baker for applicants (respondents in T-1680-07) George Vilven andRobert Neil Kelly.Daniel Poulin and Sulini Sarugaser for respondent (applicant in T-1680-07) Canadian HumanRights Commission.Maryse Tremblay and Jennifer Black for respondent Air Canada.Bruce Laughton, Q.C. for respondent Air Canada Pilots Association.SOLICITORS OF RECORDBakerlaw, Toronto, for applicants (respondents in T-1680-07) George Vilven and Robert NeilKelly.Canadian Human Rights Commission, Ottawa, for respondent (applicant in T-1680-07) CanadianHuman Rights Commission.Heenan Blaikie LLP, Montréal, for respondent Air Canada.Laughton & Company, Vancouver, for respondent Air Canada Pilots Association.TABLE OF CONTENTSI. Introduction 1II. Background to the complaints 11Paragraph