18.11.2012 Views

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EVALUATION OF CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE<br />

several member states. This activity must build on a transnational, inter-governmental agreement and<br />

specification of an assignment for monitoring or evaluation from the position of the given group of<br />

countries. At the same time, the reasoning is possible rather at the level of comparisons (of similarities<br />

or on the contrary, of differences), in it how the individual accents in the priorities of the thematic<br />

(intervention) areas in the given countries, in the wider context of the European Employment<br />

Strategy, are stipulated. With regard to the fact that such setting will most probably exceed the<br />

competencies of the ministries, inter-governmental agreements would have to be concerned. At the<br />

same time these agreements would have to stipulate the responsibilities for system administration and<br />

sharing the costs connected with its development and operation.<br />

Individual countries create also monitoring and evaluation plans, e.g. “Northern Ireland European<br />

Social Fund Programme 2007 – 2013” mentions in Chapter 4 Evaluation in paragraph 4.24 the<br />

evaluation strategy in the first half of the programme: having carried out the substantial part of the<br />

project activities to evaluate the contribution (added value) of the programme to the strategic<br />

intentions of the EU, the Member State and the region and, in particular the innovative, supranational<br />

and interregional activities and horizontal themes. The evaluation strategy of the North Irish ESF<br />

programme will be updated for the second half of the programme’s duration in order to take account<br />

of the regional socio-economical and political development. In the United Kingdom, the West Wales<br />

and the Valleys Convergence Programme - Operational Programme for the ESF mentions in Chapter 3<br />

– Strategy, paragraph 3.131 that the managing authority shall establish an independent Transnational<br />

Cooperation Unit to support the programme activities. Then in Chapter 6 in paragraphs 6.40 – 6.42<br />

the planning tool of the managing authority “Strategic Frameworks” is described as an implementation<br />

strategy to achieve the strategic objective by means of strategically interconnected project<br />

interventions. These frameworks will serve in selection of the projects, they will enable their<br />

comparison. Thus the managing authority will be able to identify projects proposing transnational or<br />

interregional cooperation already in the stage of submission and selection and to direct them towards<br />

achieving of the programme objectives. It will be able to provide them specific assistance also during<br />

the implementation and monitor and evaluate them purposefully in cooperation with the Monitoring<br />

Committee. The East Wales Regional Competitiveness & Employment Programme for the ESF 2007–<br />

2013 is drawn up accordingly. Both these programmes will thus be implemented, monitored and<br />

evaluated with the managing authority’s active participation, without prejudice to the Monitoring<br />

Committee’s power and responsibility.<br />

5.6 Management of the CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> and other HRD<br />

programmes funded from the ESF<br />

Management and implementation of the transnational cooperation priority axis does not arise in<br />

vacuum, it follows up with the previous experience in management of similar programmes and it does<br />

not definitely assume that it will leave the begun tradition completely. On the contrary, this is<br />

obviously the solution to the basic question, the general problem connected with management of any<br />

programmes: namely to what extent to set the rules and restrictions in such a way that the exerted<br />

endeavour would really reflect in the improved quality of the implemented projects. It appears that<br />

obviously the surest answer is the link-up with the traditions, the implementing entities’ expectations<br />

and the previous experience, from which this results as a rule. The priority axis management must<br />

work necessarily with the context of the Czech environment, thus with the relatively low experience of<br />

the project implementing entities in transnational partnerships and (sometimes) with the partnership<br />

at all, smaller stability of institutions and weak links between the transnational and national level of<br />

the partnership. In the countries that were included in the evaluation, various measures were<br />

recommended and somewhere also implemented. For example, creation of a special measure or a<br />

project at the programme management level (not at the project level) was concerned, which will<br />

facilitate the process of search for the partners and formation of the transnational partnership; in<br />

some countries this type of measures is implemented in the form recommendation of minimum extent<br />

of the partnership, which countries to focus on when searching for partners (further to the national<br />

strategies), which activities shall be str<strong>eng</strong>thened (it is generally recommended to limit generic<br />

activities that miss the concrete content); somewhere this principle was transposed into formation of a<br />

concrete physical institution, the mission of which is to support transnational partnership in the<br />

projects in the given programme. A recommendation to announce gradually successive calls, some of<br />

Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!