EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE
4. Observations according to the given evaluation tools .................................................26
4.1 Analysis of documents......................................................................................26
4.2 Questionnaire survey .......................................................................................27
4.3 Evaluation visits, interviews and case studies.....................................................29
4.4 Focus groups and evaluation of processes .........................................................29
5. Findings according to the selected topics...................................................................31
5.1 Preparation of the transnational cooperation......................................................31
5.2 Transnational cooperation administration and management................................32
5.3 Transnational cooperation implementation: activities, outputs ............................34
5.4 Sustainability, mainstreaming and wider partnership networks............................37
5.5 Monitoring and evaluation ................................................................................40
5.6 Management of the CIP EQUAL and other HRD programmes funded from the ESF
41
6. Description of the course of evaluation according to individual evaluation outputs .......42
6.1 Topic 1: Part of the study focused on the support in the preparation the first call of
Priority axis Transnational Cooperation OP LZZ .............................................................42
6.2 Topic 2: Part of the study focused on the assessment of Czech DP’s work...........44
6.3 Topic 3: Part of the study focused on the assessment of the work of DP supported
in other EU Member States ..........................................................................................44
6.4 Topic 4: Analysis of the specific aspects and the added value of the ESF projects
based on the support of transnational cooperation ........................................................44
6.5 Topic 5: Analysis of interesting approaches and specific areas of HRD in other EU
countries ....................................................................................................................44
6.6 Topic 6: Part of the study focused on the synthesis of the findings from previous
parts of the study (part 1) ...........................................................................................46
6.7 Topic 6: Part of the study focused on the synthesis of the findings from previous
parts of the study (part 2) ...........................................................................................47
7. Recommendations for the individual stakeholders ......................................................48
7.1 Recommendations for the entities submitting and implementing projects ............48
7.1.1 Transnational cooperation preparation...........................................................48
7.1.2 Transnational cooperation administration and management ............................48
7.1.3 Activities, added value ..................................................................................48
7.1.4 Sustainability, mainstreaming and wider partnership networks ........................48
7.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation.............................................................................49
7.2 Recommendations for MA and NSS ...................................................................49
7.2.1 Role within the framework of the programme and relations to other actors......49
7.2.2 Formulation of expected outputs and results of the transnational cooperation..49
7.2.3 Preparation of the partnership agreements ....................................................50
7.2.4 Transnational cooperation administration and management ............................50
7.2.5 Sustainability, mainstreaming and wider partnership networks ........................50
7.2.6 Monitoring and evaluation.............................................................................51
7.2.7 Conclusion to the recommendations for the managing authority......................52
7.3 Recommendations for the mainstreaming partners.............................................52
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 3