19.11.2012 Views

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(c) any relevant rules of <strong>international</strong> law applicable in the relations between the parties."<br />

(emphasis supplied)<br />

(iii) The Argument of Namibia based upon Prescription is incompatible with the<br />

Principle of Subsequent Conduct<br />

247. By way of conclusion on the topic of subsequent conduct, the Government of Botswana<br />

would respectfully draw the attention of the <strong>Cour</strong>t to the remarkable inconsistency in the<br />

modalities adopted in the Namibian treatment of subsequent conduct (Part Two, Chapter 1 of<br />

the Namibian Memorial).<br />

248. The Namibian Government <strong>de</strong>liberately places subsequent conduct, as an aspect of treaty<br />

interpretation, in the same framework as prescription, acquiescence and recognition, as<br />

in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt forms of acquisition of territory (Namibian Memorial, p.60, para. 165). The<br />

distinct subjects are placed together in a Chapter with the heading: 'The legal relevance of the<br />

subsequent conduct of the parties to a treaty'.<br />

249. The difficulty which arises is that subsequent conduct is a facet of a lawful status quo: a<br />

boundary created by the provisions of a treaty. In contrast, prescription, as plea<strong>de</strong>d by<br />

Namibia, involves an adverse possession which displaces the lawful status quo. To seek to<br />

combine these elements in the same vehicle must involve a high <strong>de</strong>gree of optimism. The<br />

question of prescriptive title will be examined further in Chapter 9 of this Counter-Memorial.<br />

CHAPTER 5<br />

The Scientific Evi<strong>de</strong>nce Presented on Behalf of Namibia<br />

(A) Botswana's Case<br />

250. The approach of Botswana to the issue before the <strong>Cour</strong>t can be summarised in short<br />

answers to three questions:-<br />

(i) What is the geographical feature referred to in Article III of the Anglo-German Agreement<br />

of 1890?<br />

Answer: The Chobe River.<br />

(ii) Which is the main channel?<br />

Answer: the northern and western channel around Kasikili/ Sedudu Island.<br />

(iii) Why?<br />

Answer: Its greater <strong>de</strong>pth, width and its bed profile configuration, and all the<br />

geomorphological and hydrological evi<strong>de</strong>nce, indicate that it is the navigable channel capable<br />

of and carrying the greater flow of water. (For a fuller account of the approach of Botswana

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!