19.11.2012 Views

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Botswana and the Caprivi Zipfel to a point on the said boundary due north of the beacon situated at Ngoma:<br />

...thence in a westerly and north westerly direction following the southern edge of the said road from Lesuma to<br />

Kasane to its point of intersection with the boundary of the freehold property known as the Chobe River Hotel;<br />

thence in a southwesterly direction following the said Chobe River Hotel boundary to beacon KH 3 being a<br />

beacon on the said boundary; thence in a straight line south-westwards to beacon KH 8 being a beacon situated<br />

on the boundary of the leasehold property adjacent to the Chobe River Hotel; thence in a straight line<br />

northwestwards to beacon KH 7 being a beacon on the southern bank of the Chobe River situated approximately<br />

three hundred and twenty-five yards south west of the Chobe River Hotel; thence in a straight line to the point of<br />

commencement....<br />

Note: All bearings are measured on true North. Firebreaks are recor<strong>de</strong>d on Forestry Dept. Map FD 1/9 filed with<br />

the Ministry of Agriculture.']<br />

632. The earliest Plan available, No.TP 6-72-1 dated 15 May 1975, prepared by the<br />

Department of Regional Planning, shows the land limits of the Park as <strong>de</strong>scribed in the<br />

Schedule joining up with the <strong>international</strong> boundary along the Chobe River but no points or<br />

beacons are marked.<br />

633. The 1967 Schedule was amen<strong>de</strong>d by Statutory Instrument No.126 of 1980 (Botswana<br />

Counter-Memorial, Annex 33) which did not alter the location of the limit of the Park in the<br />

vicinity of the Chobe but particularised it in words and by reference to marked points. Plan<br />

BP 179, reproduced at page 255, shows points Y at Ngoma and Z due north in the centre of<br />

the Chobe River;both channels around Kasikili/Sedudu are shown with the <strong>international</strong><br />

boundary drawn in the northern channel; an inset enlargement of Kasane shows point B on the<br />

fringes of Kasane and the line <strong>de</strong>limiting the Park takes an L-shaped route to arrive at point A<br />

shown in the centre of the river with the <strong>international</strong> boundary proceeding northwestwards<br />

into the eastern sector of the northern channel.<br />

G43 - Chobe National Park, Plan BP-179, 1:250,000, 1980, Department of Surveys and<br />

Lands, Gaborone (Map 23 in Supplementary Atlas<br />

G44 - Chobe National Park, Plan BP-179(a), 1:250,000, 1980, Department of Surveys and<br />

Lands, Gaborone (Map 24 in Supplementary Atlas)<br />

634. The limits were again amen<strong>de</strong>d in 1983 and Plan BP 179-a, which was a duplication of<br />

the 1980 Plan, BP 179, and is reproduced at p.257, shows no change in the river sector.<br />

Similarly, in 1987, Statutory Instrument No.9, Plan BP-205, drawn to the smaller scale of<br />

1:350,000, shows a wi<strong>de</strong> black line joining the <strong>international</strong> boundary as it rounds the Island<br />

in the northern channel..'<br />

635. The limits of the Park from the first date of promulgation in 1968 followed the<br />

<strong>international</strong> boundary in the Chobe River and all the Plans make it clear that boundary ran<br />

along the northern channel of the river.<br />

(I) General conclusions on Map evi<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

636. The general conclusions on the map evi<strong>de</strong>nce are as follows:-<br />

I. Map evi<strong>de</strong>nce is of little assistance in the present case because it is inaccurate and<br />

inconsistent in its placement of the boundary.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!