EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

terms of
applying
transnation
al cooperation
(those DP
have been
selected
which cooperated
on
the basis of
TCA with
Czech DP).
international
DP (2 in
each
selected EU
country plus
special
studies
above 20 as
the case
may be).
In what way did transnational co-operation most often influence the outputs
of the projects supported?
In what way did DP proceed in transnational co-operation in the course of the
implementation of the project – in the framework of which activities was
transnational co-operation used most often?
Among the types of activities and expenditures implemented in the cases
examined in the framework of transnational co-operation, were significant
differences ascertained stemming from the extent of activities and
expenditures which were considered qualified in the individual Member States?
Did the ascertained differences in the extent of expenditure qualification lead
to an easier or, on the contrary, a more difficult implementation of the
individual projects?
Is it possible to define the focus of activities based on transnational cooperation
the occurrence of which was key to the successful implementation
of the project?
On the contrary, is it possible to determine the focus of activities based on
transnational co-operation in which a direct benefit for the project and the
outputs have not been proven?
In the course of establishing the project outputs based on transnational cooperation,
was it necessary to ensure for DP a special type of support from
MA or NSS?
Were some types of support ascertained which DP would welcome from MA or
NSS in the implementation of DP’s projects in the area of transnational cooperation?
In what stage of the preparation or the implementation of its projects would
DP welcome this support most frequently?
What documents did DP base their activities on during the preparation and
implementation of its projects on in the area of transnational co-operation?
Which previous experience did the partners involved in the individual DP use
most frequently in the preparation and implementation of their activities
focusing on transnational co-operation?
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 59
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE
ML (152)
VM (10)
LS (10)
JAŠ (10)
JP (10)
JOŠ (17)
parallel to
topic 3, a
compariso
n with CZ
will be
used
particularl
y with
regard to
the fact
that the
outputs
are
supposed
to serve
primarily
for Czech
institutions
, for
details see
the
timetable)
supporting
projects
focusing
on
transnatio
nal cooperation
in the new
programm
e period
and in the
future.