EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

operation.
6.2. Identification
of factors leading
to failure in
projects focusing
on transnational
co-operation.
6.3. Drafting a
proposal including
various
possibilities of the
management and
implementation of
the priority axis
transnational cooperation
OP LZZ,
on the basis of our
experience as well
as experience
acquired abroad.
6.4. Drafting a
proposal on
ensuring the
monitoring and
evaluation of
transnational cooperation
supported not only
in the framework
of the priority
transnational cooperation
OP LZZ,
but also as part of
the other priorities
OP LZZ and other
managing and
implementing
priority axes
transnational
co-operation
OP LZZ. (task
3)
6.4. Drafting a
proposal on
ensuring the
monitoring and
evaluation of
ESF projects
focusing on the
support of
transnational
co-operation.
(task 4)
6.5. Drafting a
proposal on
ensuring the
monitoring and
evaluation of
ERDF projects
focusing on the
support of
transnational
co-operation.
(task 5)
6.6. Drafting a
proposal on to
how to handle
the outputs
and results of
ESF projects
focusing on the
management and implementation of the project?
Is it possible to prove the negative influence of insufficiently high
administrative or other expenditures of the project on the course
of the project’s implementation and the results of the project
implemented?
Is it possible to prove the negative influence of an insufficiently
long period of time established for the preparation of projects with
this focus on their course and results?
In what way would it be possible to prevent or at least minimise
the ascertained negative factors on behalf of MA?
6.3. Which alternative proposals for managing and implementing
the priority axis transnational co-operation would be suitable on
the basis of the experience ascertained?
On the contrary, which proposals for managing and implementing
this priority axis would not be suitable on the basis of the
experience ascertained?
In what way would it be and would it not be suitable to support
the individual projects (in the form of grant schemes, national or
systemic projects)?
In what way would it be appropriate and inappropriate to
announce call for submitting projects (with regard to the fact that
in term of time, it is demanding to process them, which involves
the minimal length of the period for processing applications for
financial resources from this priority)?
Is there a certain type of information which would make it easier
for applicants to process the application for financial resources
from this priority and which they did not have at their disposal for
example in the course of the implementation of CIP EQUAL?
What type of specific support is it necessary to the entity
implementing the project with during the implementation of the
project?
6.4. Which alternative proposals for ensuring the monitoring and
evaluation of transnational co-operation supported from ESF would
it be suitable to apply in CZ in the 2007-2013 programme period?
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 63
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE
VM (20)
LS (30)
JAŠ (37)
JP (20)
JOŠ (37)
(Applies to
all tasks)
NSS
,
NSS
EU,
ŽA
D,
POL
IT,
EK
(Ap
plie
s to
all
tas
ks)
and in the future.
(tasks 1, 2 and 5)
Practical
recommendations and
tips for the
management of
programmes
supporting projects
focusing on
transnational cooperation
in the new
programme period
and in the future –
involving especially
alternative proposals
of the management
and implementation
of the priority or of its
parts focusing on
transnational cooperation
in the area
of HRD. (task 3)
Practical
recommendations and
tips for the
management of
programmes
supporting projects
focusing on
transnational cooperation
in the new
programme period
and in the future,
including
recommendations and
tips applicable to
Evaluation Plan
2007+ a plan of