EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme
EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme
EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EVALUATION OF CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE<br />
15. To collect suggestions from the part of technical and administrative support of the<br />
transnational cooperation supported within the ESF framework;<br />
16. To identify suitable ways of searching for partners and formation of partnerships;<br />
17. To describe management methods of partnerships;<br />
18. To identify conditions necessary for realization of the transnational cooperation of the aid<br />
recipients from the ESF from the part of technical and administrative support;<br />
19. To describe principles of evaluation of the quality of the transnational cooperation, namely<br />
including verification of tools for self-evaluation of the partnership and management of the<br />
partnership networks;<br />
20. To formulate particular practical recommendations for implementation of the transnational<br />
cooperation for the DP members;<br />
21. To formulate concrete practical recommendations for implementation of the transnational<br />
cooperation for the individual levels of the CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> implementation structure.<br />
Except for the last objective that is directed directly at the implementation structures in the Czech<br />
Republic, all the other objectives relate both to the Czech and foreign reality. Thus the<br />
evaluation focused primarily on the assessment of the impact of the transnational cooperation<br />
financed from the Czech sources, but these findings were compared with the findings from ten<br />
selected EU countries, for the majority of the phenomena being explored has (minimum) European<br />
dimension.<br />
3.2 European and transnational aspect of the evaluation<br />
We have subjected the findings based on exploration of the national sample to comparison with the<br />
other EU countries and above all, we have carried out the whole evaluation in European discourse. We<br />
have in mind by this discourse the knowledge of the starting points of the relevant policies the<br />
phenomena being explored come out from, the knowledge of the European environment, actors and<br />
decision-making and communication principles, the knowledge of the requirements for quality and<br />
evaluation methods in the European environment (comprehension of the evaluation within the EU<br />
policies context) and the knowledge of the principle of partnership and transnational cooperation from<br />
the European programmes and their practical implementation in the European projects (in which we<br />
have also participated or we have evaluated them). Therefore Czech experts with international<br />
experience, who cooperated with six foreign experts, were the core of the evaluation team.<br />
For accomplishment of the evaluation of the CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> transnational cooperation principle the<br />
following countries were selected:<br />
COUNTRY ABBREVIATION<br />
1. Czech Republic (core of the evaluation) CZ<br />
2. Italy IT<br />
3. Germany DE<br />
4. United Kingdom UK<br />
5. Poland PL<br />
6. France FR<br />
7. Slovakia SK<br />
8. Austria AT<br />
9. Spain ES<br />
10. the Netherlands NL<br />
11. Portugal PT<br />
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 21