God we trust" on our sixty-five cent silver dollar.This religious acknowledgment stands at the head ofT h e Ghristian flatioD our charters and they also state that the purpose ofthe expedition was to spread the Gospel among theA Journal of <strong>Christian</strong> Civilization. Indians. It is not the purpose to depreciate the valuein evidence of these charters, most of whioh were annulledWEDNESDAY, MAECH 1, <strong>18</strong>93,New Yokk,two centuries ago, but when we remember bywhom they were given, the real purpose of the companyand the time whioh has elapsed since they wereTerms: 5 cents a copy ; $ 1 50 a year, in advance the constitutions of the settlements, it does not seemEditor and Manager,John W. Pritchard.Associate Editors :Eev. W. J. Ooleman,Eev. 0. D. Trumbull, D. D.,Prof. J. M. Ooleman.Department Editors :Department of Missions, Eev. F. M. Foster.Sabbath School Lesson, Eev. T. P. Eobb.Primrary S. S. Lesson, Grace Hamilton Ge<strong>org</strong>e.Prayermeeting Topic, Eev. T. H. Acheson,The Week in Review, Prof. J, M. Littlejohn,Literary, Educational, Harriet S. Pritchard.Helpful Corner, Eev. Wm. Littlejohn.Mrs. Eev, E. J. Ge<strong>org</strong>e,Beaver Falls, Pa.Childreri 's Corner,Mrs, M, S. Gibson,New Castle, Pa,IS AMERICA A CHRISTIAN NATION?the oustoms of the people. It is one cause of gratitudefor the past and of hopefulness for the futureIs this a <strong>Christian</strong> nation? This question is answeredaffirmatively in a recent decision of the Supremethat our national customs are, so generally, molded byCourt. On the other hand the St. Louis Republic<strong>Christian</strong>ity. But suppose that a nation followed,takes the negative side and denies that the Supremein general, the teaching of <strong>Christian</strong>ity, would thatCourt was sound either in law or evidence, when itmake it a <strong>Christian</strong> natiou? It is not necessary toasserted this to be "a <strong>Christian</strong> nation." Which isexplain to the readers of the Chbistian <strong>Nation</strong> thatright? It is not a question which a Covenanter shouldGod has the same standard for nations as for individuals.The oolleciive body is judged by the samepass lightly by, for its answer affects our position- asa churoh.law as the private member. God allows no doubleThere are two positions from one or other ofstandard ot law. According to this law there is butwhioh the Supreme Court must defend it« statement;either that the nation is only a collection of individualsand not an <strong>org</strong>anism, or that being an <strong>org</strong>anic body itstill may be Christiau without confessing Christ. Thefirst positiou is clearly refuted by political science; thesecond, by the Bible.In order to understand the position of the Court, itwill be necessary to review the arguments which leadto the conclusion that this is "a <strong>Christian</strong> nation."As we recall the line of argument it may fairly besummed up under two heads,1. That which is f urnishea by documents. It ishardly worth while, unless for rhetorical purposes, torefer so far back as Columbus, so we may begin withthe Colonial Charters. By whom and for what purposeswere these charters »?iven? These charterswere not framed and adopted by the firstsettlers butwere given by tue king and would be much more valuableas showing the position of the English monarchthan of the colonists A more important fact is thatthese charters were not given to colonies whioh wereexpeoted to form a state in the future, but to tradingcompanies. The Stuarts who granted charters toNorth and South Virginia were not moved by a benevolentpurpose to estahlish a rival England across theAtlantic. The immediate object was trade, the ultimate,was money. The Crown had no different purposein view than in the chartering of the East IndiaCompany a few years before. Then we might ask, ifcertain expressions in American charters make thisnation <strong>Christian</strong>, would like expressions in the EastIndia charters prove India a <strong>Christian</strong> nation?As it was quite evident at many times that the Engishking did not hold his position by the grace of thepeople he began his state papers with thephrase " Kingby the grace of God," something like the motto " InCHEISIIAN NATION. <strong>Vol</strong>ume <strong>18</strong>.that they would prove us to-day "a <strong>Christian</strong> nation."Another document brought forward, at times, to affirmthe position of the Court, is the Declaration ofIndependence in which Jefferson refers to "nature'sGod." Whom or what Jefferson meant by it is hardto determine. It oould not be the sovereign God, forhe spelled it "god," it oould not be the <strong>Christian</strong>'sGod, for Jefferson said that "Jesus Ohrist was tooshort a time on earth to formulate a eomplete systemof morals."Turning to the State constitutions, we findin someof them the name of God, b'jt this is not enough. Thewe must part company on "the reasons annexed."The Republic goes on to declare that ' 'It was neverJew would go that far and he is not a <strong>Christian</strong>. '' He intended that this should be a <strong>Christian</strong> nation."that honoreth not the Son honoreth not the Fatherwhioh sent him." In some of the State constitutionsframed during the Eevolutionary period are found requirementsfor <strong>Christian</strong> legislators but none for<strong>Christian</strong> .legislation. In no oase is fcheauthority ofGod, of Christ, or of his law, acknowledged as bindingon government.2, The other line of evidence brought to supportthe claim that this is a Ohristian nation, is based onone way given in whioh an individnal can become aOhristian. He must confess Christ, not alone secretlyout hefore men. Leading what is called a moral lifedoes nofrmake a mana <strong>Christian</strong>, Will it, then, provea nation <strong>Christian</strong> to show it has Christiau oustoms?If a nation has an <strong>org</strong>anic character, the argumentisworth as muoh in oue case as the other. Some holdthat confession of Christ is not necessary for man'ssalvation; these could logically claim it to be unnecessaryfor a nation.It is possible that this is the position taken by theSupreme Court, but there is another premise ouwhioh they may bass tbeir conclusion, Itis that thenation is not an <strong>org</strong>anism at all, but is like a businesspartneship. This is the theory of individualism whiohwas systematized by Hobbes and Locke and madepopular by the writings of Eoussean, According toit the nation is a firm In whioh the members contracttogether to carry out certain purposes. If this be atrue theory, there is no need for a national confessionof Jesus Ohrist to make us a <strong>Christian</strong> nation.That the members of the Court still hold the contracttheory of the nation is not at all improbable.Though individualism is defunct as a theory in philosophy,it is still a working principle in political life.Ithas so permeated every line of thought and actionthat it will take time for its virus to work out of thesocial system. Political Economists from Adam Smithalmost up to the present time take the "isolatedman," moved only by selflshness, as the subject oftheir study. Among students of law the conservativetendency is even more marked. Like a Chinaman,what they want is a precedent, and this causes themto ndhere to past ideas. This natural tendency is em.phasized by the study of Blackstone whose politicalphilosophy, so far as he had any, was individualistic,and as he wrote over a century ago and his ideas wereof tha century which preceded him, it makes his conclusionssomewhat antiquated in the present, Bulthere is hope even for the legal fraternity. ProfessorBurgess has published a work entitled "PoliticalScience and Constitutional liw " whose introductorypages give one of the best statements which has yetbeen written of the <strong>org</strong>anic conception of the state.There are, then, two propositions on which theCourt may seek to sustain the decision that this " Is a<strong>Christian</strong> nation." First, on the theory that the nationis not an <strong>org</strong>anism but a partnership and becomes<strong>Christian</strong> through confession of Christ by individualmerabers; seoond, that it is an <strong>org</strong>anism bntmay be <strong>Christian</strong> without any formal confession ofChrist. We do not believe that either of these positionsis according to the "law and the evidence."But while we are willing to go with our esteemedcotemporary so far as the Court decision is concernedNow unless the Republic has had some later communicationfrom the Puritans than is given to less favoredmortals, we venture to say that it is mistaken.The editor of the Republic was not at Plymouth norat Boston at that time, nor, perhaps, any of his relatives.It may be part of the eternal plan that thisshould become, at some time, a Cnristian nation; andif this be the fact the opposition of St, Louis eventhough it should make peace with Chicago, as Pilateand Herod did on a former occasion, even this will notprevent it from coming to pass.He says it was not intended that any Jew or anyheathen should be compelled to ask any number of<strong>Christian</strong>s for toleration in A.merica, If the Republichad said it had not been necessary, he would havibeen correct. It is toleration for <strong>Christian</strong>ity that wewant. One would suppose from the zeal shown bysecular papers in insisting on such respeot for theconscience of the Jews and the heathen as will preventthe passage of <strong>Christian</strong> laws, that the editorsbelonged to one or other of these favored classes.What about the oonscienoe of <strong>Christian</strong>s? Shall ithave any respect? It is a rather novel idea perhaps,but is it not about time that some one should make aplea for the <strong>Christian</strong>'s conscience? Even <strong>Christian</strong>sthemselves insist that we should not put the name inour Constitution whioh was written on the cross becausethe Jew could not swear to it without violatinghis conscience. It would be accepting Christ. If theJew cannot swear to the Constitution with Christ'sname m, how can the <strong>Christian</strong> swear to that documentif Christ's name be left out ? If the first is acceptingChrist, is not the second denying Him?What about the <strong>Christian</strong>'s conscience? We hopethat the time may soon come when <strong>Christian</strong>s willhave as muoh respect for their own conscience as theyhave for that of the Jew, We may be egotistic, butwe have reached that position now.The Republic relies solely on the power of truth.What it meaus is, that no laws should be made tocarry out its provi-dons and no violent means suoh asmagistrates and constables brought into use Truthis a g )od thing to rely on. We can imagine 'a thiefcoming into the sanctum of the editor of the Republicwhen he is engaged in writing an article on personalliberiy. The* thief gathers up the editor's newcoat and hat The editor sees him bnt says in hisheart that he is going to "Eely on truth," and go-:son with his article, at least this is the consistentthing for him to do.Why should the eighth command be enforced by policeany more than the fourth ? Both belonged to thesame code and were given to the same people at thesame time. One has just aa good a right to be enforcedby the police iis the other. The fact seems tobe that men are willing to "Eely on the truth," whenthe property of others is being taken, but t) protecttheir own they want truth plus a constable. It is allright to steal from God, but you must not steal frommen, or we will send you to jail. It makes all thedifference whose ox is gored. Some are very slow tof<strong>org</strong>ive of have liberty to perfect Ehime do The their bring right, is " Republic law their Lord. religious does in all to of St. pf-rsons enemies serve not liberty. Louis. sajB: liberty." mean God, and who the "The Eeligious and classes readily kind This it truest is into they is f<strong>org</strong>ive liberty true, harmony have <strong>Christian</strong>ity duty the but " of liberty Over enemies the religions with we state the the to
Mar. ], <strong>18</strong>93.A FAMILY PAPEE.TheWeek.—Mrs. H. S. Pritchard has been appointed StateSuperintendent of theDepartment of Purity in Literatureand Art in conneotion with the W. C. T. U. forthe State of New Tork. She has started her work inthis Department by a movement on behalf of Purity inthe exhibits of art at the World's Fair.—News has come to us that Dr. Metheny has purchasedfrom the American Board Missionaries at Adaua,Tarsus, a building for Mission purposes. The buildingis 100x40 feet and costs only $3100. He appealsto the church to sustain him in this movement of missionextension. It is the Lord's work.—On Wednesday, Washington's Birthday anniversary,the President of the United States hoisted thestars and stripes on the S, S, City of New Tork, onher becoming a Tankee ship. She is the firstof theocean liners to flythe American flag. She is to runwith her sister the Oity of Paris as an Americanmailer from New Tork to Southampton.—A New Tork chemist before the whiskey trust investigationat Washington, testified that he had examinedsome of the essences and essential oils used incompounding spirits. Some of them were poisonousand would cause death if a tablespoonful of them weretaken. All were hurtful to health.—In consequence of the destruction of crops byfrost last summer famine and disease are now preva.lent throughout Finland. More than 200,000 are dependentupon charity. They have eaten most of theirdraught animals and pets. Typhus fever is carryingoff hundreds daily,—Lady Henry Somerset, President of the W, C.T. U,, desiies to enlarge the activity of the <strong>org</strong>anization,and to this end "jas secured the appointment of alarge executive oommittee. She is star,ting a papercalled The Woman's Herald which will be an exponentof the broader policy of the world's W, 0. T. U,—The Populist administration is preparing for acomplete overhauling of the state militia. The Eepublicanoflicers are to be discharged and the <strong>org</strong>anizationof the army oonfiued to Populists. This portendsevil times,—This week has seen the worst storm that hascome for years. Great damage has been done by windand snow in several states, and the railroad lines havebeen broken up, rendering travel almost impossible.Many dwelling houses are in ruins. The ocean hasnot been exempt, incoming steamers reporting theexcessive severity of weather. Europe has been sweptby a severe storm of wind and rain. Australia inseveral places is flooded.—Wazen in Morocco has been attacked by a bandof rebels. The citizens permitted them to enter thecity, closed the gates and attacked the rebel forces.The streets were scenes of dreadful carnage for severalhours.—General Beauregard died at his home in NewOrleans on Feb. 20th. He figuredas a brigadier inthe Confederate army during the Civil War. He ledthe Confederates in the bombardment of Fort Sumterand at Bull Eun, After the death of General Johnsonhe assumed chief command.—The pealing of the church bells at Eome an-,nounced the celebration of the Pope's Episcopal jubilee.Thousands of pilgrims have thronged St.Peter's, led by the cardinalate from different countriesto pay homage to Leo XIII. Ihe display in the palaceand the g<strong>org</strong>eous ceremonials in the cathedral, arem marked contrast with the unpretending humilityof the Ohrist, whom the Pope claims to represent onearth.^ —Dr. Sanday, of Oxford, England, has puolished aBfrmon preached before the University of Cambridgein which he discusses what he calls the " Social move-[inent,'' Dr. Sanday is well known to the ohurch asone of the ablest living theologians. He does notthink that the <strong>Christian</strong> teacher is, as such, compelledto enforce rights. If anv class of our social order oppresses another elass, then if the case be clear, the<strong>Christian</strong> teacher may go to the oppressor and remonstratewith him. He may urge the claims of dutyupon the offending class; but he is not concerned as a<strong>Christian</strong> to go to the class aggrieved, emphasize theirgrievance and help them to prosecute it. <strong>Christian</strong>itvprefers, Dr. Sanday says, to speak thus to the injured individuals—"Blessed are ye that hunger now, for yeshall ba filled.Blessed are ye that weep now, for yeshall laugh," " Far better," he goes on, "to be defraudedthan to defraud; far bettor to be oppressedthan to oppress; far better to suffer wrong than to dowrong," This doctrine is to be commended to thosewho are rapidly transforming the idea of the church ;conceiving (he church to be rather a social institutionthan a spiritual society, the home of God's people, andthe centre of priestly service. It is time to return tothe standpoints of the New Testament and the subapostolicage. The cry is raised, back to the Catholicfold—churches are everywhere conforming to the ritualof what is called the historic episcopate, but suchmen are frequently most unoatholio in thought andspeech. We hope that Presbyterianism will go backto the New Testament, avoiding the vagaries andunoatholio tendencies of High churchism and the individualistictemper of church socialism,REVIEW OF THE WEEK,In the Chrisiian at Work for Feb, 23, the followingappears: "With reference to the subject of instructingtheologioal students to preach without theuse of the manuscript treated recently in our editorialcolumns, the Eev. F. M. Foster, pastor of the thirdE, P. churoh this oity writes aa follows :Editor <strong>Christian</strong> at Work : It is with satisfactionI have read your editorials on "The Sermon Paperand the Seminary," They are strong arguments andon right lines. May your voice be lifted until everyminister in the land has read your words. I am gladto say that there is now one Seminary where " Homileticsis taught to the exclusion of tha Sermon Paper,''viz: the Eeformed Presbyteriau, Allegheny, Pa.The students in attendance on Seminary are taughtto preach without using the Manuscript, We werepleased to read the vigorous defence of preaching ashanded down from the apostles of Ohrist, Bt-centlya great many periodicals, on the other side of the Atlanticas well as on this side, have been taking up theapologetic on behalf of read sermons. The puerilearguments used to establish such a sophistical conclusionreminded us of the sarcasm of a little stcry,A minister happened to drop in unawares upon an oldman who was sitting reading at his Bible, The parsoninnocently asked the aged man, " What are youpleads with the members of the coming Assembly todrop the heresy trials. Its argument is that furtherargumention is undesirable, b.cause the questions atissue are in regard to the recent light thrown uponthe fieldof theology by scholarship and criticism ; andto forbid such fresh discoveries in the fieldof Divinityis to impair the efficiency of ths pulpit and the seminary—infact it is to chase out of the church the foremostthinkers of the age, who have gone farthest intheir critical investigations. It seems to ns that sucha plea, coming as it professes from the friends of truth,is self contradictory. We dispute the premises andthe conclusion. We are willing to acknowledge in itsfullest extent the progressive oharacter of divine revelationand the increasing light thrown upon everydepartment of thought by the lapse of ages, but wehave not yet learned that any science has given fullplay to faucy, or haa permitted human hypothesis totake tbe place of ascertained facts and truths ; norhave we been able to learn that any branch of knowledgedeserving the name has long survived when itset up human reason as the infallible idol of its adoration.We do not eveu grant that the bast and mostprofound intellects of the age have joined the ranksof the higher criticism. Some bold and daring spiritshave gone where even angels fear to tread and theyhave pointed the pathway to others; but the mostcultured minds as well as the most sympathetic heartshave been led on by the inspiring genius of the Spiritof Ohrist to decipher inscriptions, to rake among theruins of antiquity aud to read the story of geography,history, ethnology and geology, only to return to thesolid plane to feel that when they stand on the graniterook of fche Holy Scripture they find an impregnablefoundation. This is an age of unrest. But wehave no fearforthe Bible and its holy truths. Ifc oamethrough the firesof persecution, rose above the hydraheadederrorism of early apostacy, preserved itselffrom the decay and obliteration that destroyed everyhuman institution, and it will outlive the attacks of afierce hypocritical and secularizing spirit that is takingpossession of the leaders in the vd,n of modernthought.* **Thomas Carlyle wrote these solemn words that maybe reckoned as a true judgment regarding the men oftoday: " The duty assigned to GoJ by the prtsentgeneration is merely to keep the whtels of the physicaluniverse going sweetly. Moral supervision on thepart of Deity is deemed a superfluous intrusion."Our ears tingle from day to day as we hear professedly<strong>Christian</strong> men talking of secular and civil affairsas if man alone had any right to be consulted in suchmatters. We cannot conceive of any situation in life,of any <strong>org</strong>anization among men, or of any duty eitherdoing today?" "I'm prophesying,' was the curt owed or performed, that onght not to sustain somereply, "Why, what do you mean," said the pastor. definite relationt.,) God in Heaven, and His representativein human affairs, Jesus Christ. " Duty has noThe quaint reply wfls, "Gin readin' a sermon ispreachin', readin' a prophecy will b» prophesyin', " meaning and no sanction except as implying responsibilityto a powtr above and beyond humanity." ItThe reply needs no comment. It seems to the writerthat there are only two excuses for the distasteful is a mystery to us how a man can initiate himstlf intohabit of reading sermons, either pure and simple carelessness and neglect of preparation, or else a timidity I hood ; how a <strong>Christian</strong> oan sell his freedom of con-a secret order that takes away tbe liberty of his manthatis afraid to trust to the promise of God's Holy I science to get a place in a corrupt political party, orSpirit. Iu the former case, negligence becomes a 1 J3in a municipal ring that has as ? obief end of existsinon the part of a servant of Jesus Christ ; in the I ence tbe completion of acts of jobbery.latter case want of trustfulness is a barrier to the efflcient performance of the highest and noblest work I *,f,* At a meeting of the Northern Presbytery of the—among men. A man who has the Holy Spirit in theI E. i'. ohurch, Ireland, Feb. 14th, the Eev. Jamesi L'ttlejohn, father of Eev. Wm. and J. M. Littlejohnwriting of a sermon, will likewise receive the Spiriti resigned his charge of the congregation of Garvagh.in the delivery of it, if he but lay claim to the ascensiongift of the risen Lord. " The gift of tongues": Presbytery expressed its admiration of his services toj thechurch. fle has preached iu Ireland for seventeenis the perpetual promised miracle of the ministry of1 years. Prior to his settlement in Ireland he praachedChrist, and itis surely worth the asking and the usingI for sixteen years in 8o(3tla!id, and is the only livingwhen gifted so mercifully.• minister of the church who t > k part in the famous*disruption of <strong>18</strong>63. ^^^^__Two HUNDRED and thirty fiveministers of the Presbyterianohurch have presented a plea for peace. It Milk train in coll'sion; no milkman turns np ; disapSERIOUS RAILWAY ACCIDENT,pointed housekeepers ; coffee without cream A pettyannoyance resulting from a neglect to keep the GailBordin Eagle Brand Condensed Milk in the house.Order now for future exigencies fiom Grocer orDruggist,
- Page 1 and 2:
^r^JL Al JtL lim iV Ai AlMMAVMmj^ i
- Page 3 and 4:
Jan. 4.1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 3.A CH
- Page 5 and 6:
Jan. 4,1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 5.dead
- Page 7 and 8:
Jan. 4,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.propriat
- Page 9 and 10:
Jan. 4, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 9.p<
- Page 11:
Jan. 4,1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11.Fre
- Page 14 and 15:
CHEISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.T h e Gh
- Page 16 and 17:
CHEISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.THE BRIG
- Page 18 and 19:
CHEISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.at no sm
- Page 20 and 21:
CHEISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.T h e Gh
- Page 22 and 23:
10. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.CHR
- Page 24 and 25:
12, CHRISTIAN NATION. Volume 18, Ja
- Page 26 and 27:
CHEISTIAN NATION. Volnme 18.probabl
- Page 28 and 29:
CHEISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.the conf
- Page 30 and 31:
6. CHEISriAN NATION. Volume 18.tion
- Page 32 and 33:
CHEISTIAN NATION.Volnme 18,T h e Gh
- Page 34 and 35:
10. CHRISTIAN NATIO^T. Volnme is;A
- Page 36 and 37:
CHRISTIAN NATION.Volame 18, Jan. 18
- Page 38 and 39:
2. CHRISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.Ci3^
- Page 40 and 41:
CHRISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.the U. 8
- Page 42 and 43:
6. CHRISIIAN NATION. Volume 18.and
- Page 44 and 45:
T h e GhFistiao latioD."WEDNESDAY,
- Page 46 and 47:
10. CHRISTIAN NATION.Volume 18.Sin
- Page 48 and 49:
12 CHRISIIAN NATIOJN. Volume 18, Ja
- Page 50 and 51:
"Qo;ye.ir\t6.6.irt1\e Wor)
- Page 52 and 53: 4. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.his
- Page 54 and 55: t;.T h e GhristiaD flation-4 Journa
- Page 56 and 57: 8. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.T h
- Page 58 and 59: 10. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.TAD
- Page 60 and 61: 12. CHEISTIAN NATION.Volume 18. Feb
- Page 62 and 63: Cib;yCfr\t5.6.irt1ve'Wor}(^,Ssi\^ p
- Page 64 and 65: 4. CHRISTIAN NATION.can we reasonab
- Page 66 and 67: 6. CHEISIIAN NATION.T h e GhFistiao
- Page 68 and 69: 8. CHRISTIAN NATION.T h e G h M s t
- Page 70 and 71: 10. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.TEN
- Page 72 and 73: 12. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18, Fe
- Page 74 and 75: 2. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18,-Qo.
- Page 76 and 77: Sabbath School Lesson,LESSON X,, SA
- Page 78 and 79: CHEISIIAN NATION,V U1U1I16 lo»" Go
- Page 80 and 81: 8. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.T h
- Page 82 and 83: 10. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.(35
- Page 84 and 85: 12. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18, Fe
- Page 86 and 87: 2. CHEISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.ffif
- Page 88 and 89: 4. OHRISTIAN NATION. Volume 18.zati
- Page 90 and 91: T h e GhFistiao KatioDA Journal of
- Page 92 and 93: T h e GhristiaD |atioDWEDNESDAY, FE
- Page 94 and 95: 10.Tbe following metrical version o
- Page 96 and 97: 12. CHRISTIAN NATION. Volume 18, Fe
- Page 98 and 99: Livonia, Pa., Feb. 13,1898.DearFrie
- Page 100 and 101: CHEISTIAN NATION.Tuiuiue 18.Te Bapt
- Page 104 and 105: T h e GhFistiao M mCHEISTIAN NATION
- Page 106 and 107: 10, OHRISTIAN NATION. V olume 18.Mi
- Page 108: 12. CHRISTIAN NATION. Volume 18, Ma
- Page 111 and 112: Mnr, 8,1898. A FAMILT PAPEE. aTHE L
- Page 113 and 114: Mar, 8,1893A FAMILY PAPEE.a God-fea
- Page 115 and 116: Mar. 8, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.the rul
- Page 117 and 118: Mar. 8,1893.A FAMILT PAPER.flm^J^rI
- Page 119 and 120: Mar. 8,1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11.The
- Page 121 and 122: COVEI^N-MENTSHALLUPONHISSHOULDERWha
- Page 123 and 124: Mar. 15.1893.A FAMILT PAPEE.FRUITLE
- Page 125 and 126: Mar. 15,1893 | A FAMILY PAPER. 6.Th
- Page 127 and 128: Mar. 15 1893. A FAMILY PAPER. 7,dec
- Page 129 and 130: lar. 16, 1893.A FAMILY PAPER.I LOVE
- Page 131 and 132: Mar..15 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11.Ti
- Page 133 and 134: -rIGHTEQIE X A L Tr:^S0L0M0N.b:t==C
- Page 135 and 136: Mar. 22.1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.NEEDS O
- Page 137 and 138: Mar. 22,1893A FAMILY PAPEE.him on t
- Page 139 and 140: Mar. 22, 1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 7.pr
- Page 141 and 142: Mar. 22, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.I LOVE
- Page 143 and 144: Mar. iia, lovo. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11.
- Page 145 and 146: ^ICHTEOEISNESSEXALTElfPT^-NATIONC^O
- Page 147 and 148: Mar. 29.1893. A FAMILT PAPER. 3.T h
- Page 149 and 150: Mar. 29,1893A FAMILY PAPER.by m vai
- Page 151 and 152: Mar. 29, 1893. A FAMILY PAPER. 7.ni
- Page 153 and 154:
Mar. 29,1893.A FAMILT PAPER.1 LOVE
- Page 155 and 156:
Mar. 29,1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11.It
- Page 157 and 158:
^ ^ ^ ^ n n ^ n m^^I G H T E O O S
- Page 159 and 160:
April 5,1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 3.Can
- Page 161 and 162:
April 5,1893A FAMILY PAPER.the serv
- Page 163 and 164:
April 6, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.this g
- Page 165 and 166:
.^pril 5,1893.A FAMILT PAPER.I LOVE
- Page 167 and 168:
April 5, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11W
- Page 169 and 170:
CONTENTS:THEGOVERNMENTSHALLBEUPON
- Page 171 and 172:
Aprill2,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.express
- Page 173 and 174:
April 12,1893 A FAMILY PAPEE. 5.PRI
- Page 175 and 176:
April 12, 1893.A FAMILT PAPEE.The '
- Page 177 and 178:
April 12, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.i lov
- Page 179 and 180:
April 12, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11,
- Page 181 and 182:
'^Ik AL Jii iii iillll l O f l ^^^^
- Page 183 and 184:
April 19.1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.«•
- Page 185 and 186:
April 19, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.II. T
- Page 187 and 188:
April 19, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.has b
- Page 189 and 190:
April 19, 1893.A FAMILT PAPEE.I LOV
- Page 191 and 192:
April 19,1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 10 a
- Page 193 and 194:
April 19, 1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 11.
- Page 195 and 196:
"'•1^' '^ •" itf -'i^' "tY Y^ i
- Page 197 and 198:
April 26.1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 3.«
- Page 199 and 200:
April 26,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.4. " H
- Page 201 and 202:
April 26, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.city
- Page 203 and 204:
April 26, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.. ,,.
- Page 205 and 206:
AprU ae, iays. A FAMILT PAPEE. 11.I
- Page 207 and 208:
DEPAETMENT OF MISSIONS - - - •The
- Page 209 and 210:
May 8,1893. A FAMILY PAPER. 3.**t--
- Page 211 and 212:
May S, 1898.A FAMILY PAPER.D E V O
- Page 213 and 214:
May 3, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEK.in Eome.
- Page 215 and 216:
May 3, 1893.A FAMILY PAPER.I LOVE I
- Page 217 and 218:
May 3,1893. A FAMILT PAPER. 11.Thin
- Page 219 and 220:
THEGOVERNMENTSHALLBEUPONHISSHOULDER
- Page 221 and 222:
May 10,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.•-f-f
- Page 223 and 224:
May 10, ia»3.A FAMILY PAPEE.you ev
- Page 225 and 226:
May 10, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.TheVyee
- Page 227 and 228:
May 10, 1893.A FAMILY PAPER.'fln»
- Page 229 and 230:
May 10,1893. A FAMILY PAPER. 11."Al
- Page 231 and 232:
IGHTEOOSNESSEXALTE^Bft^K-NATION^OLO
- Page 233 and 234:
May 17,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.*•»
- Page 235 and 236:
May 17, 1893.A EAMILY PAPEE.3. Eart
- Page 237 and 238:
May 17, 1893.A FAMILT PAPEE.TheV/ee
- Page 239 and 240:
May 17, 1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 9I LO
- Page 241 and 242:
May 17, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEK. 11.In
- Page 243 and 244:
llMlliiVi^lUilAWiWililUUiUi^MMAUiUA
- Page 245 and 246:
May 24,1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 8.*•
- Page 247 and 248:
May 24, 1893. A FAMILT PAPER. 6.to
- Page 249 and 250:
May 24, 1893.A FAMILT PAPER.have be
- Page 251 and 252:
May 24, 1893.A FAMILT PAPER.I LOVE
- Page 253 and 254:
May 24,1893. A FAMILT PAPER. 11.Fii
- Page 255 and 256:
EXALTETHA \j NATION. SOLOMON.Vol. X
- Page 257 and 258:
May 31,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.*4*- + +
- Page 259 and 260:
May 31, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 6.X.
- Page 261 and 262:
May 31, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.lives a
- Page 263 and 264:
May 31, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.firitt.
- Page 265 and 266:
May 31, 1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 11Dri
- Page 267 and 268:
^^IGHTEOBSNESS EXALTI NATION^THEGOV
- Page 269 and 270:
June 7.1898. A FAMILT PAPEB. 8.«
- Page 271 and 272:
June 7, 1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 5.noi
- Page 273 and 274:
June 7, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEB.tion to
- Page 275 and 276:
June 7, 1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.firn^^^
- Page 277 and 278:
Jarie 7, A FAMILT PAPEE. 11.ONEDOLL
- Page 279 and 280:
THEGOVERNCONTENTS•+• •—R. P
- Page 281 and 282:
June 14, 1893. A FAMILT PAPEE. 3.»
- Page 283 and 284:
June 1893. A FAMILY PAPER.Primary L
- Page 285 and 286:
June 14, 1893.A FAMILY PAPER.a sens
- Page 287 and 288:
June 14, 1893. A FAMILY PAPER. 9I L
- Page 289 and 290:
Jane U, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11ONE
- Page 291 and 292:
^^Irf||GHTEOBSNESS EXALTE3at=y\-NAT
- Page 293 and 294:
June 21,1893.A FAMILY PAPEK.to requ
- Page 295 and 296:
June 21,1893.A FAMILY PAPEE.4, E^vi
- Page 297 and 298:
June 21, 1893.A FAMILT PAPEB.fied,
- Page 299 and 300:
June 21, 1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 9I L
- Page 301 and 302:
June 21,1893. A FAMILY PAPEE. 11I K
- Page 303 and 304:
DEPARTMENT OF MISSIONS . . . .Lette
- Page 305 and 306:
tfUUO iiO. LOVO' A FAMILT PAPEE. 3
- Page 307 and 308:
June 28,1893.A FAMILT PAPEE,(&). Hi
- Page 309 and 310:
June 28, 1893.A FAMILT PAPEB.be exc
- Page 311 and 312:
June 28,1893.A FAMILT PAPEE.Wise Sa
- Page 313 and 314:
Jane 28, 1893. A FAMILT PAPER. 11.i
- Page 315:
ICHTEOBSNESS E X A L T NATION r:^SO