EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE
Graph 1: Structure of all processed questionnaires according to the respondent’s type with respect to CIP EQUAL
(in total 246 questionnaires)
Structure of all processed questionnaires according to the respondent’s type
with respect to CIP EQUAL
Member of the payment
authority / payment unit; 0
Representative of the
European Commission; 0
ESF or HRD policy maker;
1
Politician / Decision
Maker; 2
Member of the Monitoring
Committee; 5
Representative of the
National Supporting
Structure; 8
Representative of the
Development Partnership;
179
Representative of the
Managing Authority; 18
Member of the National
Thematic Network; 14
Ultimate beneficiary of
services provided/initiated
by CIP EQUAL projects; 8
Independent expert; 6
Applicant or a person
interested in getting
involved in EQUAL project;
5
Graph 2: Structure of all processed questionnaires from set of questions no.1 (projects) according to the
respondent’s country of origin (in total 212 questionnaires; the respondents from the Czech Republic represent
ca. 21 %)
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
45
Czech Republic
31
Portugal
29
Poland
22
The Netherlands
19
Spain
Countries
[projects]
16
United Kingdom
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 67
15
Germany
14
Slovakia
11
Italy
5
France
2
Austria
3
other