EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

More documents

Recommendations

Info

F – Intergration of foreigners to the labour market Správa uprchlických zařízení MV ČR Aleš Belka Správa uprchlických zařízení MV ČR Radim Prahl Valová Martina MPSV - Správa služeb zaměstnanosti Miloš Tichý milos.tichy@mpsv.cz MPSV - Správa služeb zaměstnanosti Martina Kalinová Petra Boušková (náhradnice M. martina.kalinova@mpsv.cz MPSV - Správa služeb zaměstnanosti Tichého) petra.bouskova@mpsv.cz MPSV - odbor migrace a integrace cizinců Jan Kepka jan.kepka@mpsv.cz Rada vlády pro národnostní menšiny Alexej Kelin A.Kelin@seznam.cz Úřad práce Praha Předseda: Václav Götz Xenie Johnová Xenie.Johnova@aa.mpsv.cz Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 230 EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE 118 221 923 558 221 923 349 221 923 507 221 923 735 603 574 168
8.11 Settlement of Comments EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE The specification of settlement is mentioned in blue in italics in the text below the concrete comment. Comments of MA on the Final Report on the Evaluation of the Transnational Cooperation Principle. 1) The part of solution of task 5 is not mentioned, to complement The specific part of the study answered the question of relevant HRD areas, on which it would be desirable to focus the projects implemented in the form of transnational cooperation in the following programming period. In the time of processing this part of the evaluation, only a call from France for projects in transnational cooperation, strategic documents of HRD from ten EU countries included in this evaluation (see the list of sources in annex hereto) and evaluation reports concerning this topic from Poland and Austria were available. While some countries have the orientation of the transnational cooperation in HDR defined according to the appropriate strategic documents thematically, other countries prefer regional orientation (less frequent case). For this reason, the expert team combined both approaches and to do so it used the SWOT method, thus it divided the analysis according to individual countries and specified further the topics, for which cooperation with the given country is recommended. A brief summary of these findings is mentioned in the text of Chapter 6.5. The evaluation team has conducted several discussions to this topic with the contracting authority, generally speaking, the evaluator is afraid to mention any classification of the countries according to the topics for the reason that this classification might not become a basis for prejudices and too simplifying views. Both parties are aware that the specifics of the countries are a considerably more complex problem, and thus they perceive the statements to the individual HRD topics as purely purposeful for fulfilment of the evaluation task, i.e. to single out interesting HRD topics that would be suitable to be supported within the framework of the transnational cooperation. 2) It is not obvious where the information to task 4 is (added value, specific aspects, eligible expenses) Analysis of the specific aspects and of the added value of the ESF projects based on support to the transnational cooperation was elaborated in details in the First Interim Report and the account of its outputs is taken in this Final Report in particular in concrete recommendations concerning implementation of the projects with transnational aspect. Summarisation of the results of this part of the evaluation was added to Chapter 6.5. 3) It is necessary to add in the introduction a description of the structure of the report (e.g. a reference to Chapter 6 and what it contains is missing) Added. 4) To complement observations in Chapter 4.1. It is mentioned imprecisely that the organisations do not always have a possibility to update the data (for this concerns only MSSF) and that it is not clear who and what updates – this is clear (web of Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 231
Page 1 and 2:
Version: 6 (final) In Prague, 19th
Page 3 and 4:
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 5 and 6:
0. INTRODUCTION 0.1 Foreword EVALUA
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVALUATION OF
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
2.3.2 Supporting infrastructure EVA
Page 19 and 20:
2.4.4 What has EQUAL brought EVALUA
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
3.4.7 Case studies EVALUATION OF CI
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Short summary of partial outputs (b
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
7.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation EVA
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Obsah zadávací dokumentace 1. Zá
Page 59 and 60:
1.7. Harmonogram zakázky • Odesl
Page 61 and 62:
Konkrétními oblastmi podpory (neb
Page 63 and 64:
Mezi tyto výhody, které princip m
Page 65 and 66:
Dále se předpokládá velmi inten
Page 67 and 68:
2. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 69 and 70:
3. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 71 and 72:
4. Analýza specifických aspektů
Page 73 and 74:
5. Analýza zajímavých přístup
Page 75 and 76:
určení minimální výše adminis
Page 77 and 78:
6. 5. Zpracování návrhu zajišt
Page 79 and 80:
4. Požadované výstupy a jejich u
Page 81 and 82:
Pozn. U anglických překladů jedn
Page 83 and 84:
5.2. Členění nabídky Nabídka m
Page 85 and 86:
6. Hodnocení nabídek Základním
Page 87 and 88:
6.3. Ekonomicky nejvýhodnější n
Page 89 and 90:
onal Cooperation OP LZZ. al Coopera
Page 91 and 92:
terms of applying transnation al co
Page 93 and 94:
specific aspects of ESF projects fo
Page 95 and 96:
operation. 6.2. Identification of f
Page 97 and 98:
8.3 Questionnaire Survey EVALUATION
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Results of the questionnaire survey
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
8.5 Evaluation Visits Scenario I. P
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
8.7 List of Case Studies Czech Repu
Page 153 and 154:
Visit[N] Interview[R] Name of Organ
Page 155 and 156:
Visi t [N] Poland Inte rvie w[R ] R
Page 157 and 158:
Vi siz s[ N] Inte rvie ws[ R] Name
Page 159 and 160:
Vis its[ N] Int erv iew s[R ] Name
Page 161 and 162:
Vis it[ N] Italy Int erv iew [R] Na
Page 163 and 164:
Section IV: Processes EVALUATION OF
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Italy: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRAN
Page 173 and 174:
Austria: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TR
Page 175 and 176:
8.9.9 Contacts EVALUATION OF CIP EQ
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 147 EVALUATI
Page 181 and 182:
Dortane, Kristine Navreme Boheme, s
Page 183 and 184:
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 151 EVALUATI
Page 185 and 186:
Development partnership ID E-mail I
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 201 and 202:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 203 and 204:
Development partnership ID E-mail U
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 211 and 212: Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 213 and 214: Development partnership ID E-mail F
Page 221 and 222: Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 223 and 224: Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 225 and 226: Development partnership ID E-mail A
Page 227 and 228: Development partnership ID E-mail E
Page 237 and 238: Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 239 and 240: Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 245 and 246: Organization Development partnershi
Page 247 and 248: Organization Development partnershi
Page 249 and 250: Organization pracujících s uprchl
Page 251 and 252: 14 Ing. Ivan Matulík Tel: 577 043
Page 253 and 254: Pozorovatelé Evropská komise - G
Page 255 and 256: B - Establishment of entrepreneursh
Page 257 and 258: Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 225 EVALUATI
Page 259 and 260: MŠMT odbor koncepce vzdělávací
Page 261: E - Equal opportunities for men and
Page 265: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
show all

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?