EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE Irma van der Veen Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen (Ministry of Justice , Agency “Prisons” , sector “Youth”) NL N Klaas Kuin ROC ID College NL N Lambert van Leeuwen Stichting Edukint NL R Louis Geelhoed Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment NL R Margo Kerkhof Teamleader EQUAL of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment NL R Maurice Nuijten Centrum voor Dienstverlening NL N (CvD) Paul de Haas GOA Noord NL R Peter Princen NV REWIN West Brabant NL N Silvio Milia Gewest Eemland NL R Trudy Hoeymakers Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen NL R Willy van Diepen Gemeente (municipality) Hengelo NL R Aleksandra Kacperska Ośrodek Praw Człowieka PL N Andrzej Martynuska Director of Regional Labour Office in Krakow PL N Aneta Bagińska Żorska Izba Gospodarcza, Żory PL R Anna Zebrak Fundacja Instytut Rozwoju PL R Regionalnego Bartłomiej Kindler Dom Maklerski Penetrator PL N Danuta Pławecka Instytut Spraw Publicznych PL R Dariusz Motyl manager Grupa Antares, Warszawa PL R Elżbieta Hibner Board Member, the governor of Lodz Region PL N Ewa Leś Uniwersytet Warszawski, Instytut Polityki Społecznej PL R Jan Szomburg Jr. Regional Policy Advisor, IBnGR, Gdansk PL N Joanna Zwolińska Instytut MiSTiA PL N Kinga Pawłowska WSB PL R Magdalena Zawodna Regionalny Osrodek Polityki PL R Społecznej Magdalenia Kocik Uniwersytet Warszawski, Instytut Polityki Społecznej PL R Mieczysław Bąk Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza PL R Mirosław Czyżewski WDpF Nowolipki PL R Olga Gałek Fundacja Partnerstwo dla Środowiska PL N Sławomir Wysocki Evaluation Expert, Qbase PL N Sylwia Tałach Stowarzyszenie Doradców PL R Europejskich Waldemar Rataj Former head of the Prime Minister Council, policy advisor Anna Verešová Áno pre život – nezisková organizácia poskytujúca všeobecne prospešné služby PL N SK N Ing Miroslava Bukovanová Proma.s.r.o. SK N Jana Cviková Aspekt SK R Kristina Jakubcová Dafne SK N Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 114
8.5 Evaluation Visits Scenario I. PREPARATION FOR THE EVALUATION VISIT/INTERVIEW EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE 1. The first contact with the organization (e-mail, phone call), set up the date and time of the meeting/interview, attach supporting letter from MoLSA, ask for materials (see below) 2. Evaluator has to analyze documents BEFORE the visit/interview – basic info in ECDB and national CIP EQUAL databases, project website, materials sent by project coordinator, monitoring reports, etc. (see the list of sources prepared by Linda!!!) 3. Introduce yourself, who you are, why you are there, what is the intention of the visit/interview, make the person/s feel comfortable, make sure they understand you are not going to evaluate their work/institution but TC only 4. Ask for permission to record your interview, in case the person disagrees, always respect it, possible model is also to stop recording whenever the person asks for it, do not record in a case you do not need it, recording usually makes people more aware of what they are saying ;-) 5. write INTERNAL report (only for our team purposes), in which you specify when did you make the interview, with whom, short summary of the interview, summarize your findings, observations and recommendations for us as a team (such as “next time ask for XY, lets focus on …, we need to make sure that we cover XY” etc. – we are going to SHARE our reports) 6. Keep in mind objectives of the evaluation of TC principle 7. Keep in mind each of selected project will become the case study, so we need to write down case studies in the proposed structure (by Aleksander) 8. Let us know any comments, concerns, suggestions! FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF QUESTIONING ACCORDING TO GOALS: 1) Management authority, practice, specific experiences Basic question outline: • How they communicated • What issues they dealt with • What issues and specific things were not resolved to satisfy project implementing partners 2) Development Partnership Content Procedure: • Beginning with the formulation of expectations from the DP as stated in the national DPA (this agreement should contain description, what added value should the DP bring or generate); • Please, ask some questions concerning the understanding of terminology, jargon. It seems that it makes some troubles, for instance different understanding of migration, empowerment etc. were identified in other evaluations as problematic. Did it cause any troubles to them specifically in TC? Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 115
Page 1 and 2:
Version: 6 (final) In Prague, 19th
Page 3 and 4:
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 5 and 6:
0. INTRODUCTION 0.1 Foreword EVALUA
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVALUATION OF
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
2.3.2 Supporting infrastructure EVA
Page 19 and 20:
2.4.4 What has EQUAL brought EVALUA
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
3.4.7 Case studies EVALUATION OF CI
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Short summary of partial outputs (b
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
7.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation EVA
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Obsah zadávací dokumentace 1. Zá
Page 59 and 60:
1.7. Harmonogram zakázky • Odesl
Page 61 and 62:
Konkrétními oblastmi podpory (neb
Page 63 and 64:
Mezi tyto výhody, které princip m
Page 65 and 66:
Dále se předpokládá velmi inten
Page 67 and 68:
2. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 69 and 70:
3. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 71 and 72:
4. Analýza specifických aspektů
Page 73 and 74:
5. Analýza zajímavých přístup
Page 75 and 76:
určení minimální výše adminis
Page 77 and 78:
6. 5. Zpracování návrhu zajišt
Page 79 and 80:
4. Požadované výstupy a jejich u
Page 81 and 82:
Pozn. U anglických překladů jedn
Page 83 and 84:
5.2. Členění nabídky Nabídka m
Page 85 and 86:
6. Hodnocení nabídek Základním
Page 87 and 88:
6.3. Ekonomicky nejvýhodnější n
Page 89 and 90:
onal Cooperation OP LZZ. al Coopera
Page 91 and 92:
terms of applying transnation al co
Page 93 and 94:
specific aspects of ESF projects fo
Page 95 and 96: operation. 6.2. Identification of f
Page 97 and 98: 8.3 Questionnaire Survey EVALUATION
Page 99 and 100: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 137 and 138: Results of the questionnaire survey
Page 145: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 151 and 152: 8.7 List of Case Studies Czech Repu
Page 153 and 154: Visit[N] Interview[R] Name of Organ
Page 155 and 156: Visi t [N] Poland Inte rvie w[R ] R
Page 157 and 158: Vi siz s[ N] Inte rvie ws[ R] Name
Page 159 and 160: Vis its[ N] Int erv iew s[R ] Name
Page 161 and 162: Vis it[ N] Italy Int erv iew [R] Na
Page 163 and 164: Section IV: Processes EVALUATION OF
Page 171 and 172: Italy: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRAN
Page 173 and 174: Austria: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TR
Page 175 and 176: 8.9.9 Contacts EVALUATION OF CIP EQ
Page 179 and 180: Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 147 EVALUATI
Page 181 and 182: Dortane, Kristine Navreme Boheme, s
Page 183 and 184: Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 151 EVALUATI
Page 185 and 186: Development partnership ID E-mail I
Page 197 and 198:
Development partnership ID E-mail I
Page 199 and 200:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 201 and 202:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 203 and 204:
Development partnership ID E-mail U
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Development partnership ID E-mail F
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 223 and 224:
Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 225 and 226:
Development partnership ID E-mail A
Page 227 and 228:
Development partnership ID E-mail E
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 239 and 240:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 247 and 248:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 249 and 250:
Organization pracujících s uprchl
Page 251 and 252:
14 Ing. Ivan Matulík Tel: 577 043
Page 253 and 254:
Pozorovatelé Evropská komise - G
Page 255 and 256:
B - Establishment of entrepreneursh
Page 257 and 258:
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 225 EVALUATI
Page 259 and 260:
MŠMT odbor koncepce vzdělávací
Page 261 and 262:
E - Equal opportunities for men and
Page 263 and 264:
8.11 Settlement of Comments EVALUAT
Page 265:
show all

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?