10.07.2015 Views

MART Vol. II MO/MP - NESA - Civil Air Patrol

MART Vol. II MO/MP - NESA - Civil Air Patrol

MART Vol. II MO/MP - NESA - Civil Air Patrol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Per CAPR 60-1, sustained flight below an altitude or lateral distance from anyobject of 1,000 ft during the day or 2,000 ft at night is prohibited except for takeoffand landing or in compliance with ATC procedures (such as IFR flight). At no timewill the pilot allow the aircraft to come within 500 feet of terrain or obstructionsunless taking off or landing. So, pilots may descend below the designated searchaltitude to verify potential crash sites or the presence of survivors, and to preventloss of life, property, or human suffering, but never below 500' AGL; once thetarget has been identified the pilot will return to 1000' AGL or higher. [Refer toCAPR 60-1 for special restrictions for over-water missions.]The size of the search objective, weather, visibility, and ground cover in thesearch area must be considered when determining the altitude and airspeed for avisual search. Over non-mountainous terrain, a search altitude between 1000 and2000 feet above the terrain is normally used for a visual search. The searchvisibility and the terrain conditions may affect this selection. As altitude decreasesbelow 1000 feet search effectiveness may actually decrease, due to the "rusheffect" of objects on the ground passing through the scanner's field of view morerapidly.Over mountainous terrain, the search altitude may be higher if the plannersuspects wind and turbulence near the surface. During darkness, an altitude3,000 feet above the terrain is considered adequate. Also, rugged terrain caneasily block emergency radio transmissions, so electronic searches over suchterrain are normally conducted at considerably higher altitudes than would beused during visual searches.Depending upon the number of search aircraft available to the incidentcommander, he may also consider the desired probability of detection whenselecting an altitude for the search pattern. Although a probability of detectionchart is normally used to estimate POD after a search, its use here allows incidentcommanders to predetermine a mission's chance of success. Here’s an exampleof using desired POD to help select a search altitude.A red and white Cessna 172 has been reported missing and presumed downin eastern Arkansas, in open flat terrain. At the time of the search, flight visibilityis forecast to be greater than 10 miles. The incident commander determines,based on available aircraft and crews, that the single probability of detection forthis first search must be at least 50%.The POD chart excerpt in Table 6-1 shows data for: open, flat terrain; hillyterrain and/or moderate ground cover; and very hilly and/or heavily coveredterrain. To the right in the columns beneath "Search Visibility" you see what are,in this case, the desired probabilities of detection. Looking at the open/flat terrainportion of the table (Table 6-2) and using 1-mile track spacing with 4 nm searchvisibility, you can see that all three altitudes give at least 50% POD. A search at1000 feet above the terrain gives 60%, or 12% more POD, than does a search at500 feet. Over open terrain, where flight and search visibility are not limitingfactors (i.e., greater than 4 nm), the chart demonstrates that a higher altitude ismore likely to yield positive results on a single sortie. Notice that the highest PODin Table 9-2, 85%, is obtained when flying at 1,000 feet above the ground using atrack spacing of 0.5 nm. [Note: In Table 6-1 and on the reverse of the CAP 104,85% has been transposed to 58%, which is incorrect.]105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!