botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice
botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice
botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the herds have taken to crossing onto Sedudu Island to feed during the winter months. These<br />
buffalo cross the Southern Channel with ease.'<br />
66. The Affidavit of Michael Slogrove is of particular significance. His tenure as Senior<br />
Game War<strong>de</strong>n overlapped with an increase in inci<strong>de</strong>nts involving armed poachers. In his<br />
opinion the Island formed part of the Chobe National Park. As he observes in his Affidavit:<br />
'I had at all times regar<strong>de</strong>d Sedudu Island as part of the Chobe National Park, and in<strong>de</strong>ed I did<br />
confirm with the first Presi<strong>de</strong>nt of the Republic of Botswana, Sir Seretse Khama, that the<br />
Island was part of the Park. This was during a visit to Kasane by the late Presi<strong>de</strong>nt in 1972.'<br />
67. Mr Slogrove <strong>de</strong>scribes an episo<strong>de</strong> in 1976 in which he and some assistants confronted two<br />
armed poachers on the Island. He also <strong>de</strong>scribes the erection of a buoy in the middle of the<br />
river, with a signpost to the effect that river traffic was entering Chobe National Park and that<br />
permits were required.<br />
68. It is clear from the evi<strong>de</strong>nce of these officials that no cultivation took place on the Island<br />
in the period 1961 to 1979.<br />
69. Two other sources of evi<strong>de</strong>nce confirm the absence of agricultural activities on the Island<br />
in this period. In the first place, the Honourable Chief Moraliswani had confirmed, in his<br />
evi<strong>de</strong>nce to the JTTE that the people of Kasika ceased cultivation on the Island in 1937:<br />
Namibian Memorial, Vol. III, Annex 2, p.209. Secondly, the aerial photographs taken in 1943<br />
(at page 27), 1962, May 1972, November 1972, 1981 and 1985, show no signs of settlement<br />
or other human activity (see the Attachment to this Counter-Memorial).<br />
(iv) The Hypothesis of Discussions in 1974-5<br />
70. An internal South African Defence Force memorandum (dated 27 November 1984)<br />
contains the following passage:<br />
"6. Kindly note that, already in 1974/75 discussions took place between the RSA and<br />
Botswana regarding Sidudu/Kasiua (sic) territory. It is reported that at the time, it was agreed<br />
that Sidudu formed part of the Caprivi. Efforts to obtain the minutes of the discussions have<br />
thus far been unsuccessful, and it seems unlikely that it would still be found." (Namibian<br />
Memorial, Annex 84).<br />
71. The Botswana Government has no record of such a meeting, and the South African<br />
authorities admit that they have no record. The passage quoted above constitutes<br />
unsubstantiated hearsay and Namibia's reliance upon it should be discounted: see the<br />
Namibian Memorial, p.100, para. 248; p.115, para. 282.<br />
(G) The Intergovernmental Agreement of 1984 and the Joint Survey Report of 1985<br />
72. After an inci<strong>de</strong>nt involving Botswana and South African Defence Forces in November<br />
1984, the Governments of Botswana and South Africa agreed to constitute a team to carry out<br />
a joint survey for the express purpose of <strong>de</strong>termining whether the 'main channel' of the Chobe<br />
River was located to the north or to the south of Kasikili/Sedudu Island: see the Botswana<br />
Memorial, pages 75-85.