19.11.2012 Views

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"3. There is no doubt that if the wording of the 1890 Treaty is applied to the geographical<br />

facts as they exist today the true inter-territorial boundary would be the northern waterway<br />

and would inclu<strong>de</strong> Kasikili Island in the Protectorate.<br />

4. There is just a possibility that since 1890 when the Treaty was ma<strong>de</strong> the course of the river<br />

has altered - but that proposition could only rest on supposition as there is no direct evi<strong>de</strong>nce<br />

thereof.<br />

....<br />

12. The geographical and Treaty position are clearly in favour of Bechuanaland but I feel<br />

that I would be failing in my duty to the tribesmen were I to recommend alternative No. I in<br />

view of their long and undisturbed use of the island. If the acceptance of the Bechuanaland<br />

case is however irresistible, then I would recommend alternative No. II.' (emphasis supplied;<br />

Namibia Memorial, Annex 61)<br />

746. Thus Trollope accepts that the main channel is the northern channel. The other<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rations (not set forth above) consist of his own amateur suppositions concerning a case<br />

based upon prescription. In this context, the suggestion that the Bechuanaland Administration<br />

failed to object in face of cultivation of the island by 'Caprivi tribesmen' is based upon the<br />

false premiss that such cultivation had legal implications and therefore some objection was<br />

called for.<br />

747. Trollope's letter was forwar<strong>de</strong>d to the Secretary for External Affairs (Pretoria) with a<br />

request for advice. In his covering letter the Secretary for Native Affairs stated the following:<br />

"I have the honour to forward herewith for your consi<strong>de</strong>ration a copy of minute No. 17/15/2-5<br />

of the 21st January, 1948, received from the Magistrate, Eastern Caprivi Zipfel, relating to the<br />

ownership of an island known as "Kasikili" in the Chobe River.<br />

I am unable to find anything directly bearing on the point in the records of this office, and<br />

there is nothing I could usefully add to the Magistrate's representations.<br />

The position would appear to be:-<br />

(a) that according to Article three of the Agreement between Germany and Great Britain<br />

respecting the <strong>de</strong>limitation of the possessions of the two countries and their respective spheres<br />

of influence in South Africa, which was signed at Berlin on the 1st July, 1890, the boundary<br />

line between what is now the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel and the Bechuanaland Protectorate<br />

'<strong>de</strong>scends the centre' of the main channel of the Chobe river to its junction with the Zambesi.<br />

(b) that the island in question probably lies on the Bechuanaland Protectorate si<strong>de</strong> of this line;<br />

(c) that the island has been ma<strong>de</strong> use of by the Caprivi Zipfel Natives as part of their territory<br />

for over 40 years at least and is still being used by them, without any objection on the part of<br />

the Bechuanaland and Protectorate authorities.<br />

Will you kindly advise me what the position is?" (Letter dated 9 April 1948; Botswana<br />

Counter-Memorial, Annex 19).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!