EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE 2.2 EU and ESF aid to the Czech Republic in the 2007–2013 period The ESF functions in the Czech Republic also in the following programming period 2007–2013, in which the financial means from the ESF were divided in three operational programmes with their own managing authorities: Human Resources and Employment Operational Programme (OP LZZ), MoLSA is its MA; Operational Programme Education for Competitiveness (OP VK), the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport is its MA; Operational Programme Prague – Adaptability (OPPA), the Capital City of Prague – Prague City Hall, EU Funds Department is its MA. 2.3 CIP EQUAL CZ in the 2004–2006 period The CIP EQUAL CZ Programme defined the terms and conditions for providing aid from the ESF for the shortened programming period 2004–2006, with the implementation till August 2008. The objective of the CIP EQUAL CZ Programme was development, testing and implementing of new means for fight against all forms of discriminations and inequalities in the labour market. The CIP EQUAL CZ target groups were: • citizens with low qualification or without qualification; • disabled persons; • national minorities; • graduates and young people; • citizens over 50 years; • women after maternity leave; • asylum seekers • and others. The CIP EQUAL CZ budget was EUR 43,973,880, i.e. ca CZK 1.4 billion (as it was already mentioned above, of 73 % the ESF funds and of 27 % the funds of the state budget of the Czech Republic were concerned). The CIP EQUAL Programme had three implementation stages both in the Czech Republic and in the partner countries – these were Actions 1, 2 and 3. The foreign partners were both from the existing and new member countries. Besides their national regulations and rules of the programmes, the common regulations of the EU for the ESF and CIP EQUAL were valid for them. 2.3.1 Legal framework Condition for participation in the CIP EQUAL CZ Programme was, accordingly with the other Member Countries, creation of national development partnerships on the basis of DPA and of the partnership for transnational cooperation on the basis of TCA. According to the conditions of participation according to Chapter 2.1 of the Instructions for Applicants, an applicant could be a legal person with a registered office in the Czech Republic representing DPA; the conditions mentioned in the Instructions for Applicants related to the partners, too. The projects had to have a non-profit character. The project implementation was divided into three actions – Action 1 with the period of duration from one to five months, Actions 2 and 3 with simultaneous course in duration of 24–36 months. The Instructions for Applicants specified eligibility of expenses and other terms and conditions for the project budget. The grant amount for the individual applicants was not specified; however, the condition was that it had to correspond to the costs of the project activities. Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 16
2.3.2 Supporting infrastructure EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE Within the framework of a CIP EQUAL CZ separate priority, technical assistance was provided to the managing authority and the development partnerships. Support to the development partnerships for the whole period of their work programme implementation belongs to the basic activities of the technical assistance. Another task of the technical assistance is monitoring of the individual DPs, namely including administration of the monitoring systems. Further the technical assistance ensured effective communication with the managing authority by means of timely providing of the information on the implementation of the individual projects and of the whole programme to the managing authority. During DP formation, creation of a project and of a budget and during preparation of a grant application the future applicants had a possibility to take part in regional seminars and a possibility to consult with the National Training Fund (NTF). They had also at their disposal the Instructions for Applicants, the Manual, list of frequently asked questions with answers and other information on the Internet sites. Later the National Support Structure (NSS) was charged with the technical assistance tasks to the managing authority including the support to the development partnerships. The company PricewaterhouseCoopers carried out the function of the National Support Structure for CIP EQUAL CZ. The technical assistance is further used to support monitoring, audits and evaluation of the activities carried out both in the Czech Republic as well as at the Europe-wide level and for preparation of studies, seminars, information events, collection, processing and dissemination of the obtained experience and results. 2.3.3 Governmental policy The framework strategic document for the area of support from the EU Structural Funds is the National Development Plan of the Czech Republic for the years 2004–2006. The main strategic documents of the Czech Republic for the area of human resources development, employment and social affairs are in particular: • National Action Plan of Social Inclusion of the Czech Republic; • National Action Plan of Employment 2004–2006; • National Innovation Strategy of the Czech Republic; • National Plan of Support and Integration of Disabled Citizens for the Period 2006–2009. The strategic documents of the Government of the Czech Republic were incorporated in the CIP EQUAL CZ Programme and in the program documents of the operational programmes. In CIP EQUAL CZ it was by means of the following priorities: • Priority 1 – Improvement of employability; • Priority 2 – Development of entrepreneurship; • Priority 3 – Support of adaptability; • Priority 4 – Equal opportunities of men and women; • Priority 5 – Assistance to the asylum seekers in access to the labour market; • Priority 6 - Technical assistance. Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 17
Page 1 and 2: Version: 6 (final) In Prague, 19th
Page 3 and 4: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 5 and 6: 0. INTRODUCTION 0.1 Foreword EVALUA
Page 9 and 10: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVALUATION OF
Page 15: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 19 and 20: 2.4.4 What has EQUAL brought EVALUA
Page 25 and 26: 3.4.7 Case studies EVALUATION OF CI
Page 43 and 44: Short summary of partial outputs (b
Page 49 and 50: 7.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation EVA
Page 57 and 58: Obsah zadávací dokumentace 1. Zá
Page 59 and 60: 1.7. Harmonogram zakázky • Odesl
Page 61 and 62: Konkrétními oblastmi podpory (neb
Page 63 and 64: Mezi tyto výhody, které princip m
Page 65 and 66: Dále se předpokládá velmi inten
Page 67 and 68:
2. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 69 and 70:
3. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 71 and 72:
4. Analýza specifických aspektů
Page 73 and 74:
5. Analýza zajímavých přístup
Page 75 and 76:
určení minimální výše adminis
Page 77 and 78:
6. 5. Zpracování návrhu zajišt
Page 79 and 80:
4. Požadované výstupy a jejich u
Page 81 and 82:
Pozn. U anglických překladů jedn
Page 83 and 84:
5.2. Členění nabídky Nabídka m
Page 85 and 86:
6. Hodnocení nabídek Základním
Page 87 and 88:
6.3. Ekonomicky nejvýhodnější n
Page 89 and 90:
onal Cooperation OP LZZ. al Coopera
Page 91 and 92:
terms of applying transnation al co
Page 93 and 94:
specific aspects of ESF projects fo
Page 95 and 96:
operation. 6.2. Identification of f
Page 97 and 98:
8.3 Questionnaire Survey EVALUATION
Page 99 and 100:
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Results of the questionnaire survey
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
8.5 Evaluation Visits Scenario I. P
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
8.7 List of Case Studies Czech Repu
Page 153 and 154:
Visit[N] Interview[R] Name of Organ
Page 155 and 156:
Visi t [N] Poland Inte rvie w[R ] R
Page 157 and 158:
Vi siz s[ N] Inte rvie ws[ R] Name
Page 159 and 160:
Vis its[ N] Int erv iew s[R ] Name
Page 161 and 162:
Vis it[ N] Italy Int erv iew [R] Na
Page 163 and 164:
Section IV: Processes EVALUATION OF
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Italy: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRAN
Page 173 and 174:
Austria: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TR
Page 175 and 176:
8.9.9 Contacts EVALUATION OF CIP EQ
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 147 EVALUATI
Page 181 and 182:
Dortane, Kristine Navreme Boheme, s
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Development partnership ID E-mail I
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 201 and 202:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 203 and 204:
Development partnership ID E-mail U
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Development partnership ID E-mail F
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 223 and 224:
Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 225 and 226:
Development partnership ID E-mail A
Page 227 and 228:
Development partnership ID E-mail E
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 239 and 240:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 247 and 248:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 249 and 250:
Organization pracujících s uprchl
Page 251 and 252:
14 Ing. Ivan Matulík Tel: 577 043
Page 253 and 254:
Pozorovatelé Evropská komise - G
Page 255 and 256:
B - Establishment of entrepreneursh
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
MŠMT odbor koncepce vzdělávací
Page 261 and 262:
E - Equal opportunities for men and
Page 263 and 264:
8.11 Settlement of Comments EVALUAT
Page 265:
show all

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?