12.07.2015 Views

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Payne: Cognitive <strong>The</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> Ritual and <strong>Buddhist</strong> Practice 87NOTES1. Ilkka Pyysiäinen, How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science<strong>of</strong> Religion (Leiden: Brill, 2001), pp. 1–2.2. Pyysiäinan, How Religion Works, pp. 13–14.3. Note that these are cognitive categories, i.e., psychological in character,and not proposed as metaphysical categories. I would myselfunderstand these as an interaction between the experienced world andthe developing cognitive abilities which are shared by humans. <strong>The</strong>reis, perhaps not surprisingly, continuing debate over these ideas, much<strong>of</strong> which centers on the question <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> socially basedlinguistic categories. See Melissa Bowerman and Stephen C. Levinson,eds., Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001).4. Pascal Boyer, “Cognitive Constraints on Cultural Representations:Natural Ontologies and Religious Ideas,” p. 401 in Lawrence A.Hirschfeld and Susan A. Gelman, eds., Mapping the Mind: DomainSpecificity in Cognition and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1994, pp. 391–411).5. Boyer, “Cognitive Constraints on Cultural Representations,” p. 393. Seealso Pascal Boyer and Sheila Walker, “Intuitive Ontology and CulturalInput in the Acquisition <strong>of</strong> Religious Concepts,” in Karl S. Rosengren, CarlN. Johnson, and Paul L. Harris, eds., Imagining the Impossible: Magical,Scientific, and Religious Thinking in Children (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2000, pp. 130–156), and Pascal Boyer, “Causal Understandingsin Cultural Representations: Cognitive Constraints on Inferencesfrom Cultural Input,” in Causal Cognition: A MultidisciplinaryDebate, Dan Sperber, David Premack, and Ann James Premack, eds.(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 615–644).6. Boyer, “Cognitive Constraints,” p. 395.7. Frank C. Keil, Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development (Cambridge:<strong>The</strong> MIT Press, 1989). Keil himself discusses three different sorts <strong>of</strong>concepts: natural kinds, nominal kinds, and artifacts (see “Chapter 3:Natural Kinds, Nominal Kinds, and Artifacts”). See also Frank C. Keil,“<strong>The</strong> Birth and Nurturance <strong>of</strong> Concepts by Domains: <strong>The</strong> Origins <strong>of</strong>Concepts <strong>of</strong> Living Beings” in Hirschfeld and Gelman, eds., Mapping theMind (Pp. 234–254).8. Boyer, “Cognitive Constraints,” pp. 400–401.9. Pyysiäinen, How Religion Works, p. 23.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!