View cases - Stewart McKelvey

21he worked only seven (7) shifts. Ms. Storms testified that she could not speak for the reason whythe supervisor at Kenora had decided to set this employee up, but she agreed that this “person wasnot working very much.”[89] Employee C reported to Vancouver on March 15 th , 2005. He did work in Vancouver butwas also marked as “available” on many occasions. On May 16 th , 2005, he is set up in Kenora.From May 17 th to July 9 th , 2005, he worked three (3) days at that terminal and from October 20 thto December 12 th , 2005, the documents indicate that he did not work at all. Ms. Stormsconfirmed this information in her testimony.2010 CHRT 24 (CanLII)[90] Employee DE was also recalled to Vancouver on March 15 th , 2005. He had a fairlyregular pattern of work while in Vancouver. On June 18 th 2005, he is transferred and set up inTerrace, but while there he does not work until September 23 rd , date at which he is againtransferred to Vancouver.[91] Another employee IJ was called to cover the shortage at Vancouver but did not have toreport because he was then covering a shortage at another location. From March 17 th to May 16 th ,while covering that shortage, the documents indicate that he only worked one (1) day(April 26 th , 2005). From May 20 th to May 27 th , he was set up at his home terminal in ThunderBay. From June 3 rd to June 24 th , he reported to Vancouver, but again the documents show that heis not working for several days. From July 16 th to September 1 st , he has a fairly steady pattern ofwork. On September 7 th , he leaves Vancouver for Sioux Lookout, where he only worksfour (4) days up until October 27 th , 2005. After that he is set up first at Brandon and then atFort Francis.[92] Employee O did not report to Vancouver for various unexplained reasons. He is set up athis home terminal but the document show that during the period up to December his pattern ofwork at the terminal is very unsteady. Ms. Storms testified that this information “sounded