18.11.2012 Views

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EVALUATION OF CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE<br />

Graph 3: Structure of all processed questionnaires from set of questions no.2 (managing structures) according to<br />

the respondent’s country of origin (in total 34 questionnaires; the respondents from the Czech Republic represent<br />

ca. 23,5 %)<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

8<br />

Czech Republic<br />

3 3<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Austria<br />

Countries<br />

[managing structures]<br />

2 2 2<br />

THE RETURNABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRES<br />

Poland<br />

France<br />

Portugal<br />

1 1 1<br />

0 0<br />

As it has been already stated herein above, in total, there were received 254 questionnaires,<br />

while there were 1,717 e-mail addresses addressed successfully; thus, the returnability of<br />

questionnaires is 14.8 %. The questionnaire was distributed on-line in the following language<br />

versions: Czech, English, Italian, French, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, and Polish. Although the team<br />

took a decision (despite the original offer that was counting only on the Czech and English versions)<br />

to translate the questionnaire to the languages of all eleven countries where the investigations were<br />

effected (or rather ten because in case of Slovakia good knowledge of Czech was expected), the step<br />

did not positively lead to increased returnability. Availability of a particular language version thus has<br />

no direct causal connection with the returnability of questionnaires, in our case this is true especially<br />

as regards France and Italy, where the returnability is far below the average, contrary to the high<br />

returnability achieved in the case of addresses targeted with the invitation to participate written in<br />

English despite probably addressing persons of various nationalities – those were generic domains<br />

(e.g. .com, .org, etc), and especially representatives of CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> managing structures and<br />

representatives of the European Commission (under the “other country” section in the graph).<br />

Graph 4 shows that Portugal, Poland, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and<br />

undifferentiated countries are above the average returnability, while all the other countries are below<br />

the average. The dark blue column marks the number of filled in questionnaires, and the rest of the<br />

column the number of addressed addresses per respective country. The red points mark the<br />

questionnaire returnability per respective country. Hereto, we add the following methodological note:<br />

while the number of the addressed shows the numbers of e-mail addresses with the proper national<br />

domain (e.g. the number of addresses ending with .de means the number of addresses addressed in<br />

Germany); the filled-in questionnaires were differentiated by countries, not by home domains because<br />

the questionnaires were anonymous, and so the country that a respondent stated at the beginning of<br />

the questionnaire. Theoretically, it is therefore possible that a respondent from Brussels stated<br />

Germany as the country of origin, but having been addressed by the English version of the letter as<br />

Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 68<br />

Germany<br />

Spain<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Italy<br />

Slovakia<br />

11<br />

other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!