19.11.2012 Views

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

botswana/namibia - Cour international de Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

more general point of continuity the Government of Botswana observes that during the JTTE<br />

proceedings both si<strong>de</strong>s relied upon transactions involving the South African Government in<br />

their submissions.<br />

(iii) The Prohibition of Agricultural Activities as a Result of the Establishment of the<br />

Chobe Game Reserve: the Absence of Protest from the South African Authorities in the<br />

Period 1960 to 1992<br />

58. The Namibian case is built upon an alleged 'occupation' of the Island by the Basubia,<br />

allegedly on behalf of the South African Government, in the period of the Mandate, and<br />

thereafter until Namibia's in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce in 1990 (Namibian Memorial, p.100, para. 249). The<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce available indicates that from 1960 onwards all cultivation was prohibited on the<br />

island by the authorities of British Bechuanaland and Botswana as a consequence of the<br />

establishment of the Chobe Game Reserve (subsequently constituted as the Chobe National<br />

Park).<br />

59. If the Namibian allegations of fact had any basis, the exclusion of the Basubia from the<br />

Island would have provoked protests from the authorities in South West Africa. In fact no<br />

representation was ma<strong>de</strong> until March 1992 (Botswana Counter-Memorial, Annex 43). When a<br />

representation was ma<strong>de</strong>, it related to the proposal from a Namibian entrepreneur to construct<br />

a tourist centre on the Island, and had no relation to cultivation.<br />

60. This picture is confirmed by the talks between a '<strong>de</strong>legation of Caprivians' and a Botswana<br />

<strong>de</strong>legation in 1981 at Katima Mulilo. The Minutes of the meeting appear in the Botswana<br />

Memorial, Annex 29. The meeting was concerned to discuss local problems and yet no single<br />

reference was ma<strong>de</strong> to Kasikili/Sedudu Island. The Namibian Government accepts this but<br />

asserts, without any supporting evi<strong>de</strong>nce, that this was because 'both parties were satisfied<br />

that Sidudu was part of Caprivi' (Namibian Memorial, p.115, para. 282, quoting a South<br />

African document of 1984).<br />

61. The Chobe Game Reserve was established by High Commissioner's Notice No. 65 of<br />

1960 (Botswana Memorial, Annex 32). Both this measure and subsequent legislation provi<strong>de</strong>d<br />

that the northern boundary of the Game Reserve correspon<strong>de</strong>d with the <strong>international</strong> boundary<br />

of the Bechuanaland Protectorate and of Botswana. The subsequent legislation was as<br />

follows:<br />

(i) The Fauna Conservation Proclamation, 1961 (Botswana Memorial, Annex 33). (First<br />

Schedule).<br />

(ii) Government Notice No. 86 of 1964 (Botswana Memorial, Annex 34).<br />

(iii) The National Parks Act, 1967 (Botswana Memorial, Annex 37) (Schedule (Section 3))<br />

(and see also Botswana Counter-Memorial, Annex 31).<br />

(iv) The Chobe National Park (Amendment of Boundary) Or<strong>de</strong>r, 1980 (Botswana Counter-<br />

Memorial, Annex 33).<br />

(v) The National Parks Constitution Or<strong>de</strong>r, 1987 (Botswana Counter-Memorial, Annex 38).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!