19.11.2012 Views

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the herds have taken to crossing onto Sedudu Island to feed during the winter months. These<br />

buffalo cross the Southern Channel with ease.'<br />

66. The Affidavit of Michael Slogrove is of particular significance. His tenure as Senior<br />

Game War<strong>de</strong>n overlapped with an increase in inci<strong>de</strong>nts involving armed poachers. In his<br />

opinion the Island formed part of the Chobe National Park. As he observes in his Affidavit:<br />

'I had at all times regar<strong>de</strong>d Sedudu Island as part of the Chobe National Park, and in<strong>de</strong>ed I did<br />

confirm with the first Presi<strong>de</strong>nt of the Republic of Botswana, Sir Seretse Khama, that the<br />

Island was part of the Park. This was during a visit to Kasane by the late Presi<strong>de</strong>nt in 1972.'<br />

67. Mr Slogrove <strong>de</strong>scribes an episo<strong>de</strong> in 1976 in which he and some assistants confronted two<br />

armed poachers on the Island. He also <strong>de</strong>scribes the erection of a buoy in the middle of the<br />

river, with a signpost to the effect that river traffic was entering Chobe National Park and that<br />

permits were required.<br />

68. It is clear from the evi<strong>de</strong>nce of these officials that no cultivation took place on the Island<br />

in the period 1961 to 1979.<br />

69. Two other sources of evi<strong>de</strong>nce confirm the absence of agricultural activities on the Island<br />

in this period. In the first place, the Honourable Chief Moraliswani had confirmed, in his<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce to the JTTE that the people of Kasika ceased cultivation on the Island in 1937:<br />

Namibian Memorial, Vol. III, Annex 2, p.209. Secondly, the aerial photographs taken in 1943<br />

(at page 27), 1962, May 1972, November 1972, 1981 and 1985, show no signs of settlement<br />

or other human activity (see the Attachment to this Counter-Memorial).<br />

(iv) The Hypothesis of Discussions in 1974-5<br />

70. An internal South African Defence Force memorandum (dated 27 November 1984)<br />

contains the following passage:<br />

"6. Kindly note that, already in 1974/75 discussions took place between the RSA and<br />

Botswana regarding Sidudu/Kasiua (sic) territory. It is reported that at the time, it was agreed<br />

that Sidudu formed part of the Caprivi. Efforts to obtain the minutes of the discussions have<br />

thus far been unsuccessful, and it seems unlikely that it would still be found." (Namibian<br />

Memorial, Annex 84).<br />

71. The Botswana Government has no record of such a meeting, and the South African<br />

authorities admit that they have no record. The passage quoted above constitutes<br />

unsubstantiated hearsay and Namibia's reliance upon it should be discounted: see the<br />

Namibian Memorial, p.100, para. 248; p.115, para. 282.<br />

(G) The Intergovernmental Agreement of 1984 and the Joint Survey Report of 1985<br />

72. After an inci<strong>de</strong>nt involving Botswana and South African Defence Forces in November<br />

1984, the Governments of Botswana and South Africa agreed to constitute a team to carry out<br />

a joint survey for the express purpose of <strong>de</strong>termining whether the 'main channel' of the Chobe<br />

River was located to the north or to the south of Kasikili/Sedudu Island: see the Botswana<br />

Memorial, pages 75-85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!