18.11.2012 Views

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.8 Template for Case Studies<br />

EVALUATION OF CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE<br />

CASE STUDY NO. --/COUNTRY<br />

„Evaluation of CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> transnational co-operation principle“<br />

Section I: Information about the organization, DP, and TCA<br />

Organization name Organization you interviewed – point of view for the CS<br />

Address<br />

Legal form, size, type<br />

Project Title and no. National project, i.e. DP<br />

Project / TC website<br />

Project Duration National project, i.e. DP duration / duration of TC if differs<br />

DP Coordinator<br />

TCA name/s and no.<br />

TC Coordinator/s Who was a secretary for given TCA/s<br />

TC Partners Number of partners: Name, country, name of the national DP<br />

Section II: TCA<br />

Objectives How were TC objectives formulated in the plan and what was the reality, what<br />

makes the difference and why. How were TC objectives connected with national DP<br />

objectives, what were the expectations of DPs and TC partners? How TC objectives<br />

influenced DP objectives and vice versa.<br />

Activities How did TC partners achieve TCA objectives, what were the activities which<br />

provided the most of the TC success? What activities where unsuccessful and why?<br />

What is recommended by TCA members to include in TC activities?<br />

Outcomes What was the real outcome from the TC?<br />

Budget Budget for entire TC, share of it by interviewed organization, budget for DP and %<br />

of it dedicated to TC - Estimate in % is enough (reality! not the original plan from<br />

the TCA, commentary why the budget increased/decreased, was the share of TC<br />

financing equal, why not, did it cause any problems etc.)<br />

Ultimate beneficiaries<br />

(target groups)<br />

Who benefited from the TC? Only TCA members? National DP partners? Politicians?<br />

DP target groups? What role had local players in negotiations? How results from<br />

TCA filtered down to the level of national activities?<br />

Crucial tests What chall<strong>eng</strong>es did the TC faced<br />

Sustainability Is there any intention to continue with started TC and activities, and why yes/not<br />

Section III: Environment<br />

Influences social problems and chall<strong>eng</strong>es which had inspired the project, motivations, role of<br />

those not directly involved in the TC or national project<br />

History origins of the initiative, contacts, where did they found partners / contacts /<br />

information, criteria for matching (selecting partners) (goals, values, countries,<br />

previous experience, type of organization… etc.), estimation of the l<strong>eng</strong>th of<br />

necessary incubation period, involvement of national partners, policy makers and<br />

other players in the establishment of the TC<br />

Criteria for setting up TC criteria for allocation of responsibilities<br />

rules<br />

<strong>EQUAL</strong> environment Managing authority support, use of National support structure, National thematic<br />

networks, <strong>EQUAL</strong> guides, etc. – requirements, quality of support, constrains,<br />

recommendations<br />

Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!