EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE Graph 15: Answer to the question: “In case that a project with transnational partnership implies a longer duration in comparison with projects that do not possess a transnational dimension, what are the phases of the transnational project requiring the allocation of more time?“ (more options could be selected at the same time; the data for all respondents and also for the respondents only from the Czech Republic are mentioned) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 135 31 preparatory work In case that a project with transnational partnership implies a longer duration in comparison with projects that do not possess a transnational dimension, what are the phases of the transnational project requiring the allocation of more time? [projects] 92 overall coordination 68 17 15 63 implementation definition of rules and procedures Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 80 51 10 8 monitoring and evaluation Total Czech Republic 43 5 drawing of conclusions As a result of our question concerning the efficiency of the funds spent on transnational cooperation (question: “How much the additional resources needed by the transnational dimension of your project (in terms of money, time and energy) were paid off in terms of a higher quality of your project?”) we got the average figure of 3.9 (the average of all respondents) or 4.2 for the respondents from the Czech Republic on the scale from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much so). 10 1 other
EVALUATION OF CIP <strong>EQUAL</strong> TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PRINCIPLE Graph 16: Answer to the question: “Based on your experience, is there a need for further support to implementing teams of transnational partnerships?“ (only one option could be selected; the data for all respondents and also for the respondents only from the Czech Republic are mentioned) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Based on your experience, is there a need for further support to implementing teams of transnational partnerships? [projects] 152 34 Total Czech Republic Yes No Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 81 58 9
Page 1 and 2:
Version: 6 (final) In Prague, 19th
Page 3 and 4:
EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 5 and 6:
0. INTRODUCTION 0.1 Foreword EVALUA
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EVALUATION OF
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
2.3.2 Supporting infrastructure EVA
Page 19 and 20:
2.4.4 What has EQUAL brought EVALUA
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
3.4.7 Case studies EVALUATION OF CI
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Short summary of partial outputs (b
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
7.1.5 Monitoring and evaluation EVA
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Obsah zadávací dokumentace 1. Zá
Page 59 and 60:
1.7. Harmonogram zakázky • Odesl
Page 61 and 62: Konkrétními oblastmi podpory (neb
Page 63 and 64: Mezi tyto výhody, které princip m
Page 65 and 66: Dále se předpokládá velmi inten
Page 67 and 68: 2. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 69 and 70: 3. Část studie zaměřená na hod
Page 71 and 72: 4. Analýza specifických aspektů
Page 73 and 74: 5. Analýza zajímavých přístup
Page 75 and 76: určení minimální výše adminis
Page 77 and 78: 6. 5. Zpracování návrhu zajišt
Page 79 and 80: 4. Požadované výstupy a jejich u
Page 81 and 82: Pozn. U anglických překladů jedn
Page 83 and 84: 5.2. Členění nabídky Nabídka m
Page 85 and 86: 6. Hodnocení nabídek Základním
Page 87 and 88: 6.3. Ekonomicky nejvýhodnější n
Page 89 and 90: onal Cooperation OP LZZ. al Coopera
Page 91 and 92: terms of applying transnation al co
Page 93 and 94: specific aspects of ESF projects fo
Page 95 and 96: operation. 6.2. Identification of f
Page 97 and 98: 8.3 Questionnaire Survey EVALUATION
Page 99 and 100: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 111: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRANSNATION
Page 137 and 138: Results of the questionnaire survey
Page 147 and 148: 8.5 Evaluation Visits Scenario I. P
Page 151 and 152: 8.7 List of Case Studies Czech Repu
Page 153 and 154: Visit[N] Interview[R] Name of Organ
Page 155 and 156: Visi t [N] Poland Inte rvie w[R ] R
Page 157 and 158: Vi siz s[ N] Inte rvie ws[ R] Name
Page 159 and 160: Vis its[ N] Int erv iew s[R ] Name
Page 161 and 162: Vis it[ N] Italy Int erv iew [R] Na
Page 163 and 164:
Section IV: Processes EVALUATION OF
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Italy: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TRAN
Page 173 and 174:
Austria: EVALUATION OF CIP EQUAL TR
Page 175 and 176:
8.9.9 Contacts EVALUATION OF CIP EQ
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Navreme Boheme, s.r.o. 147 EVALUATI
Page 181 and 182:
Dortane, Kristine Navreme Boheme, s
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Development partnership ID E-mail I
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 201 and 202:
Development partnership ID E-mail D
Page 203 and 204:
Development partnership ID E-mail U
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Development partnership ID E-mail P
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Development partnership ID E-mail F
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 223 and 224:
Development partnership ID E-mail S
Page 225 and 226:
Development partnership ID E-mail A
Page 227 and 228:
Development partnership ID E-mail E
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 239 and 240:
Development partnership ID E-mail N
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 247 and 248:
Organization Development partnershi
Page 249 and 250:
Organization pracujících s uprchl
Page 251 and 252:
14 Ing. Ivan Matulík Tel: 577 043
Page 253 and 254:
Pozorovatelé Evropská komise - G
Page 255 and 256:
B - Establishment of entrepreneursh
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
MŠMT odbor koncepce vzdělávací
Page 261 and 262:
E - Equal opportunities for men and
Page 263 and 264:
8.11 Settlement of Comments EVALUAT
Page 265:
show all

EQUAL - Final report - eng - navreme

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?