View cases - Stewart McKelvey

23[89] The Supreme Court of Canada and other Courts have consistently told us to interprethuman rights in a large and liberal manner. In CNR v. Canada (Human Rights Commission)(Action Travail des Femmes), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114, the Court stated, at paragraph 24 :24. Human rights legislation is intended to give rise, amongst other things, toindividual rights of vital importance, rights capable of enforcement, in the finalanalysis, in a court of law. I recognize that in the construction of such legislationthe words of the Act must be given their plain meaning, but it is equally importantthat the rights enunciated be given their full recognition and effect. We should notsearch for ways and means to minimize those rights and to enfeeble their properimpact. Although it may seem commonplace, it may be wise to remind ourselvesof the statutory guidance given by the federal Interpretation Act which asserts thatstatutes are deemed to be remedial and are thus to be given such fair, large andliberal interpretation as will best ensure that their objects are attained.2010 CHRT 23 (CanLII)(ii)The Lawa) The prima facie case[90] The initial onus is on the complainant to establish a prima facie case of discrimination onthe basis of family status. A prima facie case is “one which covers the allegations made andwhich, if they are believed, is complete and sufficient to justify a verdict in the complainant’sfavour in the absence of an answer from the respondent.” (See Ontario Human RightsCommission and O’Malley v. Simpsons – Sears, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 536, at p. 558.)[91] Once a complainant establishes a prima facie case of discrimination, he or she is entitledto relief in absence of a justification by the respondent. (Ontario Human Rights Commissionv. Etobicoke, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 202, at p. 208.) In order to prove a prima facie case ofdiscrimination, the Complainant must establish that she was treated in an adverse differentialmanner and was terminated because of her family status, contrary to section 7 of the CHRA.b) What approach is to be applied to determine whether there has been discriminationon the ground of family status?[92] The evaluation of whether there is discrimination on the ground of family status is carriedout according to the test set out in Public Service Labour Relations Commission v. BCGSEU,