EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

onal Cooperation
OP LZZ.
al Cooperation
OP LZZ.
Which length of the implementation of the
projects supported on the basis of the first call
in the area of transnational co-operation is
suitable and why?
Which mechanisms of support on the side of
MA and on the since of the recipient is it
necessary to establish for the call in terms of
managing individual projects based on
transnational co-operation?
ML (6)
VM (51)
JP (4)
JOŠ (51)
Topic 2: Part of the study focusing on the evaluation of Czech DP’s work
TASKS DESCRIPTIO
N /
EVALUATION
CRITERIA
Mapping
of
significan
t or
interestin
g outputs
of CIP
EQUAL
projects
on the
territory
of CZ in
terms of
applying
transnati
onal cooperation
.
Case studies of
at least 35 DP
supported in
the framework
of CIP EQUAL
CZ.
EVALUATION QUESTIONS RELATIO
NSHIP
WITH
EVALUAT
ION
OBJECTI
VES
In which projects supported by CIP EQUAL in CZ were the outputs
attained by means of transnational co-operation (the preparation and
development of which were completely based on transnational cooperation)?
In which projects supported by CIP EQUAL in CZ were these outputs
significantly influenced by the opportunity to co-operate with
transnational partners?
In what way did transnational co-operation most often influence the
outputs of the projects supported?
In what way did DP proceed in transnational co-operation in the
course of the implementation of the project – in the framework of
which activities was transnational co-operation most frequently used?
Is it possible to define the focus of activities based on transnational
co-operation the occurrence of which was key to the successful
implementation of the project?
On the contrary, is it possible to determine the focus of activities
based on transnational co-operation in which a direct benefit for the
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 57
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE
11, 13,
14, 16,
17, 20,
21, 1, 2,
6, 7,
EXPERTS EVALUAT
ION
METHOD
S USED
AP (2)
AS (2)
BB (10)
EF (2)
PJ (130)
JK (119)
ML (6)
VM (32)
LS (88)
JAŠ (176)
JP (88)
JOŠ (119)
FS, VISIT,
INT,
CASE,
ANAL,
PROC,
DOT
NB.: In view of the time
determined for establishing
this output, it is impossible
to carry out certain
necessary evaluation and
analytic methods; that is
why this output will be
finalised in the course of the
evaluation.
TARGET
GROUPS
DP, MA,
NSS,
KLIENT,
MONIT,
PP (in
order to
provide a
compariso
n with CZ
and to
achieve
higher
quality of
outputs.
Comparabl
e
references
, findings
from the
EU
OUTPUTS
REQUIRED
Practical
recommenda
tions and
tips for the
management
of
programmes
supporting
projects
focusing on
transnational
co-operation
in the new
programme
period and
in the future.
Overview of
documents
on which DP
DEADLINE
FOR
OUTPUTS
REQUIRED
May 2008