EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8.10 Contact Data EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE With regard to difficulty in obtaining the up-to-date data (the ECDB database operated by the European Commission contains in many cases out-of-date contact and other data) and to the fact that a number of data was obtained by means of MoLSA employees, we consider to be suitable and useful to mention in this Annex all the contacts, which are relevant for this evaluation and may be subsequently reused by MoLSA employees, promoters of further CIP EQUAL evaluations, as the case may be by other co-operating entities. In the first evaluation stage in particular the obtained e-mail contacts were used, namely for the purposes of distribution of the call to complete the questionnaire. Further contact data were used in particular for purposes of communication in connection with the implementation of the evaluation visits. Annex No. 8.10 consists in total of 24 tables: TAB. 1: MANAGING AUTHORITIES (MA, MA), ESF OP (2007-2013), TRANSNATIONAL CO- OPERATION (TC) ________________________________________________________ 146 TAB. 2: ELECTRONIC ADDRESSES, ON WHICH A REQUEST FOR VERIFICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE COMPLEMENTING AND UPDATING THE CONTACTS WAS SENT ________ 147 TAB. 3: ESF OP- TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION (PART 1) ______________________ 148 TAB. 4: ESF OP- TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION (PART 2) ______________________ 150 TAB. 5: NATIONAL SUPPORT STRUCTURES____________________________________ 151 TAB. 6: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS - ITALY ________________________________ 151 TAB. 7: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS -GERMANY _____________________________ 165 TAB. 8: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS –UNITED KINGDOM (GREAT BRITAIN) _______ 170 TAB. 9: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – UNITED KINGDOM (NORTHEN IRELAND) ___ 174 TAB. 10: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – POLAND_____________________________ 175 TAB. 11: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – FRANCE _____________________________ 179 TAB. 12: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – SLOVAKIA ___________________________ 188 TAB. 13: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – AUSTRIA ____________________________ 192 TAB. 14: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – SPAIN ______________________________ 194 TAB. 15: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – NETHERLAND ________________________ 204 TAB. 16: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – PORTUGAL __________________________ 208 TAB. 17: DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS – CZECH REPUBLIC _____________________ 212 TAB. 18: MEMBERS, OBSERVERS AND THEIR ALTERNATE MEMBERS IN THE CIP EQUAL MONITORING COMMITTEEE_____________________________________________________________ 217 TAB. 19: NATIONAL THEMATIC NETWORKS (A) ____________________________________ 221 TAB. 20: NATIONAL THEMATIC NETWORKS (B) ____________________________________ 222 TAB. 21: NATIONAL THEMATIC NETWORKS (C) ____________________________________ 224 TAB. 22: NATIONAL THEMATIC NETWORKS (D) ____________________________________ 225 TAB. 23: NATIONAL THEMATIC NETWORKS (E) ____________________________________ 228 TAB. 24: NATIONAL THEMATIC NETWORKS (F)_____________________________________ 229 Under each table always the source is mentioned, of which the data concerned have been obtained. The data in the tables are ordered according the persons’ surnames and names, according to the Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 144
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE identifiers of the development partnerships, as the case may be other data (relevant in the given case). The data are mentioned in the Czech language predominantly, in case of names of organisations and the like the English wording has been left, as the case may be the wording in the language of the given country. Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 145
Page 1 and 2:
Version: 6 (final) In Prague, 19th
Page 3 and 4:
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 5 and 6:
0. INTRODUCTION 0.1 Foreword EVALUA
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVALUATION OF
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
2.3.2 Supporting infrastructure EVA
Page 19 and 20:
2.4.4 What has EQUAL brought EVALUA
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
3.4.7 Case studies EVALUATION OF CI
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Short summary of partial outputs (b
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
7.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation EVA
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Obsah zadávací dokumentace 1. Zá
Page 59 and 60:
1.7. Harmonogram zakázky • Odesl
Page 61 and 62:
Konkrétními oblastmi podpory (neb
Page 63 and 64:
Mezi tyto výhody, které princip m
Page 65 and 66:
Dále se předpokládá velmi inten
Page 67 and 68:
2. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 69 and 70:
3. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 71 and 72:
4. Analýza specifických aspektů
Page 73 and 74:
5. Analýza zajímavých přístup
Page 75 and 76:
určení minimální výše adminis
Page 77 and 78:
6. 5. Zpracování návrhu zajišt
Page 79 and 80:
4. Požadované výstupy a jejich u
Page 81 and 82:
Pozn. U anglických překladů jedn
Page 83 and 84:
5.2. Členění nabídky Nabídka m
Page 85 and 86:
6. Hodnocení nabídek Základním
Page 87 and 88:
6.3. Ekonomicky nejvýhodnější n
Page 89 and 90:
onal Cooperation OP LZZ. al Coopera
Page 91 and 92:
terms of applying transnation al co
Page 93 and 94:
specific aspects of ESF projects fo
Page 95 and 96:
operation. 6.2. Identification of f
Page 97 and 98:
8.3 Questionnaire Survey EVALUATION
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 137 and 138: Results of the questionnaire survey
Page 147 and 148: 8.5 Evaluation Visits Scenario I. P
Page 151 and 152: 8.7 List of Case Studies Czech Repu
Page 153 and 154: Visit[N] Interview[R] Name of Organ
Page 155 and 156: Visi t [N] Poland Inte rvie w[R ] R
Page 157 and 158: Vi siz s[ N] Inte rvie ws[ R] Name
Page 159 and 160: Vis its[ N] Int erv iew s[R ] Name
Page 161 and 162: Vis it[ N] Italy Int erv iew [R] Na
Page 163 and 164: Section IV: Processes EVALUATION OF
Page 171 and 172: Italy: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRAN
Page 173 and 174: Austria: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TR
Page 175: 8.9.9 Contacts EVALUATION OF CIP EQ
Page 179 and 180: Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 147 EVALUATI
Page 181 and 182: Dortane, Kristine Navreme Boheme, s
Page 183 and 184: Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 151 EVALUATI
Page 185 and 186: Development partnership ID E-mail I
Page 199 and 200: Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 201 and 202: Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 203 and 204: Development partnership ID E-mail U
Page 209 and 210: Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 211 and 212: Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 213 and 214: Development partnership ID E-mail F
Page 221 and 222: Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 223 and 224: Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 225 and 226: Development partnership ID E-mail A
Page 227 and 228:
Development partnership ID E-mail E
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 239 and 240:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 241 and 242:
Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 243 and 244:
Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 245 and 246:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 247 and 248:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 249 and 250:
Organization pracujících s uprchl
Page 251 and 252:
14 Ing. Ivan Matulík Tel: 577 043
Page 253 and 254:
Pozorovatelé Evropská komise - G
Page 255 and 256:
B - Establishment of entrepreneursh
Page 257 and 258:
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 225 EVALUATI
Page 259 and 260:
MŠMT odbor koncepce vzdělávací
Page 261 and 262:
E - Equal opportunities for men and
Page 263 and 264:
8.11 Settlement of Comments EVALUAT
Page 265:
show all

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?