12.07.2015 Views

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How Do I Know <strong>The</strong>e? Let Me Count the Ways:Meditation and Basic Cognitive ProcessesEleanor RoschDepartment <strong>of</strong> PsychologyUniversity <strong>of</strong> California, BerkeleyONE OF THE BEST KEPT SECRETS <strong>of</strong> the last several centuries may bethat the study <strong>of</strong> religious experience conceived broadly can have somethingfundamental to contribute to scientific psychology. One hundredyears ago William James suggested this radical idea in his classic <strong>The</strong>Varieties <strong>of</strong> Religious Experience, yet today mainstream psychology is nocloser to considering the idea than it was in 1902. Surely one root <strong>of</strong> thisblindness is the way in which the categories and imagery <strong>of</strong> our societyenvisage an otherworldly religion and a naturalistic psychology which areon different planes <strong>of</strong> existence altogether and cannot communicate withone another. <strong>The</strong> distrust <strong>of</strong> first person experience, which B. Allan Wallacediscusses (this volume), is one important aspect <strong>of</strong> this divide. I believethat the Eastern meditation traditions, particularly <strong>Buddhist</strong> thoughtand meditation, can help to bridge the divide and thereby show a newdirection in which the study <strong>of</strong> the kinds <strong>of</strong> experience that our societyhas classified as religious can impact research in psychology and theemerging cognitive sciences.This is not purely an academic issue. Religion is deeply important topeople. It deals with, in the words <strong>of</strong> William James, “whatever is seen asmost primal and enveloping and deeply true.” 1 Our world is being tornapart by the chaos that can result when people feel their religion deeplyviolated. Yet modern psychology, like modern politicians, seems able onlyto talk at religions rather than to listen to them.Once we have divided the world into natural and supernatural, notingthat these are our own conceptual categories, and defined religion as beingabout the latter, then the direction <strong>of</strong> causal explanation in naturalisticscience can flow in only one direction—from psychology and cognitivescience to religious beliefs and feelings. This has typically meant a reductionist-materialist“explaining away” <strong>of</strong> various aspects <strong>of</strong> religion. Religiousfaith may be explained in terms <strong>of</strong> psychoanalytic childhood experiences—ashas been done since Freud; supernatural beings explained by the“theory <strong>of</strong> mind” that children develop by age four, 2 or “oceanic” medita-33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!